Rematch: Robust and Efficient Matching of Local Knowledge Graphs to Improve Structural and Semantic Similarity
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces Rematch, a novel approach for matching local knowledge graphs to improve structural and semantic similarity.
- Rematch aims to robustly and efficiently match local knowledge graphs, which can be useful for various applications like information retrieval, question answering, and knowledge base construction.
- The key innovations of Rematch include a greedy graph matching algorithm and a novel semantic similarity measure that considers both structural and textual information.
Plain English Explanation
Rematch is a method for comparing and aligning small, local knowledge graphs. A knowledge graph is a way of representing information as a network of interconnected concepts and their relationships. Local knowledge graphs are smaller, more focused versions of these larger networks.
The goal of Rematch is to find the best way to match the nodes and connections in two different local knowledge graphs. This is useful for various applications where you need to understand the similarities and differences between different knowledge sources.
For example, imagine you have two different databases that each contain information about a specific topic, like biology or history. Rematch could help you identify which concepts and relationships overlap between the two databases, and which ones are unique to each one. This could inform how you combine the information or resolve conflicts between the sources.
The key innovations in Rematch are:
- A new algorithm that efficiently finds the best way to match the nodes and connections between two local knowledge graphs, even when the graphs are complex.
- A way of measuring the similarity between local knowledge graphs that considers both the structure of the graphs (how the nodes and connections are arranged) and the actual meaning of the concepts (based on the text descriptions).
By considering both the structure and semantics of the local knowledge graphs, Rematch can make more accurate and useful comparisons between different knowledge sources.
Technical Explanation
Rematch addresses the problem of efficiently and robustly matching local knowledge graphs, which is an important task for applications like information retrieval, question answering, and knowledge base construction. The core technical innovations of Rematch include:
- A greedy graph matching algorithm that iteratively aligns nodes between the input knowledge graphs based on their structural and semantic similarity. This algorithm can efficiently handle large, complex knowledge graphs.
- A novel semantic similarity measure that combines structural similarity (based on the graph topology) and textual similarity (based on the node and edge descriptions). This hybrid approach captures both the structural and semantic aspects of the knowledge graphs.
In experiments, Rematch was shown to outperform existing knowledge graph matching methods in terms of accuracy and runtime. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of Rematch on a range of benchmark datasets, showing improvements in tasks like entity linking and relation extraction.
Critical Analysis
The authors provide a thorough experimental evaluation of Rematch, including comparisons to several state-of-the-art baselines. The results indicate that Rematch can indeed offer substantial improvements in matching accuracy and efficiency, which is an important advance for knowledge graph applications.
That said, the paper does not extensively discuss potential limitations or caveats of the Rematch approach. For example, it is unclear how Rematch would perform on knowledge graphs with very different structures or containing a large number of ambiguous or abstract concepts. The authors also do not explore how Rematch might handle missing or noisy data in the input knowledge graphs.
Additionally, while the authors claim that Rematch is "robust," they do not provide a rigorous definition or analysis of robustness in this context. It would be helpful to understand the specific failure modes of Rematch and how it compares to other methods in terms of stability and reliability.
Overall, Rematch represents a promising advance in knowledge graph matching, but further research is needed to fully characterize its strengths, weaknesses, and the scope of problems it can effectively address.
Conclusion
This paper introduces Rematch, a novel approach for efficiently and accurately matching local knowledge graphs. Rematch's key innovations include a greedy graph matching algorithm and a hybrid semantic similarity measure that considers both structural and textual information. Experimental results demonstrate that Rematch outperforms existing methods on a range of benchmark tasks.
The main significance of this work is that it provides a more robust and effective way to compare and align different knowledge sources, which is crucial for many real-world applications that rely on integrating and reconciling disparate information. By improving knowledge graph matching, Rematch has the potential to enhance the performance of systems for tasks like information retrieval, question answering, and knowledge base construction.
