Sample Complexity of the Sign-Perturbed Sums Method

Read original: arXiv:2409.01243 - Published 9/4/2024 by Szabolcs Szentp'eteri, Bal'azs Csan'ad Cs'aji
Total Score

0

🌀

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper studies the sample complexity of the Sign-Perturbed Sums (SPS) method, which constructs exact, non-asymptotic confidence regions for the true system parameters under mild statistical assumptions.
  • The standard version of SPS deals with linear regression problems, but it can be generalized to stochastic linear (dynamical) systems and nonlinear/nonparametric problems.
  • Although the strong consistency of the SPS method was previously proven, the sample complexity was only analyzed for scalar linear regression problems.
  • This paper examines the sample complexity of SPS for general linear regression problems.

Plain English Explanation

The Sign-Perturbed Sums (SPS) method is a technique used to create precise confidence regions for the true parameters of a system, even with limited data. It works by introducing small, random perturbations to the system and then looking at the signs of the resulting sums.

The basic version of SPS is designed for simple linear regression problems, but it can be extended to handle more complex settings, like stochastic linear (dynamical) systems or nonlinear/nonparametric problems. Previous research has shown that SPS is a reliable and consistent method, but the specific number of data points required for good performance (the "sample complexity") was only studied for the simplest linear regression case.

This paper takes a closer look at the sample complexity of SPS for general linear regression problems. The researchers establish mathematical bounds that describe how the size of the confidence regions produced by SPS shrinks as more data becomes available. They show that SPS achieves the optimal rate of convergence, just like the classical statistical techniques. The paper also compares the theoretical bounds to empirical results to see how well the theory matches real-world behavior.

Technical Explanation

The core contribution of this paper is an analysis of the sample complexity of the Sign-Perturbed Sums (SPS) method for general linear regression problems.

The authors first establish high-probability upper bounds for the diameters of SPS confidence regions as a function of the finite sample size. These bounds show that the SPS confidence regions shrink at the same, optimal rate as the classical asymptotic confidence ellipsoids.

To derive these results, the paper leverages the strong consistency of the SPS method that was previously proven. The analysis involves carefully bounding the deviations between the finite-sample SPS regions and their asymptotic limits.

Finally, the paper compares the theoretical bounds to the empirical sizes of the SPS confidence regions observed in numerical experiments. This comparison helps validate the tightness of the derived sample complexity results.

Critical Analysis

The key strengths of this paper are the rigorous theoretical analysis and the comprehensive empirical validation. By deriving high-probability bounds on the sample complexity, the authors provide a deeper understanding of the finite-sample performance of the SPS method.

One potential limitation is that the analysis is limited to linear regression problems, although the authors note that the SPS method can be extended to other settings like stochastic linear (dynamical) systems and nonlinear/nonparametric problems. Extending the sample complexity analysis to these more general scenarios could be an area for future research.

Additionally, while the paper demonstrates the optimality of the SPS method in terms of statistical rates, it does not provide a comprehensive comparison to alternative approaches. Investigating the relative strengths and weaknesses of SPS compared to other confidence region construction techniques could further strengthen the contribution.

Conclusion

This paper presents a detailed study of the sample complexity of the Sign-Perturbed Sums (SPS) method for general linear regression problems. By establishing high-probability bounds on the size of the SPS confidence regions, the authors show that the method achieves the optimal statistical rates of convergence.

The results provide valuable insights into the finite-sample performance of SPS and help solidify its theoretical foundations. This work can inform the practical application of SPS in a wide range of domains, from machine learning to control systems, where reliable and efficient parameter estimation is crucial.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🌀

Total Score

0

Sample Complexity of the Sign-Perturbed Sums Method

Szabolcs Szentp'eteri, Bal'azs Csan'ad Cs'aji

We study the sample complexity of the Sign-Perturbed Sums (SPS) method, which constructs exact, non-asymptotic confidence regions for the true system parameters under mild statistical assumptions, such as independent and symmetric noise terms. The standard version of SPS deals with linear regression problems, however, it can be generalized to stochastic linear (dynamical) systems, even with closed-loop setups, and to nonlinear and nonparametric problems, as well. Although the strong consistency of the method was rigorously proven, the sample complexity of the algorithm was only analyzed so far for scalar linear regression problems. In this paper we study the sample complexity of SPS for general linear regression problems. We establish high probability upper bounds for the diameters of SPS confidence regions for finite sample sizes and show that the SPS regions shrink at the same, optimal rate as the classical asymptotic confidence ellipsoids. Finally, the difference between the theoretical bounds and the empirical sizes of SPS confidence regions is investigated experimentally.

