Region-level labels in ice charts can produce pixel-level segmentation for Sea Ice types

Read original: arXiv:2405.10456 - Published 5/20/2024 by Muhammed Patel, Xinwei Chen, Linlin Xu, Yuhao Chen, K Andrea Scott, David A. Clausi
Total Score

0

Region-level labels in ice charts can produce pixel-level segmentation for Sea Ice types

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores a novel approach to generating pixel-level segmentation of sea ice types using only region-level labels from ice charts.
  • The researchers developed a deep learning model that can learn from the coarse, region-level labels in ice charts to produce detailed, pixel-level segmentation maps.
  • This method has the potential to enable efficient and accurate sea ice monitoring using widely available ice chart data, without the need for costly and time-consuming manual labeling of satellite imagery.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a way to use existing ice charts - maps that show the overall coverage and type of sea ice in an area - to automatically create much more detailed maps that show the exact location and type of different ice features.

Typically, creating these detailed maps requires manually labeling a large number of satellite images, which is a slow and expensive process. Instead, the researchers trained a deep learning model to learn from the coarse, region-level labels in the ice charts. This allowed the model to then generate high-resolution, pixel-level segmentation maps of the sea ice, without needing the detailed manual labels.

This approach could make it much easier and cheaper to monitor sea ice conditions over large areas, which is important for applications like shipping, scientific research, and environmental protection. By leveraging existing data sources, the method provides an efficient way to create highly detailed sea ice maps.

Technical Explanation

The researchers developed a semi-supervised deep learning approach that can learn to segment satellite imagery into different sea ice types using only region-level labels from ice charts as supervision.

Their model consists of a segmentation network and a region classification network. The segmentation network takes satellite imagery as input and produces a detailed pixel-level segmentation map. The region classification network uses the segmentation output to predict the coarse, region-level ice labels.

During training, the model is optimized to minimize the error between the predicted region-level labels and the ground truth ice chart labels, while also encouraging the segmentation network to produce coherent pixel-level segmentations. This allows the model to learn to generate detailed segmentation maps from the coarse regional labels.

The researchers evaluated their approach on satellite imagery of the Arctic, showing that it can produce accurate pixel-level segmentation of sea ice types like open water, young ice, and various forms of older ice. Compared to methods that require manual pixel-level labeling, this approach is more efficient and scalable, making it a promising tool for operational sea ice monitoring.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a compelling demonstration of how weakly-supervised learning techniques can be applied to the problem of sea ice mapping. By leveraging the wealth of existing ice chart data, the researchers have developed a method that can generate detailed segmentation maps without the need for costly manual labeling.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations of this approach. For example, the quality and consistency of the ice chart labels may vary, which could introduce biases or errors into the model's predictions. Additionally, the segmentation performance may be affected by factors like cloud cover, seasonal changes, and regional differences in ice characteristics.

Further research is needed to understand the generalization capabilities of this model and to explore ways of incorporating additional data sources, such as weather data or historical ice observations, to improve robustness and accuracy. Rigorous testing in diverse operational scenarios would also be valuable to assess the practical utility of this approach for real-world sea ice monitoring applications.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel deep learning-based method for generating detailed, pixel-level segmentation of sea ice types using only coarse, region-level labels from ice charts. By leveraging this existing data source, the researchers have developed an efficient and scalable approach to sea ice mapping that could have significant implications for a wide range of applications, from shipping and logistics to environmental monitoring and climate research.

While the paper demonstrates the potential of this technique, further work is needed to fully understand its limitations and to explore ways of enhancing its performance and robustness. Nevertheless, this research represents an important step forward in the ongoing effort to develop innovative tools and methods for understanding and monitoring the complex and rapidly changing Arctic environment.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Region-level labels in ice charts can produce pixel-level segmentation for Sea Ice types
Total Score

0

Region-level labels in ice charts can produce pixel-level segmentation for Sea Ice types

Muhammed Patel, Xinwei Chen, Linlin Xu, Yuhao Chen, K Andrea Scott, David A. Clausi

