Safety-Critical Control with Uncertainty Quantification using Adaptive Conformal Prediction
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the use of adaptive conformal prediction to quantify uncertainty in safety-critical control systems.
- The proposed approach combines conformal prediction with adaptive control to enable robust and reliable control under uncertainty.
- The method is evaluated on a cart-pole balancing task, demonstrating improved safety and performance compared to existing techniques.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new way to control systems that need to be very reliable and safe, even when there is uncertainty about how the system will behave. The key idea is to use a technique called conformal prediction to quantify the uncertainty in the control system's predictions.
This uncertainty information is then used to adaptively adjust the control strategy to ensure safety, even as the system and environment change over time. The authors test this approach on a classic cart-pole balancing problem, showing that it can maintain stability and safety better than existing methods.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a safety-critical control framework that combines adaptive control with uncertainty quantification using adaptive conformal prediction.
The key components are:
- A nominal controller that aims to stabilize the system.
- An uncertainty estimator based on conformal prediction that provides probabilistic bounds on the control predictions.
- An adaptive mechanism that dynamically adjusts the control strategy to ensure safety based on the estimated uncertainty.
The authors evaluate this approach on a cart-pole balancing task, where the conformal prediction-based uncertainty estimates are used to adaptively switch between different control policies to maintain stability and safety, even as the system and environment change over time.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a well-designed and thorough evaluation of the proposed approach, considering different levels of uncertainty and disturbances. However, some potential limitations and areas for further research are:
- The evaluation is limited to a relatively simple cart-pole system, and further validation on more complex, real-world safety-critical systems would be valuable.
- The adaptive switching mechanism relies on hand-tuned thresholds, which may not generalize well to other applications. Exploring more automated adaptation strategies could be an interesting direction.
- The paper does not investigate the computational complexity and real-time performance of the proposed approach, which would be crucial for practical deployment in safety-critical systems.
Overall, the research represents a promising step towards reliable and robust control systems that can quantify and manage uncertainty, but further development and testing would be needed to fully realize the potential of this approach.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel framework for safety-critical control that combines adaptive control with uncertainty quantification using adaptive conformal prediction. The key innovation is the use of probabilistic uncertainty estimates to dynamically adjust the control strategy, ensuring stability and safety even in the face of changing system dynamics and environmental conditions.
The promising results on a cart-pole balancing task suggest that this approach could be valuable for a wide range of safety-critical applications, from autonomous vehicles to industrial robotics. By explicitly modeling and managing uncertainty, the proposed method represents an important step towards more reliable and trustworthy control systems that can operate in complex, unpredictable environments.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Safety-Critical Control with Uncertainty Quantification using Adaptive Conformal Prediction
Hao Zhou, Yanze Zhang, Wenhao Luo
Safety assurance is critical in the planning and control of robotic systems. For robots operating in the real world, the safety-critical design often needs to explicitly address uncertainties and the pre-computed guarantees often rely on the assumption of the particular distribution of the uncertainty. However, it is difficult to characterize the actual uncertainty distribution beforehand and thus the established safety guarantee may be violated due to possible distribution mismatch. In this paper, we propose a novel safe control framework that provides a high-probability safety guarantee for stochastic dynamical systems following unknown distributions of motion noise. Specifically, this framework adopts adaptive conformal prediction to dynamically quantify the prediction uncertainty from online observations and combines that with the probabilistic extension of the control barrier functions (CBFs) to characterize the uncertainty-aware control constraints. By integrating the constraints in the model predictive control scheme, it allows robots to adaptively capture the true prediction uncertainty online in a distribution-free setting and enjoys formally provable high-probability safety assurance. Simulation results on multi-robot systems with stochastic single-integrator dynamics and unicycle dynamics are provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework.
Read more7/9/2024
🔮
0
Formal Verification and Control with Conformal Prediction
Lars Lindemann, Yiqi Zhao, Xinyi Yu, George J. Pappas, Jyotirmoy V. Deshmukh
In this survey, we design formal verification and control algorithms for autonomous systems with practical safety guarantees using conformal prediction (CP), a statistical tool for uncertainty quantification. We focus on learning-enabled autonomous systems (LEASs) in which the complexity of learning-enabled components (LECs) is a major bottleneck that hampers the use of existing model-based verification and design techniques. Instead, we advocate for the use of CP, and we will demonstrate its use in formal verification, systems and control theory, and robotics. We argue that CP is specifically useful due to its simplicity (easy to understand, use, and modify), generality (requires no assumptions on learned models and data distributions, i.e., is distribution-free), and efficiency (real-time capable and accurate). We pursue the following goals with this survey. First, we provide an accessible introduction to CP for non-experts who are interested in using CP to solve problems in autonomy. Second, we show how to use CP for the verification of LECs, e.g., for verifying input-output properties of neural networks. Third and fourth, we review recent articles that use CP for safe control design as well as offline and online verification of LEASs. We summarize their ideas in a unifying framework that can deal with the complexity of LEASs in a computationally efficient manner. In our exposition, we consider simple system specifications, e.g., robot navigation tasks, as well as complex specifications formulated in temporal logic formalisms. Throughout our survey, we compare to other statistical techniques (e.g., scenario optimization, PAC-Bayes theory, etc.) and how these techniques have been used in verification and control. Lastly, we point the reader to open problems and future research directions.
Read more9/4/2024
0
DADEE: Well-calibrated uncertainty quantification in neural networks for barriers-based robot safety
Masoud Ataei, Vikas Dhiman
Uncertainty-aware controllers that guarantee safety are critical for safety critical applications. Among such controllers, Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) based approaches are popular because they are fast, yet safe. However, most such works depend on Gaussian Processes (GPs) or MC-Dropout for learning and uncertainty estimation, and both approaches come with drawbacks: GPs are non-parametric methods that are slow, while MC-Dropout does not capture aleatoric uncertainty. On the other hand, modern Bayesian learning algorithms have shown promise in uncertainty quantification. The application of modern Bayesian learning methods to CBF-based controllers has not yet been studied. We aim to fill this gap by surveying uncertainty quantification algorithms and evaluating them on CBF-based safe controllers. We find that model variance-based algorithms (for example, Deep ensembles, MC-dropout, etc.) and direct estimation-based algorithms (such as DEUP) have complementary strengths. Algorithms in the former category can only estimate uncertainty accurately out-of-domain, while those in the latter category can only do so in-domain. We combine the two approaches to obtain more accurate uncertainty estimates both in- and out-of-domain. As measured by the failure rate of a simulated robot, this results in a safer CBF-based robot controller.
Read more7/2/2024
➖
0
Synthesis and verification of robust-adaptive safe controllers
Simin Liu, Kai S. Yun, John M. Dolan, Changliu Liu
Safe control with guarantees generally requires the system model to be known. It is far more challenging to handle systems with uncertain parameters. In this paper, we propose a generic algorithm that can synthesize and verify safe controllers for systems with constant, unknown parameters. In particular, we use robust-adaptive control barrier functions (raCBFs) to achieve safety. We develop new theories and techniques using sum-of-squares that enable us to pose synthesis and verification as a series of convex optimization problems. In our experiments, we show that our algorithms are general and scalable, applying them to three different polynomial systems of up to moderate size (7D). Our raCBFs are currently the most effective way to guarantee safety for uncertain systems, achieving 100% safety and up to 55% performance improvement over a robust baseline.
Read more4/4/2024