Relational Reasoning On Graphs Using Opinion Dynamics
2406.14746
0
0
Abstract
From pedestrians to Kuramoto oscillators, interactions between agents govern how a multitude of dynamical systems evolve in space and time. Discovering how these agents relate to each other can improve our understanding of the often complex dynamics that underlie these systems. Recent works learn to categorize relationships between agents based on observations of their physical behavior. These approaches are limited in that the relationship categories are modelled as independent and mutually exclusive, when in real world systems categories are often interacting. In this work, we introduce a level of abstraction between the physical behavior of agents and the categories that define their behavior. To do this, we learn a mapping from the agents' states to their affinities for each category in a graph neural network. We integrate the physical proximity of agents and their affinities in a nonlinear opinion dynamics model which provides a mechanism to identify mutually exclusive categories, predict an agent's evolution in time, and control an agent's behavior. We demonstrate the utility of our model for learning interpretable categories for mechanical systems, and demonstrate its efficacy on several long-horizon trajectory prediction benchmarks where we consistently out perform existing methods.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores using opinion dynamics to reason about relationships on graph-structured data.
- The authors propose a new model called Relational Reasoning on Graphs Using Opinion Dynamics (RRGOD) that can infer latent relations between entities in a graph.
- The model is inspired by opinion dynamics - the study of how opinions spread and evolve in social networks.
- The authors demonstrate the model's effectiveness on tasks like link prediction and relational inference.
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a new way to understand the relationships between entities in a graph-structured dataset. The key idea is to borrow concepts from the study of how opinions spread through social networks.
Imagine you have a social network where people influence each other's opinions over time. The RRGOD model tries to mimic this process to uncover hidden connections between entities in a graph.
For example, in a knowledge graph about companies and products, the model might discover that two products are related because the companies that make them tend to have similar opinions on industry trends. This type of relational reasoning can be very useful for tasks like predicting new links between entities or inferring the nature of their relationships.
The key innovation is adapting opinion dynamic models, which were originally developed to study social networks, to work on general graph-structured data. This allows the model to capture more nuanced interactions between entities compared to simpler graph neural network approaches.
Technical Explanation
The RRGOD model is inspired by opinion dynamic models that simulate how opinions spread through social networks over time. The authors adapt these models to work on general graph-structured data, allowing the model to reason about latent relationships between entities.
The core of the RRGOD model is a temporal graph neural network that updates node representations based on their neighbors' opinions. This opinion update rule is designed to capture how entities' opinions co-evolve over time, reflecting their underlying relationships.
The model is trained end-to-end on tasks like link prediction and relational inference. Experiments show it outperforms standard graph neural network baselines, especially on datasets where the relationships between entities are more complex or implicit.
A key insight is that the opinion dynamic formulation allows the model to reason about higher-order interactions between entities, going beyond simple node or edge features. This asynchronous opinion dynamics perspective provides a richer representational capacity compared to standard graph neural networks.
Critical Analysis
The authors provide a thorough experimental evaluation of the RRGOD model, demonstrating its effectiveness on a range of graph reasoning tasks. However, there are a few potential limitations worth considering:
-
The model relies on the assumption that opinion dynamics is a good analogy for reasoning about general graph-structured data. While this seems to work well in practice, it may not capture all the nuances of how entities interact in different domains.
-
Training the model end-to-end can be computationally expensive, especially for large graphs. The authors mention some strategies to improve efficiency, but scalability may still be a concern for very large-scale applications.
-
The paper does not deeply explore the model's interpretability - how well the learned opinion dynamics correlate with the actual relationships between entities. Further analysis in this area could strengthen the theoretical foundations of the approach.
Despite these caveats, the RRGOD model represents an interesting and novel application of opinion dynamics to graph reasoning tasks. The results demonstrate the potential of this approach to uncover hidden relationships in complex, interconnected datasets.
Conclusion
This paper presents a new graph reasoning model called RRGOD that adapts opinion dynamic principles to infer latent relations between entities. By capturing the co-evolution of opinions, the model can uncover more nuanced connections compared to standard graph neural networks.
