RAGged Edges: The Double-Edged Sword of Retrieval-Augmented Chatbots

Read original: arXiv:2403.01193 - Published 6/13/2024 by Philip Feldman, James R. Foulds, Shimei Pan

🐍

Overview

This paper explores the double-edged sword of retrieval-augmented chatbots, which use external information to enhance their responses.
It examines the potential benefits and drawbacks of these systems, focusing on the risk of introducing "raggedness" or inconsistencies in the chatbot's outputs.
The paper proposes new terms to describe the emergent properties of large language models (LLMs) that go beyond a simple probability-based vocabulary.

Plain English Explanation

Chatbots are AI-powered assistants that can engage in conversations with humans. Some chatbots, known as retrieval-augmented chatbots, use external information sources to enhance their responses. This can be helpful, but it also comes with risks.

The paper argues that while retrieval-augmented chatbots can provide more relevant and informative responses, they can also introduce "raggedness" or inconsistencies in their outputs. This is because the external information they retrieve may not always align perfectly with the context of the conversation.

To better understand these systems, the paper proposes using new terms that go beyond a simple probability-based vocabulary. It suggests describing the chatbot's behavior in terms of "trajectories" or "navigation" rather than "decisions" or "thoughts." This reflects the idea that the chatbot's responses emerge from a complex interplay between the language model and the external information, rather than a straightforward reasoning process.

Technical Explanation

The paper explores the potential benefits and drawbacks of retrieval-augmented chatbots, which use external information sources to enhance their responses. The authors argue that while these systems can provide more relevant and informative outputs, they also risk introducing "raggedness" or inconsistencies in the chatbot's responses.

The paper proposes using new terms to describe the emergent properties of large language models (LLMs) that go beyond a simple probability-based vocabulary. Instead of using terms like "decides" or "thinks," the authors suggest using concepts like "trajectory" or "navigation" to capture the complex interplay between the language model and the external information.

The authors believe that prompts can be regarded as a self-influencing system that acts on the substrate of the LLM, akin to the path of Simon's Ant. This suggests that the chatbot's behavior is not the result of a straightforward reasoning process, but rather the product of a more nuanced and dynamic interaction between the language model and the retrieved information.

Critical Analysis

The paper raises important concerns about the potential risks of retrieval-augmented chatbots, particularly the risk of introducing inconsistencies or "raggedness" in the chatbot's outputs. This is a valid concern, as the retrieval of external information may not always align perfectly with the context of the conversation, leading to jarring or contradictory responses.

However, the paper could have delved deeper into specific examples or case studies to illustrate these risks more clearly. Additionally, the authors' proposed alternative terminology, while intriguing, could benefit from further explanation and discussion of how these new concepts might better capture the complexities of large language models and retrieval-augmented systems.

It would also be helpful for the paper to address potential mitigation strategies or design approaches that could help minimize the risks of "raggedness" in retrieval-augmented chatbots. Exploring these areas could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the challenges and potential solutions in this emerging field.

Conclusion

This paper offers a thought-provoking examination of the double-edged nature of retrieval-augmented chatbots. While these systems can enhance the relevance and informativeness of chatbot responses, they also introduce the risk of introducing inconsistencies or "raggedness" in the output.

The paper's proposal for new terminology to describe the emergent properties of large language models is an intriguing contribution, as it suggests the need to move beyond a purely probabilistic understanding of these systems. By framing the chatbot's behavior in terms of "trajectories" and "navigation," the authors invite us to consider the complexity of the interplay between the language model and the external information.

Overall, this paper raises important questions about the design and deployment of retrieval-augmented chatbots, and underscores the need for continued research and development to address the challenges and unlock the full potential of these systems.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🐍

RAGged Edges: The Double-Edged Sword of Retrieval-Augmented Chatbots

Philip Feldman, James R. Foulds, Shimei Pan

Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT demonstrate the remarkable progress of artificial intelligence. However, their tendency to hallucinate -- generate plausible but false information -- poses a significant challenge. This issue is critical, as seen in recent court cases where ChatGPT's use led to citations of non-existent legal rulings. This paper explores how Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) can counter hallucinations by integrating external knowledge with prompts. We empirically evaluate RAG against standard LLMs using prompts designed to induce hallucinations. Our results show that RAG increases accuracy in some cases, but can still be misled when prompts directly contradict the model's pre-trained understanding. These findings highlight the complex nature of hallucinations and the need for more robust solutions to ensure LLM reliability in real-world applications. We offer practical recommendations for RAG deployment and discuss implications for the development of more trustworthy LLMs.

6/13/2024

Reducing hallucination in structured outputs via Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Patrice B'echard, Orlando Marquez Ayala

A common and fundamental limitation of Generative AI (GenAI) is its propensity to hallucinate. While large language models (LLM) have taken the world by storm, without eliminating or at least reducing hallucinations, real-world GenAI systems may face challenges in user adoption. In the process of deploying an enterprise application that produces workflows based on natural language requirements, we devised a system leveraging Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) to greatly improve the quality of the structured output that represents such workflows. Thanks to our implementation of RAG, our proposed system significantly reduces hallucinations in the output and improves the generalization of our LLM in out-of-domain settings. In addition, we show that using a small, well-trained retriever encoder can reduce the size of the accompanying LLM, thereby making deployments of LLM-based systems less resource-intensive.

4/15/2024

RAGTruth: A Hallucination Corpus for Developing Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Language Models

Cheng Niu, Yuanhao Wu, Juno Zhu, Siliang Xu, Kashun Shum, Randy Zhong, Juntong Song, Tong Zhang

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has become a main technique for alleviating hallucinations in large language models (LLMs). Despite the integration of RAG, LLMs may still present unsupported or contradictory claims to the retrieved contents. In order to develop effective hallucination prevention strategies under RAG, it is important to create benchmark datasets that can measure the extent of hallucination. This paper presents RAGTruth, a corpus tailored for analyzing word-level hallucinations in various domains and tasks within the standard RAG frameworks for LLM applications. RAGTruth comprises nearly 18,000 naturally generated responses from diverse LLMs using RAG. These responses have undergone meticulous manual annotations at both the individual cases and word levels, incorporating evaluations of hallucination intensity. We not only benchmark hallucination frequencies across different LLMs, but also critically assess the effectiveness of several existing hallucination detection methodologies. Furthermore, we show that using a high-quality dataset such as RAGTruth, it is possible to finetune a relatively small LLM and achieve a competitive level of performance in hallucination detection when compared to the existing prompt-based approaches using state-of-the-art large language models such as GPT-4.

5/20/2024

🛸

PersonaRAG: Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems with User-Centric Agents

Saber Zerhoudi, Michael Granitzer

Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle with generating reliable outputs due to outdated knowledge and hallucinations. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) models address this by enhancing LLMs with external knowledge, but often fail to personalize the retrieval process. This paper introduces PersonaRAG, a novel framework incorporating user-centric agents to adapt retrieval and generation based on real-time user data and interactions. Evaluated across various question answering datasets, PersonaRAG demonstrates superiority over baseline models, providing tailored answers to user needs. The results suggest promising directions for user-adapted information retrieval systems.

7/15/2024