Asynchronous Opinion Dynamics in Social Networks
2201.12923
0
0
🎯
Abstract
Opinion spreading in a society decides the fate of elections, the success of products, and the impact of political or social movements. The model by Hegselmann and Krause is a well-known theoretical model to study such opinion formation processes in social networks. In contrast to many other theoretical models, it does not converge towards a situation where all agents agree on the same opinion. Instead, it assumes that people find an opinion reasonable if and only if it is close to their own. The system converges towards a stable situation where agents sharing the same opinion form a cluster, and agents in different clusters do not mbox{influence each other.} We focus on the social variant of the Hegselmann-Krause model where agents are connected by a social network and their opinions evolve in an iterative process. When activated, an agent adopts the average of the opinions of its neighbors having a similar opinion. By this, the set of influencing neighbors of an agent may change over time. To the best of our knowledge, social Hegselmann-Krause systems with asynchronous opinion updates have only been studied with the complete graph as social network. We show that such opinion dynamics with random agent activation are guaranteed to converge for any social network. We provide an upper bound of $mathcal{O}(n|E|^2 (varepsilon/delta)^2)$ on the expected number of opinion updates until convergence, where $|E|$ is the number of edges of the social network. For the complete social network we show a bound of $mathcal{O}(n^3(n^2 + (varepsilon/delta)^2))$ that represents a major improvement over the previously best upper bound of $mathcal{O}(n^9 (varepsilon/delta)^2)$. Our bounds are complemented by simulations that indicate asymptotically matching lower bounds.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper discusses a well-known theoretical model, the Hegselmann-Krause model, for studying opinion formation processes in social networks.
- Unlike many other models, the Hegselmann-Krause model does not converge to a single agreed-upon opinion, but instead forms clusters of agents with similar opinions.
- The authors focus on the "social variant" of the model, where agents are connected by a social network and update their opinions based on the average of their neighbors' similar opinions.
- The paper analyzes the convergence properties of this model with asynchronous opinion updates, where agents are randomly activated to update their opinions.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how opinions spread and evolve in a social network, and how this can impact things like elections, product success, and social movements. The Hegselmann-Krause model is a well-known way to study this.
Unlike many other models, the Hegselmann-Krause model doesn't assume that everyone will eventually agree on the same opinion. Instead, it says that people will only find an opinion reasonable if it's close to their own. This leads to a stable situation where people with similar opinions form clusters, and people in different clusters don't influence each other.
The authors focus on a version of the Hegselmann-Krause model where people are connected in a social network, and they update their opinions by averaging the opinions of their neighbors who have similar views. This is called the "social variant" of the model.
The key finding is that this model is guaranteed to converge, even if people update their opinions one at a time in a random order, rather than all at once. The authors provide mathematical bounds on how long this convergence process will take, showing major improvements over previous results for the case where the social network is a complete graph (where everyone is connected to everyone else).
Technical Explanation
The paper analyzes the social variant of the Hegselmann-Krause model, where agents (people) are connected by a social network and update their opinions based on the average of their neighbors' similar opinions. Unlike previous work, which only looked at the complete graph social network, this paper shows that the opinion dynamics with asynchronous (random) opinion updates are guaranteed to converge for any social network.
Specifically, the authors provide an upper bound of O(n|E|^2 (ε/δ)^2) on the expected number of opinion updates until convergence, where n is the number of agents, |E| is the number of edges in the social network, ε is the maximum difference between initial opinions, and δ is the minimum opinion distance for two agents to influence each other.
For the complete graph social network, the authors show an even tighter bound of O(n^3(n^2 + (ε/δ)^2)), which is a major improvement over the previously best upper bound of O(n^9 (ε/δ)^2).
The authors complement these theoretical results with simulations that suggest the bounds are asymptotically tight, meaning they cannot be improved significantly.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough analysis of the convergence properties of the social Hegselmann-Krause model with asynchronous opinion updates. The authors' theoretical bounds on the convergence time represent a significant advancement over previous work, particularly for the case of the complete graph social network.
However, the paper does not explore the impact of the social network structure beyond the complete graph. It would be interesting to see how the convergence time scales for other network topologies, such as community-structured graphs or higher-order social interactions.
Additionally, the paper does not consider potential issues like privacy preservation or the dynamics of changing social interactions over time. These factors could be important for understanding real-world opinion formation processes.
Overall, the paper provides valuable theoretical insights into the Hegselmann-Krause model, but there is still room for further research to better understand the complex dynamics of opinion spreading in social networks.
Conclusion
This paper offers a detailed analysis of the convergence properties of the social variant of the Hegselmann-Krause model for opinion formation in social networks. The key findings are:
- The model is guaranteed to converge even with asynchronous (random) opinion updates, unlike many other theoretical models.
- The authors provide tight mathematical bounds on the expected convergence time, showing major improvements over previous results for the case of complete graph social networks.
- The theoretical results are complemented by simulations suggesting the bounds are asymptotically tight.