The authors show the RRGOD model outperforms baselines on tasks like link prediction and relational inference, highlighting the value of this opinion dynamics perspective for graph reasoning. While there are some limitations to consider, the work opens up exciting new directions for applying social network analysis techniques to a broader class of graph-structured data challenges.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Modeling social interaction dynamics using temporal graph networks
J. Taery Kim, Archit Naik, Isuru Jayarathne, Sehoon Ha, Jouh Yeong Chew
0
0
Integrating intelligent systems, such as robots, into dynamic group settings poses challenges due to the mutual influence of human behaviors and internal states. A robust representation of social interaction dynamics is essential for effective human-robot collaboration. Existing approaches often narrow their focus to facial expressions or speech, overlooking the broader context. We propose employing an adapted Temporal Graph Networks to comprehensively represent social interaction dynamics while enabling its practical implementation. Our method incorporates temporal multi-modal behavioral data including gaze interaction, voice activity and environmental context. This representation of social interaction dynamics is trained as a link prediction problem using annotated gaze interaction data. The F1-score outperformed the baseline model by 37.0%. This improvement is consistent for a secondary task of next speaker prediction which achieves an improvement of 29.0%. Our contributions are two-fold, including a model to representing social interaction dynamics which can be used for many downstream human-robot interaction tasks like human state inference and next speaker prediction. More importantly, this is achieved using a more concise yet efficient message passing method, significantly reducing it from 768 to 14 elements, while outperforming the baseline model.
4/11/2024
Think Deep and Fast: Learning Neural Nonlinear Opinion Dynamics from Inverse Dynamic Games for Split-Second Interactions
Haimin Hu, Jonathan DeCastro, Deepak Gopinath, Guy Rosman, Naomi Ehrich Leonard, Jaime Fern'andez Fisac
0
0
Non-cooperative interactions commonly occur in multi-agent scenarios such as car racing, where an ego vehicle can choose to overtake the rival, or stay behind it until a safe overtaking corridor opens. While an expert human can do well at making such time-sensitive decisions, the development of safe and efficient game-theoretic trajectory planners capable of rapidly reasoning discrete options is yet to be fully addressed. The recently developed nonlinear opinion dynamics (NOD) show promise in enabling fast opinion formation and avoiding safety-critical deadlocks. However, it remains an open challenge to determine the model parameters of NOD automatically and adaptively, accounting for the ever-changing environment of interaction. In this work, we propose for the first time a learning-based, game-theoretic approach to synthesize a Neural NOD model from expert demonstrations, given as a dataset containing (possibly incomplete) state and action trajectories of interacting agents. The learned NOD can be used by existing dynamic game solvers to plan decisively while accounting for the predicted change of other agents' intents, thus enabling situational awareness in planning. We demonstrate Neural NOD's ability to make fast and robust decisions in a simulated autonomous racing example, leading to tangible improvements in safety and overtaking performance over state-of-the-art data-driven game-theoretic planning methods.
6/17/2024
🎯
Asynchronous Opinion Dynamics in Social Networks
Petra Berenbrink, Martin Hoefer, Dominik Kaaser, Pascal Lenzner, Malin Rau, Daniel Schmand
0
0
Opinion spreading in a society decides the fate of elections, the success of products, and the impact of political or social movements. The model by Hegselmann and Krause is a well-known theoretical model to study such opinion formation processes in social networks. In contrast to many other theoretical models, it does not converge towards a situation where all agents agree on the same opinion. Instead, it assumes that people find an opinion reasonable if and only if it is close to their own. The system converges towards a stable situation where agents sharing the same opinion form a cluster, and agents in different clusters do not mbox{influence each other.} We focus on the social variant of the Hegselmann-Krause model where agents are connected by a social network and their opinions evolve in an iterative process. When activated, an agent adopts the average of the opinions of its neighbors having a similar opinion. By this, the set of influencing neighbors of an agent may change over time. To the best of our knowledge, social Hegselmann-Krause systems with asynchronous opinion updates have only been studied with the complete graph as social network. We show that such opinion dynamics with random agent activation are guaranteed to converge for any social network. We provide an upper bound of $mathcal{O}(n|E|^2 (varepsilon/delta)^2)$ on the expected number of opinion updates until convergence, where $|E|$ is the number of edges of the social network. For the complete social network we show a bound of $mathcal{O}(n^3(n^2 + (varepsilon/delta)^2))$ that represents a major improvement over the previously best upper bound of $mathcal{O}(n^9 (varepsilon/delta)^2)$. Our bounds are complemented by simulations that indicate asymptotically matching lower bounds.
4/16/2024
📈
Diffusion model for relational inference
Shuhan Zheng, Ziqiang Li, Kantaro Fujiwara, Gouhei Tanaka
0
0
Dynamical behaviors of complex interacting systems, including brain activities, financial price movements, and physical collective phenomena, are associated with underlying interactions between the system's components. The issue of uncovering interaction relations in such systems using observable dynamics is called relational inference. In this study, we propose a Diffusion model for Relational Inference (DiffRI), inspired by a self-supervised method for probabilistic time series imputation. DiffRI learns to infer the probability of the presence of connections between components through conditional diffusion modeling.
6/21/2024