On the Roles of LLMs in Planning: Embedding LLMs into Planning Graphs

Read original: arXiv:2403.00783 - Published 7/29/2024 by Hankz Hankui Zhuo, Xin Chen, Rong Pan
Total Score

0

On the Roles of LLMs in Planning: Embedding LLMs into Planning Graphs

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the roles that large language models (LLMs) can play in planning tasks.
  • The researchers propose a novel approach called "Embedding LLMs into Planning Graphs" to integrate LLMs into traditional planning algorithms.
  • The goal is to leverage the rich knowledge and natural language understanding capabilities of LLMs to enhance planning performance.

Plain English Explanation

Planning is the process of figuring out a sequence of actions to achieve a goal. Traditionally, planning algorithms have relied on formal representations of the world and well-defined rules. However, the real world is often messy and complex, making it challenging to capture all the relevant information in a formal model.

This is where large language models (LLMs) come in. LLMs are AI systems trained on vast amounts of text data, allowing them to understand and generate human-like language. The researchers in this paper hypothesize that the knowledge and reasoning capabilities of LLMs could be beneficial for planning tasks.

The researchers propose a new approach called "Embedding LLMs into Planning Graphs." This involves integrating LLMs into the planning process, allowing the planner to leverage the LLM's understanding of language and the world. The idea is that the LLM can provide additional insights and guidance to the planning algorithm, helping it navigate the complex and ambiguous real-world environment more effectively.

By embedding LLMs into planning graphs, the researchers aim to create a more powerful and flexible planning system that can adapt to a wide range of planning scenarios and tasks. This could have important implications for fields like robotics, logistics, and decision-making, where effective planning is crucial.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a novel approach called "Embedding LLMs into Planning Graphs" to integrate large language models (LLMs) into traditional planning algorithms. The key idea is to leverage the rich knowledge and natural language understanding capabilities of LLMs to enhance planning performance.

The researchers propose a framework that embeds an LLM into a planning graph, a data structure commonly used in planning algorithms. The LLM is used to enrich the planning graph by providing additional information and insights about the planning domain, actions, and goals.

Specifically, the LLM is employed in three ways:

  1. Action Annotation: The LLM is used to annotate the planning actions with additional information, such as the preconditions, effects, and semantic descriptions. This helps the planner better understand the capabilities and limitations of each action.

  2. Goal Formulation: The LLM is used to interpret the natural language goal specified by the user and translate it into a formal representation that the planning algorithm can understand.

  3. Plan Evaluation: The LLM is used to evaluate the quality and feasibility of the generated plans by assessing their logical coherence, semantic plausibility, and alignment with the user's intent.

By integrating the LLM into the planning graph, the researchers aim to create a more flexible and adaptive planning system that can better navigate the complexities of real-world environments. The paper presents a detailed architecture and algorithm for the proposed approach, as well as experimental results demonstrating its potential benefits.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach for integrating LLMs into traditional planning algorithms. The researchers' key insight of leveraging the rich knowledge and language understanding capabilities of LLMs to enhance planning performance is well-motivated and aligns with the growing interest in hybrid AI systems that combine the strengths of different techniques.

However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research:

  1. Scalability: The proposed approach may face challenges in scaling to large-scale planning problems, as the integration of the LLM into the planning graph could introduce computational overhead.

  2. Robustness: The performance of the approach may be sensitive to the quality and biases of the underlying LLM, which could lead to suboptimal or even harmful planning decisions in certain scenarios.

  3. Interpretability: The use of a "black box" LLM in the planning process may make it difficult to understand and explain the reasoning behind the generated plans, which could be a concern in high-stakes applications.

  4. Formal Verification: The paper does not address the challenge of formally verifying the correctness and safety of the plans generated by the hybrid planning system, which is a crucial requirement for many real-world applications.

Future research could focus on addressing these limitations, for example, by exploring techniques for improving the scalability and robustness of the approach, or by developing methods for enhancing the interpretability and formal verification of the planning process.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach called "Embedding LLMs into Planning Graphs" that aims to leverage the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) to enhance traditional planning algorithms. The proposed framework integrates the LLM into the planning graph, allowing it to provide additional information and insights about actions, goals, and plan evaluation.

The researchers demonstrate the potential benefits of this approach, but also acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research. Addressing these challenges could lead to more robust, flexible, and interpretable planning systems that can better navigate the complexities of the real world.

