Pseudo-labelling meets Label Smoothing for Noisy Partial Label Learning

2402.04835

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/29/2024 by Darshana Saravanan, Naresh Manwani, Vineet Gandhi

🌿

Abstract

Partial label learning (PLL) is a weakly-supervised learning paradigm where each training instance is paired with a set of candidate labels (partial label), one of which is the true label. Noisy PLL (NPLL) relaxes this constraint by allowing some partial labels to not contain the true label, enhancing the practicality of the problem. Our work centres on NPLL and presents a minimalistic framework that initially assigns pseudo-labels to images by exploiting the noisy partial labels through a weighted nearest neighbour algorithm. These pseudo-label and image pairs are then used to train a deep neural network classifier with label smoothing. The classifier's features and predictions are subsequently employed to refine and enhance the accuracy of pseudo-labels. We perform thorough experiments on seven datasets and compare against nine NPLL and PLL methods. We achieve state-of-the-art results in all studied settings from the prior literature, obtaining substantial gains in fine-grained classification and extreme noise scenarios. Further, we show the promising generalisation capability of our framework in realistic crowd-sourced datasets.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces a new approach to Noisy Partial Label Learning (NPLL), a machine learning setting where training data includes noisy, incomplete labels.
  • The proposed framework initially assigns pseudo-labels to images using a weighted nearest neighbor algorithm, then trains a deep neural network classifier with label smoothing to refine and enhance the accuracy of these pseudo-labels.
  • The authors demonstrate state-of-the-art performance on seven datasets, including challenging fine-grained classification and extreme noise scenarios, as well as promising generalization to realistic crowd-sourced datasets.

Plain English Explanation

In machine learning, it's common to have training data where each example is paired with a label that identifies what the example represents. However, sometimes the labels can be noisy or incomplete - for example, an image might be labeled as containing "dog or cat," when in reality it only contains a dog.

This paper tackles this Noisy Partial Label Learning (NPLL) problem with a new approach. It starts by using a smart algorithm to take the noisy, incomplete labels and assign a best guess ("pseudo-label") to each training example. Then, it uses those pseudo-label and image pairs to train a powerful deep neural network classifier.

As the training progresses, the classifier's predictions help refine and improve the accuracy of the pseudo-labels. This iterative process allows the system to overcome the limitations of the original noisy, partial labels and achieve impressive performance, even on very challenging classification tasks.

The authors show their framework outperforms other NPLL methods across a range of real-world datasets, including fine-grained classification (e.g., distinguishing between similar species of birds) and scenarios with extreme label noise. This suggests their approach has broad applicability and the potential to unlock the value of imperfect label data.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a minimalistic framework for Noisy Partial Label Learning (NPLL). NPLL is a weakly-supervised learning setting where each training instance is paired with a set of candidate labels (partial label), some of which may not contain the true label.

The authors' approach has two key steps:

  1. Pseudo-Label Assignment: Initially, the framework assigns pseudo-labels to training images by exploiting the noisy partial labels through a weighted nearest neighbor algorithm.

  2. Classifier Training: The pseudo-label and image pairs are then used to train a deep neural network classifier with label smoothing. The classifier's features and predictions are subsequently employed to refine and enhance the accuracy of the pseudo-labels.

The authors perform extensive experiments on seven datasets and compare their framework against nine existing NPLL and PLL methods. They achieve state-of-the-art results in all studied settings, obtaining substantial gains in fine-grained classification and extreme noise scenarios. Furthermore, they demonstrate the framework's promising generalization capability on realistic crowd-sourced datasets.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a strong technical contribution to the field of Noisy Partial Label Learning, with a well-designed framework that achieves impressive empirical results. The authors thoroughly evaluate their approach and provide compelling comparisons to prior work.

However, the paper does not extensively discuss potential limitations or caveats of the proposed framework. For example, it would be valuable to understand how the pseudo-label refinement process scales with the size and complexity of the dataset, or how sensitive the performance is to the choice of hyperparameters.

Additionally, while the authors demonstrate generalization to crowd-sourced datasets, it would be insightful to explore failure modes or edge cases where the framework may struggle, such as highly ambiguous or contradictory partial labels. Investigating these aspects could help provide a more holistic understanding of the method's strengths and weaknesses.

Overall, this work represents a significant advancement in NPLL and sets a new bar for state-of-the-art performance. Further research exploring the boundaries and limitations of the proposed approach would be a valuable complement to this impactful contribution.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel framework for Noisy Partial Label Learning that achieves impressive results across a range of real-world datasets. By intelligently assigning pseudo-labels and then iteratively refining them through deep neural network training, the authors demonstrate the potential of this weakly-supervised learning paradigm to unlock the value of imperfect label data.

The framework's strong performance, particularly in challenging fine-grained classification and extreme noise scenarios, suggests it could have wide-ranging applications in fields where obtaining high-quality labeled data is difficult or costly. As machine learning continues to be applied to increasingly complex problems, techniques like this that can effectively leverage noisy or incomplete supervision will become increasingly valuable.

