Robust Data-driven Prescriptiveness Optimization

Read original: arXiv:2306.05937 - Published 6/5/2024 by Mehran Poursoltani, Erick Delage, Angelos Georghiou
Total Score

0

🛠️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper introduces a novel measure called the "coefficient of prescriptiveness" to quantify the performance of optimization techniques that leverage side information to make more anticipative decisions.
  • The authors present a distributionally robust contextual optimization model that uses this coefficient as the objective, and a bisection algorithm to solve the model.
  • They evaluate the robustness of the resulting policies against alternative methods when the out-of-sample dataset is subject to varying amounts of distribution shift.

Plain English Explanation

As the amount of available data continues to grow, researchers have developed various optimization techniques that try to use additional context or "side information" to make better decisions. This paper introduces a new way to measure how well these techniques are performing, called the "coefficient of prescriptiveness."

The coefficient of prescriptiveness has two parts: it looks at how good the decisions are compared to a reference, and how useful the side information is in making those decisions. By using this coefficient as the goal, the authors develop a new optimization model that is "distributionally robust," meaning it can handle situations where the data doesn't perfectly match the assumptions. They also present an algorithm to solve this optimization problem efficiently.

To test their approach, the authors look at a problem where they need to find the shortest path between two points. They show that their method is more robust to changes in the data distribution compared to other techniques, even when there are significant shifts in the data.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the concept of the "coefficient of prescriptiveness" as a universal, unitless measure of performance for optimization techniques that leverage side information. This coefficient captures both the quality of the contextual decisions made compared to a reference, as well as the prescriptive power of the side information itself.

To identify policies that maximize this coefficient in a data-driven context, the authors present a distributionally robust contextual optimization model. This model replaces the classical empirical risk minimization objective with the coefficient of prescriptiveness. The authors develop a bisection algorithm to solve this model, which involves solving a series of linear programs when the distributional ambiguity set has an appropriate nested form and polyhedral structure.

The authors evaluate their approach on a contextual shortest path problem, where they assess the robustness of the resulting policies against alternative methods when the out-of-sample dataset is subject to varying amounts of distribution shift. This allows them to quantify the benefits of their contextual optimization framework compared to other techniques that do not explicitly account for covariate shift.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a valuable contribution by introducing a novel performance measure, the coefficient of prescriptiveness, and demonstrating its usefulness in a contextual optimization framework. However, the authors do not provide a detailed theoretical analysis of the properties of this coefficient, such as its relationship to other performance metrics or its behavior in different problem settings.

Additionally, while the bisection algorithm presented is efficient for the specific problem structure considered, it is not clear how generalizable this approach is to other types of contextual optimization problems. The authors could have explored the computational complexity and scalability of their method in more detail.

Finally, the experimental evaluation focuses on a single application domain, the contextual shortest path problem. It would be helpful to see how the proposed techniques perform on a wider range of contextual optimization tasks, such as resource allocation, recommendation systems, or control problems, to better understand the broader applicability of the research.

Conclusion

This paper introduces an innovative measure, the coefficient of prescriptiveness, to quantify the performance of optimization techniques that leverage side information. The authors demonstrate its usefulness in a distributionally robust contextual optimization framework, which they solve efficiently using a bisection algorithm.

The results show that the proposed approach can produce policies that are more robust to distribution shifts in the data compared to alternative methods. This suggests that the coefficient of prescriptiveness and the associated optimization model could be valuable tools for practitioners and researchers working on a variety of contextual decision-making problems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🛠️

Total Score

0

Robust Data-driven Prescriptiveness Optimization

Mehran Poursoltani, Erick Delage, Angelos Georghiou

The abundance of data has led to the emergence of a variety of optimization techniques that attempt to leverage available side information to provide more anticipative decisions. The wide range of methods and contexts of application have motivated the design of a universal unitless measure of performance known as the coefficient of prescriptiveness. This coefficient was designed to quantify both the quality of contextual decisions compared to a reference one and the prescriptive power of side information. To identify policies that maximize the former in a data-driven context, this paper introduces a distributionally robust contextual optimization model where the coefficient of prescriptiveness substitutes for the classical empirical risk minimization objective. We present a bisection algorithm to solve this model, which relies on solving a series of linear programs when the distributional ambiguity set has an appropriate nested form and polyhedral structure. Studying a contextual shortest path problem, we evaluate the robustness of the resulting policies against alternative methods when the out-of-sample dataset is subject to varying amounts of distribution shift.