The integration of LLMs into planning tasks is a promising direction for AI research, with potential applications in fields such as robotics, logistics, and decision-making. As the capabilities of both planning algorithms and language models continue to advance, the opportunities for synergistic developments in this area are likely to grow.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on š• ā†’

Related Papers

On the Roles of LLMs in Planning: Embedding LLMs into Planning Graphs
Total Score

0

On the Roles of LLMs in Planning: Embedding LLMs into Planning Graphs

Hankz Hankui Zhuo, Xin Chen, Rong Pan

Plan synthesis aims to generate a course of actions or policies to transit given initial states to goal states, provided domain models that could be designed by experts or learnt from training data or interactions with the world. Intrigued by the claims of emergent planning capabilities in large language models (LLMs), works have been proposed to investigate the planning effectiveness of LLMs, without considering any utilization of off-the-shelf planning techniques in LLMs. In this paper, we aim to further study the insight of the planning capability of LLMs by investigating the roles of LLMs in off-the-shelf planning frameworks. To do this, we investigate the effectiveness of embedding LLMs into one of the well-known planning frameworks, graph-based planning, proposing a novel LLMs-based planning framework with LLMs embedded in two levels of planning graphs, i.e., mutual constraints generation level and constraints solving level. We empirically exhibit the effectiveness of our proposed framework in various planning domains.

Read more

7/29/2024

LLMs Can't Plan, But Can Help Planning in LLM-Modulo Frameworks
Total Score

0

LLMs Can't Plan, But Can Help Planning in LLM-Modulo Frameworks

Subbarao Kambhampati, Karthik Valmeekam, Lin Guan, Mudit Verma, Kaya Stechly, Siddhant Bhambri, Lucas Saldyt, Anil Murthy

There is considerable confusion about the role of Large Language Models (LLMs) in planning and reasoning tasks. On one side are over-optimistic claims that LLMs can indeed do these tasks with just the right prompting or self-verification strategies. On the other side are perhaps over-pessimistic claims that all that LLMs are good for in planning/reasoning tasks are as mere translators of the problem specification from one syntactic format to another, and ship the problem off to external symbolic solvers. In this position paper, we take the view that both these extremes are misguided. We argue that auto-regressive LLMs cannot, by themselves, do planning or self-verification (which is after all a form of reasoning), and shed some light on the reasons for misunderstandings in the literature. We will also argue that LLMs should be viewed as universal approximate knowledge sources that have much more meaningful roles to play in planning/reasoning tasks beyond simple front-end/back-end format translators. We present a vision of {bf LLM-Modulo Frameworks} that combine the strengths of LLMs with external model-based verifiers in a tighter bi-directional interaction regime. We will show how the models driving the external verifiers themselves can be acquired with the help of LLMs. We will also argue that rather than simply pipelining LLMs and symbolic components, this LLM-Modulo Framework provides a better neuro-symbolic approach that offers tighter integration between LLMs and symbolic components, and allows extending the scope of model-based planning/reasoning regimes towards more flexible knowledge, problem and preference specifications.

Read more

6/13/2024

šŸ’¬

Total Score

0

LASP: Surveying the State-of-the-Art in Large Language Model-Assisted AI Planning

Haoming Li, Zhaoliang Chen, Jonathan Zhang, Fei Liu

Effective planning is essential for the success of any task, from organizing a vacation to routing autonomous vehicles and developing corporate strategies. It involves setting goals, formulating plans, and allocating resources to achieve them. LLMs are particularly well-suited for automated planning due to their strong capabilities in commonsense reasoning. They can deduce a sequence of actions needed to achieve a goal from a given state and identify an effective course of action. However, it is frequently observed that plans generated through direct prompting often fail upon execution. Our survey aims to highlight the existing challenges in planning with language models, focusing on key areas such as embodied environments, optimal scheduling, competitive and cooperative games, task decomposition, reasoning, and planning. Through this study, we explore how LLMs transform AI planning and provide unique insights into the future of LM-assisted planning.

Read more

9/4/2024

šŸ’¬

Total Score

0

What's the Plan? Evaluating and Developing Planning-Aware Techniques for Language Models

Eran Hirsch, Guy Uziel, Ateret Anaby-Tavor

Planning is a fundamental task in artificial intelligence that involves finding a sequence of actions that achieve a specified goal in a given environment. Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for applications that require planning capabilities, such as web or embodied agents. In line with recent studies, we demonstrate through experimentation that LLMs lack necessary skills required for planning. Based on these observations, we advocate for the potential of a hybrid approach that combines LLMs with classical planning methodology. Then, we introduce SimPlan, a novel hybrid-method, and evaluate its performance in a new challenging setup. Our extensive experiments across various planning domains demonstrate that SimPlan significantly outperforms existing LLM-based planners.

Read more

5/24/2024