While the paper does not extensively explore potential limitations, the authors have made a significant contribution to advancing the state-of-the-art in this important area of machine learning research.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Graph Partial Label Learning with Potential Cause Discovering

Graph Partial Label Learning with Potential Cause Discovering

Hang Gao, Jiaguo Yuan, Jiangmeng Li, Peng Qiao, Fengge Wu, Changwen Zheng, Huaping Liu

YC

0

Reddit

0

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have garnered widespread attention for their potential to address the challenges posed by graph representation learning, which face complex graph-structured data across various domains. However, due to the inherent complexity and interconnectedness of graphs, accurately annotating graph data for training GNNs is extremely challenging. To address this issue, we have introduced Partial Label Learning (PLL) into graph representation learning. PLL is a critical weakly supervised learning problem where each training instance is associated with a set of candidate labels, including the ground-truth label and the additional interfering labels. PLL allows annotators to make errors, which reduces the difficulty of data labeling. Subsequently, we propose a novel graph representation learning method that enables GNN models to effectively learn discriminative information within the context of PLL. Our approach utilizes potential cause extraction to obtain graph data that holds causal relationships with the labels. By conducting auxiliary training based on the extracted graph data, our model can effectively eliminate the interfering information in the PLL scenario. We support the rationale behind our method with a series of theoretical analyses. Moreover, we conduct extensive evaluations and ablation studies on multiple datasets, demonstrating the superiority of our proposed method.

Read more

5/24/2024

Trustworthy Partial Label Learning with Out-of-distribution Detection

Trustworthy Partial Label Learning with Out-of-distribution Detection

Jintao Huang, Yiu-Ming Cheung, Chi-Man Vong

YC

0

Reddit

0

Partial Label Learning (PLL) tackles model learning from the data with inexact labels under the assumption that training and test objects are in the same distribution, i.e., closed-set scenario. Nevertheless, this assumption does not hold in real-world open-set scenarios where test data may come from Out-Of-Distribution (OOD), resulting in object detection failure and hence significantly compromising the PLL model's security and trustworthiness. This is a previously unexplored problem called Out-Of-Distribution Partial Label Learning (OODPLL) that our newly proposed PLOOD framework can effectively resolve. During the training phase, our framework leverages self-supervised learning strategy to generate positive and negative samples for each object, emulating in and out-of-distributions respectively. Under these distributions, PLL methods can learn discriminative features for OOD objects. In the inference phase, a novel Partial Energy (PE) scoring technique is proposed which leverages the label confidence established during the above training phase to mine the actual labels. In this way, the issue of inexact labeling in PLL can be effectively addressed for significantly better performance in OOD object detection. PLOOD is compared with SOTA PLL models and OOD scores on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 datasets against various OOD datasets. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of our PLOOD framework, significantly outperforming SOTA PLL models and marking a substantial advancement in addressing PLL problems in real-world OOD scenarios.

Read more

6/4/2024

🤔

Smooth Pseudo-Labeling

Nikolaos Karaliolios, Herv'e Le Borgne, Florian Chabot

YC

0

Reddit

0

Semi-Supervised Learning (SSL) seeks to leverage large amounts of non-annotated data along with the smallest amount possible of annotated data in order to achieve the same level of performance as if all data were annotated. A fruitful method in SSL is Pseudo-Labeling (PL), which, however, suffers from the important drawback that the associated loss function has discontinuities in its derivatives, which cause instabilities in performance when labels are very scarce. In the present work, we address this drawback with the introduction of a Smooth Pseudo-Labeling (SP L) loss function. It consists in adding a multiplicative factor in the loss function that smooths out the discontinuities in the derivative due to thresholding. In our experiments, we test our improvements on FixMatch and show that it significantly improves the performance in the regime of scarce labels, without addition of any modules, hyperparameters, or computational overhead. In the more stable regime of abundant labels, performance remains at the same level. Robustness with respect to variation of hyperparameters and training parameters is also significantly improved. Moreover, we introduce a new benchmark, where labeled images are selected randomly from the whole dataset, without imposing representation of each class proportional to its frequency in the dataset. We see that the smooth version of FixMatch does appear to perform better than the original, non-smooth implementation. However, more importantly, we notice that both implementations do not necessarily see their performance improve when labeled images are added, an important issue in the design of SSL algorithms that should be addressed so that Active Learning algorithms become more reliable and explainable.

Read more

5/24/2024

Estimating Noisy Class Posterior with Part-level Labels for Noisy Label Learning

Estimating Noisy Class Posterior with Part-level Labels for Noisy Label Learning

Rui Zhao, Bin Shi, Jianfei Ruan, Tianze Pan, Bo Dong

YC

0

Reddit

0

In noisy label learning, estimating noisy class posteriors plays a fundamental role for developing consistent classifiers, as it forms the basis for estimating clean class posteriors and the transition matrix. Existing methods typically learn noisy class posteriors by training a classification model with noisy labels. However, when labels are incorrect, these models may be misled to overemphasize the feature parts that do not reflect the instance characteristics, resulting in significant errors in estimating noisy class posteriors. To address this issue, this paper proposes to augment the supervised information with part-level labels, encouraging the model to focus on and integrate richer information from various parts. Specifically, our method first partitions features into distinct parts by cropping instances, yielding part-level labels associated with these various parts. Subsequently, we introduce a novel single-to-multiple transition matrix to model the relationship between the noisy and part-level labels, which incorporates part-level labels into a classifier-consistent framework. Utilizing this framework with part-level labels, we can learn the noisy class posteriors more precisely by guiding the model to integrate information from various parts, ultimately improving the classification performance. Our method is theoretically sound, while experiments show that it is empirically effective in synthetic and real-world noisy benchmarks.

Read more

5/10/2024