SAM 2 in Robotic Surgery: An Empirical Evaluation for Robustness and Generalization in Surgical Video Segmentation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper evaluates the robustness and generalization capabilities of the Segment Anything Model (SAM) version 2 in surgical video segmentation tasks.
- It explores the use of prompts to guide the SAM 2 model in segmenting surgical instruments from video data.
- The results suggest that SAM 2 can effectively segment surgical instruments, even in the presence of challenging factors like occlusions, tool interactions, and diverse camera viewpoints.
Plain English Explanation
The paper investigates how well the Segment Anything Model (SAM) version 2 can be used to automatically identify and outline surgical tools in video footage of medical procedures. This is an important task for assisting robotic surgery and other medical applications.
The researchers tested the SAM 2 model in a variety of realistic surgical video scenarios, including when the tools were partially obscured, interacting with each other, or viewed from different camera angles. They found that by providing the model with short textual "prompts" describing the specific tool to segment, the SAM 2 model could accurately isolate the relevant surgical instruments even in these challenging conditions.
This suggests the SAM 2 model has strong robustness and generalization capabilities that could make it useful for a range of biomedical image and video analysis tasks. The prompting approach allows the model to be flexibly applied to different surgical tools without requiring extensive retraining.
Technical Explanation
The paper evaluates the performance of the Segment Anything Model (SAM) version 2 on the task of surgical instrument segmentation in video data. SAM 2 is a powerful deep learning model that can segment arbitrary objects in images based on textual prompts.
The researchers tested SAM 2 on a dataset of surgical videos, using short phrase prompts to guide the model in segmenting specific surgical instruments. They assessed the model's ability to accurately segment the tools even when they were occluded, interacting with each other, or viewed from varying camera angles.
The results showed that SAM 2 achieved strong performance on the surgical instrument segmentation task, demonstrating its robustness and generalization capabilities. The textual prompts allowed the model to flexibly target different tools without requiring retraining.
The paper provides valuable insights into the potential of SAM 2 for medical image and video analysis applications, where the ability to accurately segment relevant anatomical structures or surgical instruments is crucial.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough empirical evaluation of SAM 2's performance on surgical video segmentation, highlighting its strengths in handling challenging real-world scenarios. However, the authors acknowledge some limitations:
- The dataset used, while diverse, may not fully capture the breadth of surgical environments and tool varieties encountered in clinical practice. Further testing on a larger and more comprehensive dataset would strengthen the generalization claims.
- The study focused on segmentation quality, but did not explore the potential impact of prompt design or the model's inference speed, which are also important practical considerations for real-time surgical applications.
- While the prompting approach allows flexibility, the authors do not discuss the effort required to curate an effective set of prompts for different surgical tools and scenarios.
Addressing these limitations in future research would provide a more holistic understanding of SAM 2's suitability for deployment in surgical robotics and other biomedical applications.
Conclusion
This paper demonstrates the promising potential of the Segment Anything Model (SAM) version 2 for surgical video segmentation tasks. By leveraging textual prompts, the model was able to accurately segment a variety of surgical instruments, even in the presence of occlusions, tool interactions, and diverse camera viewpoints.
The strong robustness and generalization capabilities of SAM 2 suggest it could be a valuable tool for assisting robotic surgery and various biomedical image and video analysis applications. The findings of this paper contribute to the growing body of research on the use of advanced AI models in the medical domain.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
SAM 2 in Robotic Surgery: An Empirical Evaluation for Robustness and Generalization in Surgical Video Segmentation
Jieming Yu, An Wang, Wenzhen Dong, Mengya Xu, Mobarakol Islam, Jie Wang, Long Bai, Hongliang Ren
The recent Segment Anything Model (SAM) 2 has demonstrated remarkable foundational competence in semantic segmentation, with its memory mechanism and mask decoder further addressing challenges in video tracking and object occlusion, thereby achieving superior results in interactive segmentation for both images and videos. Building upon our previous empirical studies, we further explore the zero-shot segmentation performance of SAM 2 in robot-assisted surgery based on prompts, alongside its robustness against real-world corruption. For static images, we employ two forms of prompts: 1-point and bounding box, while for video sequences, the 1-point prompt is applied to the initial frame. Through extensive experimentation on the MICCAI EndoVis 2017 and EndoVis 2018 benchmarks, SAM 2, when utilizing bounding box prompts, outperforms state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods in comparative evaluations. The results with point prompts also exhibit a substantial enhancement over SAM's capabilities, nearing or even surpassing existing unprompted SOTA methodologies. Besides, SAM 2 demonstrates improved inference speed and less performance degradation against various image corruption. Although slightly unsatisfactory results remain in specific edges or regions, SAM 2's robust adaptability to 1-point prompts underscores its potential for downstream surgical tasks with limited prompt requirements.
