A replica analysis of Self-Training of Linear Classifier
2205.07739
0
0
š£ļø
Abstract
Self-training (ST) is a simple yet effective semi-supervised learning method. However, why and how ST improves generalization performance by using potentially erroneous pseudo-labels is still not well understood. To deepen the understanding of ST, we derive and analyze a sharp characterization of the behavior of iterative ST when training a linear classifier by minimizing the ridge-regularized convex loss on binary Gaussian mixtures, in the asymptotic limit where input dimension and data size diverge proportionally. The results show that ST improves generalization in different ways depending on the number of iterations. When the number of iterations is small, ST improves generalization performance by fitting the model to relatively reliable pseudo-labels and updating the model parameters by a large amount at each iteration. This suggests that ST works intuitively. On the other hand, with many iterations, ST can gradually improve the direction of the classification plane by updating the model parameters incrementally, using soft labels and small regularization. It is argued that this is because the small update of ST can extract information from the data in an almost noiseless way. However, in the presence of label imbalance, the generalization performance of ST underperforms supervised learning with true labels. To overcome this, two heuristics are proposed to enable ST to achieve nearly compatible performance with supervised learning even with significant label imbalance.
Create account to get full access
Overview
ā¢ Self-training (ST) is a common approach in semi-supervised learning, which aims to improve machine learning models by incorporating unlabeled data.
ā¢ Despite its widespread use, it's not well understood why and how ST can improve performance by using potentially inaccurate "pseudo-labels" for the unlabeled data.
ā¢ This study analyzes the behavior of iterative ST when training a linear classifier on binary Gaussian mixture data, using a statistical mechanics technique called the replica method.
Plain English Explanation
Self-training is a technique that allows machine learning models to improve their performance by using both labeled and unlabeled data. The idea is simple: first train the model on the labeled data, then use that model to predict labels for the unlabeled data. The model is then retrained using both the original labeled data and the newly "labeled" unlabeled data.
The paper investigates why this approach can be effective, even though the model is using potentially inaccurate "pseudo-labels" for the unlabeled data. Using advanced mathematical analysis, the researchers show that over many iterations, the small updates from the pseudo-labeled data can actually accumulate to provide useful information to the model, without introducing too much noise.
However, the researchers also find that self-training struggles when there is an imbalance in the true class labels. In these cases, the self-trained model tends to overemphasize the bias term, leading to worse performance than a model trained only on the true labeled data.
To address this issue, the researchers propose some heuristic techniques, and show that with these modifications, self-training can perform nearly as well as supervised learning, even in the presence of significant label imbalance.
Technical Explanation
The paper analyzes the behavior of iterative self-training for training a linear classifier on binary Gaussian mixture data. They use the replica method from statistical mechanics to derive a sharp characterization of the self-training process in the asymptotic limit where the input dimension and data size grow proportionally.
The key findings are:
- When the number of iterations is large, self-training can find the optimal classification direction, regardless of label imbalance, by accumulating small parameter updates.
- However, in the presence of label imbalance, self-training performs significantly worse than supervised learning, as the ratio between the weight norm and bias magnitude becomes large.
- To overcome this, the researchers introduce several heuristic techniques, and show through numerical analysis that these can allow self-training to perform nearly as well as supervised learning, even with significant label imbalance.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous mathematical analysis of self-training, shedding light on both its potential benefits and limitations. The focus on the asymptotic regime and use of the replica method are technically impressive, though this approach may limit the direct real-world applicability of the findings.
One key caveat is that the analysis is restricted to linear classifiers on Gaussian mixture data. While this allows for a tractable mathematical treatment, it may not capture the full complexity of self-training on more realistic, nonlinear datasets.
Additionally, while the proposed heuristics for addressing label imbalance show promise, their effectiveness may depend heavily on the specific problem and data distribution. Further empirical validation on diverse benchmarks would help establish the broader utility of these techniques.
Finally, the paper does not explore potential issues around model calibration or robustness when using self-training, which could be important considerations in practical applications.
Conclusion
This study offers a nuanced perspective on the self-training approach, highlighting both its strengths and limitations through a detailed theoretical analysis. The findings suggest that self-training can be a powerful technique, but also reveal challenges that must be addressed, particularly in the presence of label imbalance.