Fully supervised deep learning approaches have demonstrated impressive accuracy in sea ice classification, but their dependence on high-resolution labels presents a significant challenge due to the difficulty of obtaining such data. In response, our weakly supervised learning method provides a compelling alternative by utilizing lower-resolution regional labels from expert-annotated ice charts. This approach achieves exceptional pixel-level classification performance by introducing regional loss representations during training to measure the disparity between predicted and ice chart-derived sea ice type distributions. Leveraging the AI4Arctic Sea Ice Challenge Dataset, our method outperforms the fully supervised U-Net benchmark, the top solution of the AutoIce challenge, in both mapping resolution and class-wise accuracy, marking a significant advancement in automated operational sea ice mapping.

Read more

5/20/2024

🏷️

Total Score

0

Partial Label Learning with Focal Loss for Sea Ice Classification Based on Ice Charts

Behzad Vahedi, Benjamin Lucas, Farnoush Banaei-Kashani, Andrew P. Barrett, Walter N. Meier, Siri Jodha Khalsa, Morteza Karimzadeh

Sea ice, crucial to the Arctic and Earth's climate, requires consistent monitoring and high-resolution mapping. Manual sea ice mapping, however, is time-consuming and subjective, prompting the need for automated deep learning-based classification approaches. However, training these algorithms is challenging because expert-generated ice charts, commonly used as training data, do not map single ice types but instead map polygons with multiple ice types. Moreover, the distribution of various ice types in these charts is frequently imbalanced, resulting in a performance bias towards the dominant class. In this paper, we present a novel GeoAI approach to training sea ice classification by formalizing it as a partial label learning task with explicit confidence scores to address multiple labels and class imbalance. We treat the polygon-level labels as candidate partial labels, assign the corresponding ice concentrations as confidence scores to each candidate label, and integrate them with focal loss to train a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Our proposed approach leads to enhanced performance for sea ice classification in Sentinel-1 dual-polarized SAR images, improving classification accuracy (from 87% to 92%) and weighted average F-1 score (from 90% to 93%) compared to the conventional training approach of using one-hot encoded labels and Categorical Cross-Entropy loss. It also improves the F-1 score in 4 out of the 6 sea ice classes.

Read more

6/11/2024

👁️

Total Score

0

Global-Local Detail Guided Transformer for Sea Ice Recognition in Optical Remote Sensing Images

Zhanchao Huang, Wenjun Hong, Hua Su

The recognition of sea ice is of great significance for reflecting climate change and ensuring the safety of ship navigation. Recently, many deep learning based methods have been proposed and applied to segment and recognize sea ice regions. However, the diverse scales of sea ice areas, the zigzag and fine edge contours, and the difficulty in distinguishing different types of sea ice pose challenges to existing sea ice recognition models. In this paper, a Global-Local Detail Guided Transformer (GDGT) method is proposed for sea ice recognition in optical remote sensing images. In GDGT, a global-local feature fusiont mechanism is designed to fuse global structural correlation features and local spatial detail features. Furthermore, a detail-guided decoder is developed to retain more high-resolution detail information during feature reconstruction for improving the performance of sea ice recognition. Experiments on the produced sea ice dataset demonstrated the effectiveness and advancement of GDGT.

Read more

5/24/2024

🎯

Total Score

0

Assessing Annotation Accuracy in Ice Sheets Using Quantitative Metrics

Bayu Adhi Tama, Vandana Janeja, Sanjay Purushotham

The increasing threat of sea level rise due to climate change necessitates a deeper understanding of ice sheet structures. This study addresses the need for accurate ice sheet data interpretation by introducing a suite of quantitative metrics designed to validate ice sheet annotation techniques. Focusing on both manual and automated methods, including ARESELP and its modified version, MARESELP, we assess their accuracy against expert annotations. Our methodology incorporates several computer vision metrics, traditionally underutilized in glaciological research, to evaluate the continuity and connectivity of ice layer annotations. The results demonstrate that while manual annotations provide invaluable expert insights, automated methods, particularly MARESELP, improve layer continuity and alignment with expert labels.

Read more

7/16/2024