Read more8/9/2024
0
Performance and Non-adversarial Robustness of the Segment Anything Model 2 in Surgical Video Segmentation
Yiqing Shen, Hao Ding, Xinyuan Shao, Mathias Unberath
Fully supervised deep learning (DL) models for surgical video segmentation have been shown to struggle with non-adversarial, real-world corruptions of image quality including smoke, bleeding, and low illumination. Foundation models for image segmentation, such as the segment anything model (SAM) that focuses on interactive prompt-based segmentation, move away from semantic classes and thus can be trained on larger and more diverse data, which offers outstanding zero-shot generalization with appropriate user prompts. Recently, building upon this success, SAM-2 has been proposed to further extend the zero-shot interactive segmentation capabilities from independent frame-by-frame to video segmentation. In this paper, we present a first experimental study evaluating SAM-2's performance on surgical video data. Leveraging the SegSTRONG-C MICCAI EndoVIS 2024 sub-challenge dataset, we assess SAM-2's effectiveness on uncorrupted endoscopic sequences and evaluate its non-adversarial robustness on videos with corrupted image quality simulating smoke, bleeding, and low brightness conditions under various prompt strategies. Our experiments demonstrate that SAM-2, in zero-shot manner, can achieve competitive or even superior performance compared to fully-supervised deep learning models on surgical video data, including under non-adversarial corruptions of image quality. Additionally, SAM-2 consistently outperforms the original SAM and its medical variants across all conditions. Finally, frame-sparse prompting can consistently outperform frame-wise prompting for SAM-2, suggesting that allowing SAM-2 to leverage its temporal modeling capabilities leads to more coherent and accurate segmentation compared to frequent prompting.
Read more8/19/2024
📈
0
Zero-Shot Surgical Tool Segmentation in Monocular Video Using Segment Anything Model 2
Ange Lou, Yamin Li, Yike Zhang, Robert F. Labadie, Jack Noble
The Segment Anything Model 2 (SAM 2) is the latest generation foundation model for image and video segmentation. Trained on the expansive Segment Anything Video (SA-V) dataset, which comprises 35.5 million masks across 50.9K videos, SAM 2 advances its predecessor's capabilities by supporting zero-shot segmentation through various prompts (e.g., points, boxes, and masks). Its robust zero-shot performance and efficient memory usage make SAM 2 particularly appealing for surgical tool segmentation in videos, especially given the scarcity of labeled data and the diversity of surgical procedures. In this study, we evaluate the zero-shot video segmentation performance of the SAM 2 model across different types of surgeries, including endoscopy and microscopy. We also assess its performance on videos featuring single and multiple tools of varying lengths to demonstrate SAM 2's applicability and effectiveness in the surgical domain. We found that: 1) SAM 2 demonstrates a strong capability for segmenting various surgical videos; 2) When new tools enter the scene, additional prompts are necessary to maintain segmentation accuracy; and 3) Specific challenges inherent to surgical videos can impact the robustness of SAM 2.
Read more8/6/2024
0
Is SAM 2 Better than SAM in Medical Image Segmentation?
Sourya Sengupta, Satrajit Chakrabarty, Ravi Soni
The Segment Anything Model (SAM) has demonstrated impressive performance in zero-shot promptable segmentation on natural images. The recently released Segment Anything Model 2 (SAM 2) claims to outperform SAM on images and extends the model's capabilities to video segmentation. Evaluating the performance of this new model in medical image segmentation, specifically in a zero-shot promptable manner, is crucial. In this work, we conducted extensive studies using multiple datasets from various imaging modalities to compare the performance of SAM and SAM 2. We employed two point-prompt strategies: (i) multiple positive prompts where one prompt is placed near the centroid of the target structure, while the remaining prompts are randomly placed within the structure, and (ii) combined positive and negative prompts where one positive prompt is placed near the centroid of the target structure, and two negative prompts are positioned outside the structure, maximizing the distance from the positive prompt and from each other. The evaluation encompassed 24 unique organ-modality combinations, including abdominal structures, cardiac structures, fetal head images, skin lesions and polyp images across 11 publicly available MRI, CT, ultrasound, dermoscopy, and endoscopy datasets. Preliminary results based on 2D images indicate that while SAM 2 may perform slightly better in a few cases, it does not generally surpass SAM for medical image segmentation. Notably, SAM 2 performs worse than SAM in lower contrast imaging modalities, such as CT and ultrasound. However, for MRI images, SAM 2 performs on par with or better than SAM. Like SAM, SAM 2 also suffers from over-segmentation issues, particularly when the boundaries of the target organ are fuzzy.
Read more8/14/2024