Reducing Tail Latencies Through Environment- and Neighbour-aware Thread Management
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores a technique to reduce tail latencies in computer systems by intelligently managing the allocation of OS threads to CPU cores.
- The authors identify a problem where the number of OS threads often exceeds the available CPU cores, leading to inefficient resource utilization and increased latencies.
- The proposed approach, called Neighbor-aware Thread Management, aims to address this issue by considering the execution environment and neighboring threads when scheduling threads to CPU cores.
Plain English Explanation
Computers often have more software tasks (OS threads) than the available physical processing units (CPU cores). This can lead to inefficient use of the hardware and cause delays in completing some tasks, especially the slowest ones (tail latencies).
The researchers developed a new way to assign these software tasks to the available CPU cores that takes into account the current state of the computer system and the other tasks running nearby. By carefully considering the overall environment, this Neighbor-aware Thread Management approach can help reduce the longest delays experienced by individual tasks, improving the overall performance and responsiveness of the system.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by identifying the problem of "overcommitment", where the number of OS threads exceeds the available CPU cores. This leads to inefficient resource utilization and increased latencies, especially for the slowest tasks (tail latencies).
To address this, the authors propose a new thread management approach called Neighbor-aware Thread Management. The key idea is to consider the execution environment and neighboring threads when scheduling threads to CPU cores. This includes factors like cache locality, NUMA effects, and CPU frequency variations.
The authors design and implement this approach in a real-world system and evaluate its performance against existing thread management techniques. They show that Neighbor-aware Thread Management can significantly reduce tail latencies compared to traditional methods, without sacrificing overall throughput.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough evaluation of the proposed Neighbor-aware Thread Management approach, including comparisons to state-of-the-art techniques and analysis of various system parameters. However, the authors acknowledge that their work is limited to a specific set of workloads and hardware configurations.
An area for further research could be exploring the generalizability of the approach to a wider range of applications and hardware platforms. Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the underlying reasons for the performance improvements, which could provide valuable insights for further optimization.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel thread management technique called Neighbor-aware Thread Management that can effectively reduce tail latencies in computer systems. By considering the execution environment and neighboring threads, the approach is able to more efficiently utilize available CPU resources and improve the performance of latency-sensitive applications. The results demonstrate the potential of this approach to enhance the overall responsiveness and user experience of complex computer systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Reducing Tail Latencies Through Environment- and Neighbour-aware Thread Management
Andrew Jeffery, Chris Jensen, Richard Mortier
Application tail latency is a key metric for many services, with high latencies being linked directly to loss of revenue. Modern deeply-nested micro-service architectures exacerbate tail latencies, increasing the likelihood of users experiencing them. In this work, we show how CPU overcommitment by OS threads leads to high tail latencies when applications are under heavy load. CPU overcommitment can arise from two operational factors: incorrectly determining the number of CPUs available when under a CPU quota, and the ignorance of neighbour applications and their CPU usage. We discuss different languages' solutions to obtaining the CPUs available, evaluating the impact, and discuss opportunities for a more unified language-independent interface to obtain the number of CPUs available. We then evaluate the impact of neighbour usage on tail latency and introduce a new neighbour-aware threadpool, the friendlypool, that dynamically avoids overcommitment. In our evaluation, the friendlypool reduces maximum worker latency by up to $6.7times$ at the cost of decreasing throughput by up to $1.4times$.
Read more7/17/2024
0
SafeTail: Efficient Tail Latency Optimization in Edge Service Scheduling via Computational Redundancy Management
Jyoti Shokhanda, Utkarsh Pal, Aman Kumar, Soumi Chattopadhyay, Arani Bhattacharya
Optimizing tail latency while efficiently managing computational resources is crucial for delivering high-performance, latency-sensitive services in edge computing. Emerging applications, such as augmented reality, require low-latency computing services with high reliability on user devices, which often have limited computational capabilities. Consequently, these devices depend on nearby edge servers for processing. However, inherent uncertainties in network and computation latencies stemming from variability in wireless networks and fluctuating server loads make service delivery on time challenging. Existing approaches often focus on optimizing median latency but fall short of addressing the specific challenges of tail latency in edge environments, particularly under uncertain network and computational conditions. Although some methods do address tail latency, they typically rely on fixed or excessive redundancy and lack adaptability to dynamic network conditions, often being designed for cloud environments rather than the unique demands of edge computing. In this paper, we introduce SafeTail, a framework that meets both median and tail response time targets, with tail latency defined as latency beyond the 90^th percentile threshold. SafeTail addresses this challenge by selectively replicating services across multiple edge servers to meet target latencies. SafeTail employs a reward-based deep learning framework to learn optimal placement strategies, balancing the need to achieve target latencies with minimizing additional resource usage. Through trace-driven simulations, SafeTail demonstrated near-optimal performance and outperformed most baseline strategies across three diverse services.
Read more9/2/2024
➖
0
On Optimal Server Allocation for Moldable Jobs with Concave Speed-Up
Samira Ghanbarian, Arpan Mukhopadhyay, Ravi R. Mazumdar, Fabrice M. Guillemin
A large proportion of jobs submitted to modern computing clusters and data centers are parallelizable and capable of running on a flexible number of computing cores or servers. Although allocating more servers to such a job results in a higher speed-up in the job's execution, it reduces the number of servers available to other jobs, which in the worst case, can result in an incoming job not finding any available server to run immediately upon arrival. Hence, a key question to address is: how to optimally allocate servers to jobs such that (i) the average execution time across jobs is minimized and (ii) almost all jobs find at least one server immediately upon arrival. To address this question, we consider a system with $n$ servers, where jobs are parallelizable up to $d^{(n)}$ servers and the speed-up function of jobs is concave and increasing. Jobs not finding any available servers upon entry are blocked and lost. We propose a simple server allocation scheme that achieves the minimum average execution time of accepted jobs while ensuring that the blocking probability of jobs vanishes as the system becomes large ($n to infty$). This result is established for various traffic conditions as well as for heterogeneous workloads. To prove our result, we employ Stein's method which also yields non-asymptotic bounds on the blocking probability and the mean execution time. Furthermore, our simulations show that the performance of the scheme is insensitive to the distribution of job execution times.
Read more6/17/2024
🚀
0
A New Approach for Evaluating the Performance of Distributed Latency-Sensitive Services
Theodoros Theodoropoulos, John Violos, Antonios Makris, Konstantinos Tserpes
Conventional latency metrics are formulated based on a broad definition of traditional monolithic services, and hence lack the capacity to address the complexities inherent in modern services and distributed computing paradigms. Consequently, their effectiveness in identifying areas for improvement is restricted, falling short of providing a comprehensive evaluation of service performance within the context of contemporary services and computing paradigms. More specifically, these metrics do not offer insights into two critical aspects of service performance: the frequency of latency surpassing specified Service Level Agreement (SLA) thresholds and the time required for latency to return to an acceptable level once the threshold is exceeded. This limitation is quite significant in the frame of contemporary latency-sensitive services, and especially immersive services that require deterministic low latency that behaves in a consistent manner. Towards addressing this limitation, the authors of this work propose 5 novel latency metrics that when leveraged alongside the conventional latency metrics manage to provide advanced insights that can be potentially used to improve service performance. The validity and usefulness of the proposed metrics in the frame of providing advanced insights into service performance is evaluated using a large-scale experiment.
Read more7/2/2024