Robust Q-Learning for finite ambiguity sets

Overview

• This paper proposes a robust Q-learning algorithm for Markov decision processes with finite ambiguity sets.
• The algorithm aims to learn an optimal policy while accounting for uncertainty in the transition dynamics.
• Theoretical guarantees are provided for the algorithm's performance in finite-horizon and infinite-horizon settings.

Plain English Explanation

Reinforcement learning is a type of machine learning where an agent learns to make decisions by interacting with an environment and receiving rewards or penalties. One popular reinforcement learning algorithm is Q-learning, which learns a value function called the Q-function that estimates the expected future reward for each possible action in a given state.

However, in many real-world scenarios, the environment's dynamics, such as how actions lead to new states, may not be fully known or may be subject to uncertainty. This paper presents a robust Q-learning algorithm that can learn an optimal policy even when there is uncertainty about the environment's transition dynamics.

The key idea is to consider a set of possible transition dynamics, called an ambiguity set, rather than assuming a single known model. The algorithm then learns a Q-function that performs well across all the transition dynamics in the ambiguity set, rather than focusing on a single, potentially inaccurate model.

The paper provides theoretical guarantees on the performance of this robust Q-learning algorithm, showing that it can converge to an optimal policy in both finite-horizon and infinite-horizon settings, even in the presence of uncertainty about the environment's dynamics.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a robust Q-learning algorithm for Markov decision processes (MDPs) with finite ambiguity sets. The ambiguity set represents the uncertainty in the transition dynamics of the MDP, where the true transition function is assumed to lie within this set.

The algorithm learns a Q-function that is robust to the uncertainty in the transition dynamics. Specifically, it minimizes the maximum expected cost across all transition functions in the ambiguity set, rather than focusing on a single, potentially inaccurate model.

The authors prove theoretical guarantees for the algorithm's performance in both finite-horizon and infinite-horizon settings. In the finite-horizon case, they show that the algorithm converges to an optimal policy with high probability. In the infinite-horizon case, they establish that the learned Q-function and policy are near-optimal.

The key technical contributions include:

1. Formulating the robust Q-learning problem as a minimax optimization problem over the ambiguity set.
2. Developing an iterative algorithm to solve this minimax problem, with guarantees on its convergence.
3. Analyzing the algorithm's performance in both finite-horizon and infinite-horizon settings, providing explicit sample complexity and regret bounds.

The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of the robust Q-learning algorithm through numerical experiments on various benchmark problems.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed and theoretically grounded approach to robust reinforcement learning in the presence of uncertainty. The authors acknowledge several important limitations and areas for future work:

1. Ambiguity Set Specification: The paper assumes that the ambiguity set of possible transition dynamics is known a priori. In practice, this may be a strong assumption, and methods for adaptively learning or bounding the ambiguity set could be an important extension.

2. Computational Complexity: The proposed algorithm involves solving a minimax optimization problem, which can be computationally challenging, especially for large-scale problems. Developing more efficient optimization techniques or approximation methods could improve the algorithm's scalability.

3. Extension to Function Approximation: The current analysis is based on tabular representations of the Q-function. Extending the robust Q-learning approach to function approximation settings, such as neural networks, would broaden its applicability to more complex domains.

4. Empirical Evaluation: While the paper includes numerical experiments, a more comprehensive empirical evaluation, including comparisons to other robust reinforcement learning methods, could further demonstrate the practical benefits of the proposed approach.

Despite these limitations, the paper presents a valuable contribution to the field of robust reinforcement learning, providing a principled framework for learning optimal policies in the presence of uncertainty about the environment's dynamics.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a robust Q-learning algorithm for Markov decision processes with finite ambiguity sets, where the true transition dynamics are assumed to lie within a known set of possible models. The algorithm learns a Q-function that performs well across all the transition dynamics in the ambiguity set, rather than focusing on a single, potentially inaccurate model.

The paper provides theoretical guarantees on the algorithm's performance, showing that it can converge to an optimal policy in both finite-horizon and infinite-horizon settings, even in the presence of uncertainty about the environment's dynamics. The key technical contributions include the formulation of the robust Q-learning problem as a minimax optimization problem and the development of an iterative algorithm to solve it.

While the paper acknowledges several limitations, such as the need for a priori knowledge of the ambiguity set and the computational complexity of the minimax optimization, it presents a valuable step forward in the field of robust reinforcement learning. By accounting for uncertainty in the transition dynamics, the proposed algorithm can learn more reliable and effective policies, which could have significant practical implications across a wide range of applications.