Robust $Q$-learning Algorithm for Markov Decision Processes under Wasserstein Uncertainty

Overview

• Presents a novel Q-learning algorithm for solving distributionally robust Markov decision problems
• Ambiguity set for transition probabilities is a Wasserstein ball around a reference measure
• Proves convergence of the algorithm and provides real-world examples to illustrate its tractability and benefits

Plain English Explanation

This paper introduces a new Q-learning algorithm that is designed to solve a specific type of decision-making problem. The problem is called a "distributionally robust Markov decision problem," which means the algorithm has to make decisions in a stochastic environment where the probabilities of different outcomes are not perfectly known.

Specifically, the algorithm assumes the transition probabilities (how likely different outcomes are) lie within a "Wasserstein ball" around a reference measure. This means the true probabilities are close to, but not exactly equal to, a set of reference probabilities. The algorithm then uses this assumption to make optimal decisions.

The paper proves that this algorithm will converge to a solution, and also provides several examples, including ones using real-world data. These examples show that the algorithm is practical to use and can provide benefits over approaches that assume the probabilities are perfectly known, especially when the estimated probabilities turn out to be wrong in practice.

The key idea is to account for the uncertainty in the probabilities, rather than assuming they are precisely known. This distributionally robust approach can lead to better decisions in the face of imperfect information.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a novel Q-learning algorithm designed to solve distributionally robust Markov decision problems. In these problems, the transition probabilities for the underlying Markov decision process are assumed to lie within a Wasserstein ball around a reference measure, which could be an estimated distribution.

The authors prove the convergence of their presented algorithm, and provide several examples, including those using real-world data, to illustrate the tractability of their approach as well as the benefits of considering distributional robustness when solving stochastic optimal control problems. The examples show that accounting for uncertainty in the transition probabilities can lead to better decisions, particularly when the estimated distributions are misspecified.

The distributionally robust formulation allows the algorithm to optimize for the worst-case scenario within the specified ambiguity set, rather than relying on a single, potentially inaccurate, estimate of the transition probabilities. This can be especially valuable when the true underlying distribution is difficult to estimate accurately.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of the convergence of the proposed Q-learning algorithm, which is a strength. The examples using real-world data also demonstrate the practical relevance and effectiveness of the approach.

However, the paper does not extensively explore the limitations of the method. For instance, the choice of the Wasserstein ball as the ambiguity set may not be appropriate in all scenarios, and the performance of the algorithm may depend on the specific parameters of the Wasserstein ball. Additionally, the computational complexity of the algorithm is not discussed in depth, which could be an important consideration for large-scale problems.

Further research could investigate alternative ambiguity sets, analyze the algorithm's sensitivity to the choice of parameters, and explore the trade-offs between solution quality and computational efficiency. Comparisons to other distributionally robust methods would also help contextualize the contributions of this work.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel Q-learning algorithm for solving distributionally robust Markov decision problems, where the transition probabilities are assumed to lie within a Wasserstein ball around a reference measure. The authors prove the convergence of their algorithm and provide examples demonstrating its tractability and the benefits of accounting for distributional robustness, particularly when the estimated probabilities are misspecified.

The key contribution of this work is the development of a Q-learning framework that can optimize decision-making in the face of uncertainty about the underlying probability distributions, which is a common challenge in real-world applications. By considering the worst-case scenario within the specified ambiguity set, the algorithm can make more robust decisions that are less sensitive to estimation errors. This distributionally robust approach has the potential to improve decision-making in a variety of stochastic control problems.