Read more

9/4/2024

Finite-Sample Identification of Linear Regression Models with Residual-Permuted Sums
Total Score

0

Finite-Sample Identification of Linear Regression Models with Residual-Permuted Sums

Szabolcs Szentp'eteri, Bal'azs Csan'ad Cs'aji

This letter studies a distribution-free, finite-sample data perturbation (DP) method, the Residual-Permuted Sums (RPS), which is an alternative of the Sign-Perturbed Sums (SPS) algorithm, to construct confidence regions. While SPS assumes independent (but potentially time-varying) noise terms which are symmetric about zero, RPS gets rid of the symmetricity assumption, but assumes i.i.d. noises. The main idea is that RPS permutes the residuals instead of perturbing their signs. This letter introduces RPS in a flexible way, which allows various design-choices. RPS has exact finite sample coverage probabilities and we provide the first proof that these permutation-based confidence regions are uniformly strongly consistent under general assumptions. This means that the RPS regions almost surely shrink around the true parameters as the sample size increases. The ellipsoidal outer-approximation (EOA) of SPS is also extended to RPS, and the effectiveness of RPS is validated by numerical experiments, as well.

Read more

6/11/2024

Finite Sample Analysis of Distribution-Free Confidence Ellipsoids for Linear Regression
Total Score

0

Finite Sample Analysis of Distribution-Free Confidence Ellipsoids for Linear Regression

Szabolcs Szentp'eteri, Bal'azs Csan'ad Cs'aji

The least squares (LS) estimate is the archetypical solution of linear regression problems. The asymptotic Gaussianity of the scaled LS error is often used to construct approximate confidence ellipsoids around the LS estimate, however, for finite samples these ellipsoids do not come with strict guarantees, unless some strong assumptions are made on the noise distributions. The paper studies the distribution-free Sign-Perturbed Sums (SPS) ellipsoidal outer approximation (EOA) algorithm which can construct non-asymptotically guaranteed confidence ellipsoids under mild assumptions, such as independent and symmetric noise terms. These ellipsoids have the same center and orientation as the classical asymptotic ellipsoids, only their radii are different, which radii can be computed by convex optimization. Here, we establish high probability non-asymptotic upper bounds for the sizes of SPS outer ellipsoids for linear regression problems and show that the volumes of these ellipsoids decrease at the optimal rate. Finally, the difference between our theoretical bounds and the empirical sizes of the regions are investigated experimentally.

Read more

9/16/2024

Private Regression via Data-Dependent Sufficient Statistic Perturbation
Total Score

0

Private Regression via Data-Dependent Sufficient Statistic Perturbation

Cecilia Ferrando, Daniel Sheldon

Sufficient statistic perturbation (SSP) is a widely used method for differentially private linear regression. SSP adopts a data-independent approach where privacy noise from a simple distribution is added to sufficient statistics. However, sufficient statistics can often be expressed as linear queries and better approximated by data-dependent mechanisms. In this paper we introduce data-dependent SSP for linear regression based on post-processing privately released marginals, and find that it outperforms state-of-the-art data-independent SSP. We extend this result to logistic regression by developing an approximate objective that can be expressed in terms of sufficient statistics, resulting in a novel and highly competitive SSP approach for logistic regression. We also make a connection to synthetic data for machine learning: for models with sufficient statistics, training on synthetic data corresponds to data-dependent SSP, with the overall utility determined by how well the mechanism answers these linear queries.

Read more

5/27/2024