Resolving Knowledge Conflicts in Large Language Models

Overview

• Large language models (LLMs) may encounter scenarios where their internal knowledge conflicts with information provided in the prompt context.
• This paper explores the desirable capabilities for LLMs when facing such knowledge conflicts, and evaluates how well existing LLMs fulfill these capabilities.
• The authors introduce the KNOWLEDGE CONFLICT evaluation framework to simulate and assess LLM performance in knowledge conflict scenarios.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text on a wide range of topics. However, LLMs may sometimes encounter discrepancies between their internal knowledge and the information provided in the context they are given.

For example, an LLM might have learned that the capital of France is Paris, but then be asked a question that assumes the capital is Lyon. This would create a knowledge conflict for the LLM, as its internal knowledge contradicts the information in the prompt.

The researchers in this paper believe that LLMs should be able to:

1. Identify when a knowledge conflict is present
2. Pinpoint the specific pieces of conflicting information
3. Provide distinct answers or viewpoints that acknowledge the conflict

To test how well LLMs can handle these types of knowledge conflicts, the researchers developed the KNOWLEDGE CONFLICT evaluation framework. This framework creates diverse and complex scenarios of knowledge conflicts, drawing from a variety of domains and information sources.

The researchers found that while LLMs are generally good at identifying the existence of knowledge conflicts, they struggle to pinpoint the specific conflicting information and provide distinct answers that acknowledge the conflict. This suggests that handling knowledge conflicts is an area that needs more research to improve LLM capabilities.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the KNOWLEDGE CONFLICT evaluation framework, which aims to simulate realistic scenarios of knowledge conflicts for LLMs. The framework includes:

• Diverse and complex situations of knowledge conflict, drawn from various entities and domains
• Two synthetic methods for creating knowledge conflicts in prompts
• Settings with progressively increasing difficulty to reflect real-world knowledge conflicts

The researchers conducted extensive experiments using the KNOWLEDGE CONFLICT framework to assess how well existing LLMs can:

1. Identify the existence of knowledge conflicts
2. Pinpoint the specific conflicting information segments
3. Provide distinct answers or viewpoints in the face of conflicting information

The results show that while LLMs perform relatively well at identifying the presence of knowledge conflicts, they struggle to determine the exact conflicting knowledge and produce responses that acknowledge the conflict with distinct answers.

To address these challenges, the paper proposes new instruction-based approaches that aim to augment LLMs to better achieve the three desirable goals.

Critical Analysis

The paper highlights several important limitations and areas for further research:

• The ability to handle knowledge conflicts is greatly impacted by factors such as the specific knowledge domain and the prompt text, suggesting the need for more in-depth understanding of these factors.
• Generating robust responses to knowledge conflict scenarios remains an open research question, as current LLMs fall short of the desired capabilities.
• The KNOWLEDGE CONFLICT framework, while a valuable tool, may not fully capture the complexity of real-world knowledge conflicts that LLMs may encounter.
• Further research is needed to develop more effective techniques for resolving knowledge conflicts and improving LLM performance in such scenarios.

Conclusion

This paper highlights an important challenge faced by large language models: the ability to identify, pinpoint, and respond to knowledge conflicts that arise between their internal knowledge and the information provided in the prompt context. The introduction of the KNOWLEDGE CONFLICT evaluation framework and the analysis of existing LLM capabilities in this area provide valuable insights for the research community. Addressing the challenges of handling knowledge conflicts is a crucial step towards developing more robust and reliable LLMs that can better navigate the complexities of real-world information.