Quelle {'e}thique pour quelle IA ?

Overview

• This study analyzes the different types of ethical approaches involved in the ethics of AI and examines their interests and limitations.
• The author introduces the contemporary need for and meaning of ethics, distinguishing it from other forms of normativity and highlighting its inadequacy for formalization.
• The paper presents a mapping of the landscape of ethical theories covered by moral philosophy, differentiating between meta-ethics, normative ethics, and applied ethics.
• The analysis focuses on the main ethical currents that have gained prominence in the practice of digital ethics and AI in Western democracies.
• The study concludes with a reflection on the reasons why a human-centric ethics of AI based on a pragmatic practice of contextual ethics remains necessary and irreducible to any formalization or automated treatment of the ethical questions that arise.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at the different ways that ethics can be approached when it comes to artificial intelligence (AI). The author starts by explaining what ethics is and how it is different from other types of rules or guidelines. They then provide an overview of the different branches of ethics, including meta-ethics, normative ethics, and applied ethics.

The main focus of the paper is on the key ethical perspectives that have become influential in how we think about the ethics of digital technologies and AI in Western countries. The author questions whether these current ethical practices are sufficient and satisfactory for addressing the ethical challenges posed by AI.

Ultimately, the study concludes that a human-centered approach to the ethics of AI, based on a practical and contextual understanding of ethics, is still necessary and cannot be fully replaced by any formal or automated systems for handling ethical questions related to AI.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a cartography of the ethical landscape as it pertains to artificial intelligence. The author first distinguishes ethics from other forms of normativity and highlights the inadequacy of trying to fully formalize it.

The paper then provides an overview of the different branches of moral philosophy, including meta-ethics, normative ethics, and applied ethics. The author analyzes how these ethical perspectives have been applied in the context of digital ethics and AI.

The core argument is that while these ethical frameworks have become influential in guiding the development of AI, they may not be sufficient or satisfactory for fully addressing the ethical challenges posed by AI. The paper concludes that a human-centered, contextual approach to the ethics of AI remains necessary and irreducible to formalization or automation.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the different ethical approaches relevant to AI, but does not delve deeply into the specific strengths, weaknesses, and practical applications of each framework. The author could have explored more concrete examples or case studies to illustrate the limitations of current ethical practices in the AI domain.

Additionally, the paper does not address the potential role of interdisciplinary collaboration, public engagement, or other approaches that could complement the human-centered, contextual ethics advocated by the author. Exploring these alternative or complementary perspectives could have strengthened the analysis.

Overall, the study raises important questions about the adequacy of existing ethical frameworks for guiding the development and deployment of AI systems. The author's call for a pragmatic, human-centric approach to AI ethics is well-justified, but further research may be needed to fully articulate how such an approach can be effectively implemented in practice.

Conclusion

This study highlights the need for a nuanced and contextual approach to the ethics of artificial intelligence. While current ethical frameworks have influenced the way we think about the ethical implications of AI, the author argues that a purely formalized or automated approach to AI ethics may be insufficient.

The paper suggests that a human-centered ethics of AI, grounded in practical, real-world considerations, is necessary to address the complex ethical challenges posed by these technologies. This emphasizes the importance of maintaining a strong human role in shaping the ethical development and deployment of AI systems, rather than relying solely on pre-defined rules or algorithms.

Overall, the study underscores the importance of continued research, debate, and multidisciplinary collaboration in navigating the ethical landscapes of artificial intelligence.