Robust Deep Hawkes Process under Label Noise of Both Event and Occurrence

Overview

• Explains a method for making deep Hawkes process models more robust to label noise in both event and occurrence data
• Proposes a framework to handle noise in event timing, event type, and whether an event occurred at all
• Demonstrates improved performance on real-world datasets compared to baseline models

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new approach for training deep Hawkes process models that can better handle noisy data. Hawkes processes are a type of machine learning model used to predict the timing and types of future events based on historical event data.

In real-world datasets, the event data can be inaccurate or incomplete - for example, the timestamp of an event may be off, the event type may be mislabeled, or some events may be missing entirely. This "label noise" can significantly degrade the performance of standard Hawkes process models.

The proposed framework introduces several techniques to make the model more robust to these various types of noise. For example, it learns to estimate the true, underlying event data from the noisy observations. It also uses regularization methods to prevent the model from overfitting to the noise.

The authors demonstrate that their "Robust Deep Hawkes Process" model outperforms standard Hawkes models on several real-world datasets with different types of label noise. This suggests the techniques could be valuable for applying Hawkes processes to real-world applications with imperfect data.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the "Robust Deep Hawkes Process" (RDHP), a framework for training deep Hawkes process models that can handle noisy event data. Hawkes processes are a class of temporal point process models used to predict the timing and types of future events based on historical data.

The key innovation is that RDHP incorporates several mechanisms to make the model more robust to different types of label noise, including:

1. Estimating true event data: RDHP learns to estimate the true, underlying event data (timestamps, types, and occurrences) from the noisy observations. This helps the model focus on the true patterns in the data rather than the noise.

2. Noise modeling: RDHP models the noise distributions for event timestamps, types, and occurrences. This allows the model to account for and adapt to different types of noise.

3. Regularization: RDHP uses regularization techniques like dropout and L1/L2 regularization to prevent the model from overfitting to the noise in the training data.

The authors evaluate RDHP on several real-world event datasets with varying levels and types of label noise. The results show that RDHP outperforms standard Hawkes process models in terms of predictive accuracy, robustness to noise, and other key metrics.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a valuable contribution by addressing an important practical challenge in applying Hawkes processes to real-world data, which is often noisy and imperfect. The proposed RDHP framework provides a principled way to handle different types of label noise, which is a common issue in event data.

One potential limitation is that the noise modeling approach relies on assuming specific parametric forms for the noise distributions (e.g., Gaussian for timestamps, categorical for event types). While this works well in the experiments, in practice the noise characteristics may be more complex and difficult to model. An avenue for future research could be exploring more flexible, nonparametric noise modeling techniques.

Additionally, the paper does not provide much insight into the interpretability of the RDHP model. Understanding how the noise estimation and robustness mechanisms affect the learned model parameters and their interpretations could be an interesting area for further study.

Overall, the Robust Deep Hawkes Process is a promising approach that addresses an important real-world challenge in a principled way. The experimental results demonstrate its practical value, and the techniques could potentially be applied to other types of temporal point process models beyond just Hawkes processes.

Conclusion

This paper presents the Robust Deep Hawkes Process (RDHP), a framework for training deep Hawkes process models that are more resilient to label noise in event data. By incorporating techniques to estimate true event data, model noise distributions, and use regularization, RDHP can outperform standard Hawkes models on real-world datasets with various types of noise.

The work addresses a critical challenge in applying Hawkes processes to practical applications, where event data is often imperfect or incomplete. The proposed methods show promising results and could help enable the wider adoption of Hawkes process models in domains with noisy data, such as finance, social media, and healthcare. Further research into more flexible noise modeling and the interpretability of RDHP could build on these contributions.