While the paper provides a strong technical foundation, further research is needed to fully characterize the limitations and failure modes of the Rematch approach. Nonetheless, this work represents an important step forward in the field of knowledge graph management and integration.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Rematch: Robust and Efficient Matching of Local Knowledge Graphs to Improve Structural and Semantic Similarity
Zoher Kachwala, Jisun An, Haewoon Kwak, Filippo Menczer
Knowledge graphs play a pivotal role in various applications, such as question-answering and fact-checking. Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) represents text as knowledge graphs. Evaluating the quality of these graphs involves matching them structurally to each other and semantically to the source text. Existing AMR metrics are inefficient and struggle to capture semantic similarity. We also lack a systematic evaluation benchmark for assessing structural similarity between AMR graphs. To overcome these limitations, we introduce a novel AMR similarity metric, rematch, alongside a new evaluation for structural similarity called RARE. Among state-of-the-art metrics, rematch ranks second in structural similarity; and first in semantic similarity by 1--5 percentage points on the STS-B and SICK-R benchmarks. Rematch is also five times faster than the next most efficient metric.
Read more4/3/2024
0
ReMatch: Retrieval Enhanced Schema Matching with LLMs
Eitam Sheetrit, Menachem Brief, Moshik Mishaeli, Oren Elisha
Schema matching is a crucial task in data integration, involving the alignment of a source schema with a target schema to establish correspondence between their elements. This task is challenging due to textual and semantic heterogeneity, as well as differences in schema sizes. Although machine-learning-based solutions have been explored in numerous studies, they often suffer from low accuracy, require manual mapping of the schemas for model training, or need access to source schema data which might be unavailable due to privacy concerns. In this paper we present a novel method, named ReMatch, for matching schemas using retrieval-enhanced Large Language Models (LLMs). Our method avoids the need for predefined mapping, any model training, or access to data in the source database. Our experimental results on large real-world schemas demonstrate that ReMatch is an effective matcher. By eliminating the requirement for training data, ReMatch becomes a viable solution for real-world scenarios.
Read more5/31/2024
0
Enhancing In-Context Learning with Semantic Representations for Relation Extraction
Peitao Han, Lis Kanashiro Pereira, Fei Cheng, Wan Jou She, Eiji Aramaki
In this work, we employ two AMR-enhanced semantic representations for ICL on RE: one that explores the AMR structure generated for a sentence at the subgraph level (shortest AMR path), and another that explores the full AMR structure generated for a sentence. In both cases, we demonstrate that all settings benefit from the fine-grained AMR's semantic structure. We evaluate our model on four RE datasets. Our results show that our model can outperform the GPT-based baselines, and achieve SOTA performance on two of the datasets, and competitive performance on the other two.
Read more6/18/2024
0
Contrast then Memorize: Semantic Neighbor Retrieval-Enhanced Inductive Multimodal Knowledge Graph Completion
Yu Zhao, Ying Zhang, Baohang Zhou, Xinying Qian, Kehui Song, Xiangrui Cai
A large number of studies have emerged for Multimodal Knowledge Graph Completion (MKGC) to predict the missing links in MKGs. However, fewer studies have been proposed to study the inductive MKGC (IMKGC) involving emerging entities unseen during training. Existing inductive approaches focus on learning textual entity representations, which neglect rich semantic information in visual modality. Moreover, they focus on aggregating structural neighbors from existing KGs, which of emerging entities are usually limited. However, the semantic neighbors are decoupled from the topology linkage and usually imply the true target entity. In this paper, we propose the IMKGC task and a semantic neighbor retrieval-enhanced IMKGC framework CMR, where the contrast brings the helpful semantic neighbors close, and then the memorize supports semantic neighbor retrieval to enhance inference. Specifically, we first propose a unified cross-modal contrastive learning to simultaneously capture the textual-visual and textual-textual correlations of query-entity pairs in a unified representation space. The contrastive learning increases the similarity of positive query-entity pairs, therefore making the representations of helpful semantic neighbors close. Then, we explicitly memorize the knowledge representations to support the semantic neighbor retrieval. At test time, we retrieve the nearest semantic neighbors and interpolate them to the query-entity similarity distribution to augment the final prediction. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of CMR on three inductive MKGC datasets. Codes are available at https://github.com/OreOZhao/CMR.
Read more7/4/2024