Report on Candidate Computational Indicators for Conscious Valenced Experience
2404.16696
0
0
🔗
Abstract
This report enlists 13 functional conditions cashed out in computational terms that have been argued to be constituent of conscious valenced experience. These are extracted from existing empirical and theoretical literature on, among others, animal sentience, medical disorders, anaesthetics, philosophy, evolution, neuroscience, and artificial intelligence.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- This paper outlines 13 key conditions that are believed to be essential for conscious experience, based on existing research from various fields.
- The conditions are described in computational terms, providing a framework for understanding consciousness.
- The paper draws insights from studies on animal sentience, medical disorders, anesthetics, philosophy, evolution, neuroscience, and artificial intelligence.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a comprehensive list of 13 functional conditions that are thought to be necessary for conscious, subjective experience. These conditions are described in a way that can be understood computationally, allowing for a more rigorous and systematic study of consciousness.
The researchers have compiled these 13 conditions from a wide range of existing research, including studies on animal sentience, medical disorders, the effects of anesthetics, philosophical theories, evolutionary biology, neuroscience, and artificial intelligence. By drawing insights from such a diverse set of disciplines, the paper provides a holistic and interdisciplinary perspective on the nature of consciousness.
Technical Explanation
The paper identifies 13 key functional conditions that are believed to be necessary for conscious, subjective experience. These conditions are described in computational terms, providing a framework for understanding consciousness from a more rigorous, scientific perspective.
The researchers have compiled these 13 conditions by examining a wide range of existing empirical and theoretical literature, including studies on animal sentience, medical disorders, the effects of anesthetics, philosophical theories, evolutionary biology, neuroscience, and artificial intelligence. This interdisciplinary approach allows the paper to present a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the various factors that contribute to conscious experience.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable framework for understanding the computational underpinnings of conscious experience, but it acknowledges several caveats and limitations. For example, the 13 conditions identified may not be an exhaustive list, and there may be additional factors that contribute to consciousness that are not accounted for in this model.
Additionally, the paper notes that the precise implementation and interplay of these 13 conditions in the brain or in artificial systems is not yet fully understood. Further research and empirical validation would be necessary to refine and validate the proposed model.
Despite these limitations, the paper represents a significant step forward in the effort to computationally model consciousness. By providing a clear and systematic framework for understanding the essential components of conscious experience, the research opens up new avenues for exploration and investigation in this complex and intriguing field.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive list of 13 functional conditions that are believed to be essential for conscious, subjective experience. By describing these conditions in computational terms, the researchers have provided a valuable framework for understanding the underlying mechanisms of consciousness.
The interdisciplinary approach, drawing insights from a wide range of fields, allows the paper to offer a holistic and nuanced perspective on the nature of consciousness. While the model presented has some limitations and caveats, it represents a significant step forward in the effort to computationally model consciousness and has important implications for our understanding of the mind, cognition, and the potential for artificial consciousness.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤔
Artificial consciousness. Some logical and conceptual preliminaries
K. Evers, M. Farisco, R. Chatila, B. D. Earp, I. T. Freire, F. Hamker, E. Nemeth, P. F. M. J. Verschure, M. Khamassi
0
0
Is artificial consciousness theoretically possible? Is it plausible? If so, is it technically feasible? To make progress on these questions, it is necessary to lay some groundwork clarifying the logical and empirical conditions for artificial consciousness to arise and the meaning of relevant terms involved. Consciousness is a polysemic word: researchers from different fields, including neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, robotics, and philosophy, among others, sometimes use different terms in order to refer to the same phenomena or the same terms to refer to different phenomena. In fact, if we want to pursue artificial consciousness, a proper definition of the key concepts is required. Here, after some logical and conceptual preliminaries, we argue for the necessity of using dimensions and profiles of consciousness for a balanced discussion about their possible instantiation or realisation in artificial systems. Our primary goal in this paper is to review the main theoretical questions that arise in the domain of artificial consciousness. On the basis of this review, we propose to assess the issue of artificial consciousness within a multidimensional account. The theoretical possibility of artificial consciousness is already presumed within some theoretical frameworks; however, empirical possibility cannot simply be deduced from these frameworks but needs independent empirical validation. We break down the complexity of consciousness by identifying constituents, components, and dimensions, and reflect pragmatically about the general challenges confronting the creation of artificial consciousness. Despite these challenges, we outline a research strategy for showing how awareness as we propose to understand it could plausibly be realised in artificial systems.
4/1/2024
Neuromorphic Correlates of Artificial Consciousness
Anwaar Ulhaq
0
0
The concept of neural correlates of consciousness (NCC), which suggests that specific neural activities are linked to conscious experiences, has gained widespread acceptance. This acceptance is based on a wealth of evidence from experimental studies, brain imaging techniques such as fMRI and EEG, and theoretical frameworks like integrated information theory (IIT) within neuroscience and the philosophy of mind. This paper explores the potential for artificial consciousness by merging neuromorphic design and architecture with brain simulations. It proposes the Neuromorphic Correlates of Artificial Consciousness (NCAC) as a theoretical framework. While the debate on artificial consciousness remains contentious due to our incomplete grasp of consciousness, this work may raise eyebrows and invite criticism. Nevertheless, this optimistic and forward-thinking approach is fueled by insights from the Human Brain Project, advancements in brain imaging like EEG and fMRI, and recent strides in AI and computing, including quantum and neuromorphic designs. Additionally, this paper outlines how machine learning can play a role in crafting artificial consciousness, aiming to realise machine consciousness and awareness in the future.
5/7/2024
🤖
AI Consciousness is Inevitable: A Theoretical Computer Science Perspective
Lenore Blum, Manuel Blum
0
0
We look at consciousness through the lens of Theoretical Computer Science, a branch of mathematics that studies computation under resource limitations. From this perspective, we develop a formal machine model for consciousness. The model is inspired by Alan Turing's simple yet powerful model of computation and Bernard Baars' theater model of consciousness. Though extremely simple, the model aligns at a high level with many of the major scientific theories of human and animal consciousness, supporting our claim that machine consciousness is inevitable.
5/20/2024
🔗
Is artificial consciousness achievable? Lessons from the human brain
Michele Farisco, Kathinka Evers, Jean-Pierre Changeux
0
0
We here analyse the question of developing artificial consciousness from an evolutionary perspective, taking the evolution of the human brain and its relation with consciousness as a reference model. This kind of analysis reveals several structural and functional features of the human brain that appear to be key for reaching human-like complex conscious experience and that current research on Artificial Intelligence (AI) should take into account in its attempt to develop systems capable of conscious processing. We argue that, even if AI is limited in its ability to emulate human consciousness for both intrinsic (structural and architectural) and extrinsic (related to the current stage of scientific and technological knowledge) reasons, taking inspiration from those characteristics of the brain that make conscious processing possible and/or modulate it, is a potentially promising strategy towards developing conscious AI. Also, it is theoretically possible that AI research can develop partial or potentially alternative forms of consciousness that is qualitatively different from the human, and that may be either more or less sophisticated depending on the perspectives. Therefore, we recommend neuroscience-inspired caution in talking about artificial consciousness: since the use of the same word consciousness for humans and AI becomes ambiguous and potentially misleading, we propose to clearly specify what is common and what differs in AI conscious processing from full human conscious experience.
5/9/2024