These insights contribute to a better understanding of how opinions spread and evolve in social networks, which has important implications for predicting the outcomes of elections, product adoption, and the impact of social and political movements. The paper lays a strong foundation for further research exploring the role of network structure, privacy, and temporal dynamics in opinion formation processes.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Opinion Dynamics for Utility Maximizing Agents: Exploring the Impact of Resource Penalty
Prashil Wankhede, Nirabhra Mandal, Sonia Mart'inez, Pavankumar Tallapragada
0
0
We propose a continuous-time nonlinear model of opinion dynamics with utility-maximizing agents connected via a social influence network. A distinguishing feature of the proposed model is the inclusion of an opinion-dependent resource-penalty term in the utilities, which limits the agents from holding opinions of large magnitude. The proposed utility functions also account for how the relative resources within the social group affect both an agent's stubbornness and social influence. Each agent myopically seeks to maximize its utility by revising its opinion in the gradient ascent direction of its utility function, thus leading to the proposed opinion dynamics. We show that, for any arbitrary social influence network, opinions are ultimately bounded. For networks with weak antagonistic relations, we show that there exists a globally exponentially stable equilibrium using contraction theory. We establish conditions for the existence of consensus equilibrium and analyze the relative dominance of the agents at consensus. We also conduct a game-theoretic analysis of the underlying opinion formation game, including on Nash equilibria and on prices of anarchy in terms of satisfaction ratios. Additionally, we also investigate the oscillatory behavior of opinions in a two-agent scenario. Finally, simulations illustrate our findings.
4/9/2024
💬
On the Principles behind Opinion Dynamics in Multi-Agent Systems of Large Language Models
Pedro Cisneros-Velarde
0
0
We study the evolution of opinions inside a population of interacting large language models (LLMs). Every LLM needs to decide how much funding to allocate to an item with three initial possibilities: full, partial, or no funding. We identify biases that drive the exchange of opinions based on the LLM's tendency to (i) find consensus with the other LLM's opinion, (ii) display caution when specifying funding, and (iii) consider ethical concerns in its opinion. We find these biases are affected by the perceived absence of compelling reasons for opinion change, the perceived willingness to engage in discussion, and the distribution of allocation values. Moreover, tensions among biases can lead to the survival of funding for items with negative connotations. We also find that the final distribution of full, partial, and no funding opinions is more diverse when an LLM freely forms its opinion after an interaction than when its opinion is a multiple-choice selection among the three allocation options. In the latter case, consensus or polarization is generally attained. When agents are aware of past opinions, they seek to maintain consistency with them, and more diverse updating rules emerge. Our study is performed using a Llama 3 LLM.
6/26/2024
🔎
Perspective in Opinion Dynamics on Complex Convex Domains of Time Networks for Addiction, Forgetting
Yasuko Kawahata
0
0
This paper revises previous work and introduces changes in spatio-temporal scales. The paper presents a model that includes layers A and B with varying degrees of forgetting and dependence over time. We also model changes in dependence and forgetting in layers A, A', B, and B' under certain conditions. In addition, to discuss the formation of opinion clusters that have reinforcing or obstructive behaviors of forgetting and dependence and are conservative or brainwashing or detoxifying and less prone to filter bubbling, new clusters C and D that recommend, obstruct, block, or incite forgetting and dependence over time are Introduction. This introduction allows us to test hypotheses regarding the expansion of opinions in two dimensions over time and space, the state of development of opinion space, and the expansion of public opinion. Challenges in consensus building will be highlighted, emphasizing the dynamic nature of opinions and the need to consider factors such as dissent, distrust, and media influence. The paper proposes an extended framework that incorporates trust, distrust, and media influence into the consensus building model. We introduce network analysis using dimerizing as a method to gain deeper insights. In this context, we discuss network clustering, media influence, and consensus building. The location and distribution of dimers will be analyzed to gain insight into the structure and dynamics of the network. Dimertiling has been applied in various fields other than network analysis, such as physics and sociology. The paper concludes by emphasizing the importance of diverse perspectives, network analysis, and influential entities in consensus building. It also introduces torus-based visualizations that aid in understanding complex network structures.
4/26/2024
Relational Reasoning On Graphs Using Opinion Dynamics
Yulong Yang, Bowen Feng, Keqin Wang, Naomi Leonard, Adji Bousso Dieng, Christine Allen-Blanchette
0
0
From pedestrians to Kuramoto oscillators, interactions between agents govern how a multitude of dynamical systems evolve in space and time. Discovering how these agents relate to each other can improve our understanding of the often complex dynamics that underlie these systems. Recent works learn to categorize relationships between agents based on observations of their physical behavior. These approaches are limited in that the relationship categories are modelled as independent and mutually exclusive, when in real world systems categories are often interacting. In this work, we introduce a level of abstraction between the physical behavior of agents and the categories that define their behavior. To do this, we learn a mapping from the agents' states to their affinities for each category in a graph neural network. We integrate the physical proximity of agents and their affinities in a nonlinear opinion dynamics model which provides a mechanism to identify mutually exclusive categories, predict an agent's evolution in time, and control an agent's behavior. We demonstrate the utility of our model for learning interpretable categories for mechanical systems, and demonstrate its efficacy on several long-horizon trajectory prediction benchmarks where we consistently out perform existing methods.
6/24/2024