The proposed heuristic solutions represent a step forward, but further research is needed to fully unlock the potential of self-training across a wider range of machine learning problems. As the field continues to explore semi-supervised and self-supervised learning approaches, this paper provides valuable insights that can inform the development of more robust and effective techniques.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Incremental Self-training for Semi-supervised Learning
Jifeng Guo, Zhulin Liu, Tong Zhang, C. L. Philip Chen
0
0
Semi-supervised learning provides a solution to reduce the dependency of machine learning on labeled data. As one of the efficient semi-supervised techniques, self-training (ST) has received increasing attention. Several advancements have emerged to address challenges associated with noisy pseudo-labels. Previous works on self-training acknowledge the importance of unlabeled data but have not delved into their efficient utilization, nor have they paid attention to the problem of high time consumption caused by iterative learning. This paper proposes Incremental Self-training (IST) for semi-supervised learning to fill these gaps. Unlike ST, which processes all data indiscriminately, IST processes data in batches and priority assigns pseudo-labels to unlabeled samples with high certainty. Then, it processes the data around the decision boundary after the model is stabilized, enhancing classifier performance. Our IST is simple yet effective and fits existing self-training-based semi-supervised learning methods. We verify the proposed IST on five datasets and two types of backbone, effectively improving the recognition accuracy and learning speed. Significantly, it outperforms state-of-the-art competitors on three challenging image classification tasks.
4/22/2024
š
Self-Training: A Survey
Massih-Reza Amini, Vasilii Feofanov, Loic Pauletto, Lies Hadjadj, Emilie Devijver, Yury Maximov
0
0
Semi-supervised algorithms aim to learn prediction functions from a small set of labeled observations and a large set of unlabeled observations. Because this framework is relevant in many applications, they have received a lot of interest in both academia and industry. Among the existing techniques, self-training methods have undoubtedly attracted greater attention in recent years. These models are designed to find the decision boundary on low density regions without making additional assumptions about the data distribution, and use the unsigned output score of a learned classifier, or its margin, as an indicator of confidence. The working principle of self-training algorithms is to learn a classifier iteratively by assigning pseudo-labels to the set of unlabeled training samples with a margin greater than a certain threshold. The pseudo-labeled examples are then used to enrich the labeled training data and to train a new classifier in conjunction with the labeled training set. In this paper, we present self-training methods for binary and multi-class classification; as well as their variants and two related approaches, namely consistency-based approaches and transductive learning. We examine the impact of significant self-training features on various methods, using different general and image classification benchmarks, and we discuss our ideas for future research in self-training. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first thorough and complete survey on this subject.
5/28/2024
Rethinking Self-training for Semi-supervised Landmark Detection: A Selection-free Approach
Haibo Jin, Haoxuan Che, Hao Chen
0
0
Self-training is a simple yet effective method for semi-supervised learning, during which pseudo-label selection plays an important role for handling confirmation bias. Despite its popularity, applying self-training to landmark detection faces three problems: 1) The selected confident pseudo-labels often contain data bias, which may hurt model performance; 2) It is not easy to decide a proper threshold for sample selection as the localization task can be sensitive to noisy pseudo-labels; 3) coordinate regression does not output confidence, making selection-based self-training infeasible. To address the above issues, we propose Self-Training for Landmark Detection (STLD), a method that does not require explicit pseudo-label selection. Instead, STLD constructs a task curriculum to deal with confirmation bias, which progressively transitions from more confident to less confident tasks over the rounds of self-training. Pseudo pretraining and shrink regression are two essential components for such a curriculum, where the former is the first task of the curriculum for providing a better model initialization and the latter is further added in the later rounds to directly leverage the pseudo-labels in a coarse-to-fine manner. Experiments on three facial and one medical landmark detection benchmark show that STLD outperforms the existing methods consistently in both semi- and omni-supervised settings.
4/9/2024
Self-Training for Sample-Efficient Active Learning for Text Classification with Pre-Trained Language Models
Christopher Schroder, Gerhard Heyer
0
0
Active learning is an iterative labeling process that is used to obtain a small labeled subset, despite the absence of labeled data, thereby enabling to train a model for supervised tasks such as text classification. While active learning has made considerable progress in recent years due to improvements provided by pre-trained language models, there is untapped potential in the often neglected unlabeled portion of the data, although it is available in considerably larger quantities than the usually small set of labeled data. Here we investigate how self-training, a semi-supervised approach where a model is used to obtain pseudo-labels from the unlabeled data, can be used to improve the efficiency of active learning for text classification. Starting with an extensive reproduction of four previous self-training approaches, some of which are evaluated for the first time in the context of active learning or natural language processing, we devise HAST, a new and effective self-training strategy, which is evaluated on four text classification benchmarks, on which it outperforms the reproduced self-training approaches and reaches classification results comparable to previous experiments for three out of four datasets, using only 25% of the data.
6/14/2024