Read more

6/5/2024

Bayesian Nonparametrics Meets Data-Driven Distributionally Robust Optimization
Total Score

0

Bayesian Nonparametrics Meets Data-Driven Distributionally Robust Optimization

Nicola Bariletto, Nhat Ho

Training machine learning and statistical models often involves optimizing a data-driven risk criterion. The risk is usually computed with respect to the empirical data distribution, but this may result in poor and unstable out-of-sample performance due to distributional uncertainty. In the spirit of distributionally robust optimization, we propose a novel robust criterion by combining insights from Bayesian nonparametric (i.e., Dirichlet process) theory and a recent decision-theoretic model of smooth ambiguity-averse preferences. First, we highlight novel connections with standard regularized empirical risk minimization techniques, among which Ridge and LASSO regressions. Then, we theoretically demonstrate the existence of favorable finite-sample and asymptotic statistical guarantees on the performance of the robust optimization procedure. For practical implementation, we propose and study tractable approximations of the criterion based on well-known Dirichlet process representations. We also show that the smoothness of the criterion naturally leads to standard gradient-based numerical optimization. Finally, we provide insights into the workings of our method by applying it to a variety of tasks based on simulated and real datasets.

Read more

5/21/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Optimizer's Information Criterion: Dissecting and Correcting Bias in Data-Driven Optimization

Garud Iyengar, Henry Lam, Tianyu Wang

In data-driven optimization, the sample performance of the obtained decision typically incurs an optimistic bias against the true performance, a phenomenon commonly known as the Optimizer's Curse and intimately related to overfitting in machine learning. Common techniques to correct this bias, such as cross-validation, require repeatedly solving additional optimization problems and are therefore computationally expensive. We develop a general bias correction approach, building on what we call Optimizer's Information Criterion (OIC), that directly approximates the first-order bias and does not require solving any additional optimization problems. Our OIC generalizes the celebrated Akaike Information Criterion to evaluate the objective performance in data-driven optimization, which crucially involves not only model fitting but also its interplay with the downstream optimization. As such it can be used for decision selection instead of only model selection. We apply our approach to a range of data-driven optimization formulations comprising empirical and parametric models, their regularized counterparts, and furthermore contextual optimization. Finally, we provide numerical validation on the superior performance of our approach under synthetic and real-world datasets.

Read more

7/25/2024

Decision-focused predictions via pessimistic bilevel optimization: a computational study
Total Score

0

Decision-focused predictions via pessimistic bilevel optimization: a computational study

V'ictor Bucarey, Sophia Calder'on, Gonzalo Mu~noz, Frederic Semet

Dealing with uncertainty in optimization parameters is an important and longstanding challenge. Typically, uncertain parameters are predicted accurately, and then a deterministic optimization problem is solved. However, the decisions produced by this so-called emph{predict-then-optimize} procedure can be highly sensitive to uncertain parameters. In this work, we contribute to recent efforts in producing emph{decision-focused} predictions, i.e., to build predictive models that are constructed with the goal of minimizing a emph{regret} measure on the decisions taken with them. We begin by formulating the exact expected regret minimization as a pessimistic bilevel optimization model. Then, we establish NP-completeness of this problem, even in a heavily restricted case. Using duality arguments, we reformulate it as a non-convex quadratic optimization problem. Finally, we show various computational techniques to achieve tractability. We report extensive computational results on shortest-path instances with uncertain cost vectors. Our results indicate that our approach can improve training performance over the approach of Elmachtoub and Grigas (2022), a state-of-the-art method for decision-focused learning.

Read more

5/28/2024