(Security) Assertions by Large Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) to assist in the generation of hardware assertions, which are formal specifications that describe the expected behavior of hardware components.
- The researchers developed a benchmark called AssertionBench to evaluate the performance of LLMs in this task and conducted experiments to assess their capabilities.
- The findings suggest that LLMs can be effectively used to generate hardware assertions, which could streamline the hardware design and verification process.
Plain English Explanation
Hardware design is a complex and tedious process that involves specifying the expected behavior of different components. Hardware assertions are formal rules or constraints that describe this expected behavior, and they play a crucial role in verifying the correctness of hardware designs.
Traditionally, writing these assertions has been a manual and time-consuming task, requiring specialized knowledge and expertise. However, the researchers in this paper explored the use of large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, to assist in the generation of these assertions.
LLMs are AI models that have been trained on vast amounts of text data, allowing them to understand and generate human-like language. The researchers developed a benchmark called AssertionBench to evaluate the performance of LLMs in generating hardware assertions. They found that these models can be effectively used to generate relevant and accurate assertions, which could significantly speed up the hardware design and verification process.
This research suggests that by leveraging the power of LLMs, engineers can focus more on the high-level design of hardware systems, while the LLMs handle the tedious task of writing the necessary assertions. This could lead to faster development cycles, reduced errors, and ultimately, more reliable hardware products.
Technical Explanation
The researchers developed a benchmark called AssertionBench to evaluate the performance of LLMs in generating hardware assertions. The benchmark consists of a set of hardware design documents and corresponding reference assertions, which serve as the ground truth.
The researchers then used several LLMs, including GPT-3 and Codex, to generate assertions based on the hardware design documents. They compared the generated assertions to the reference assertions using various metrics, such as accuracy, relevance, and coverage.
The results of their experiments showed that LLMs can effectively generate hardware assertions that are highly accurate and relevant to the given design documents. The researchers also explored ways to further improve the performance of LLMs in this task, such as by fine-tuning the models on domain-specific data or incorporating additional information about the hardware design.
The researchers also developed a tool called Laurel that leverages LLMs to generate assertions in the Dafny specification language. This tool could be used to streamline the hardware design and verification process by automatically generating a substantial portion of the necessary assertions.
Critical Analysis
The research presented in this paper is a promising step towards leveraging the power of LLMs to assist in hardware design and verification. The development of AssertionBench as a standardized benchmark is particularly valuable, as it provides a way to objectively evaluate and compare the performance of different LLMs in this specific task.
However, the paper does not address the potential limitations and challenges of using LLMs for this purpose. For example, the researchers do not discuss the ability of LLMs to handle complex or edge-case scenarios in hardware design, which may require more specialized knowledge and reasoning capabilities. Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential for LLMs to introduce errors or inconsistencies in the generated assertions, and how this might impact the overall hardware verification process.
Furthermore, the paper does not provide a comprehensive comparison of the performance of LLMs to traditional, rule-based approaches to assertion generation. It would be valuable to understand the trade-offs and relative strengths of these different methods, as this could inform the best practices for integrating LLMs into the hardware design and verification workflow.
Despite these limitations, the research presented in this paper represents an important step forward in the application of LLMs to hardware design and verification. By exploring the use of LLMs to generate hardware assertions, the researchers have opened up new possibilities for streamlining and improving this critical aspect of hardware development.
Conclusion
This paper demonstrates the potential of using large language models (LLMs) to assist in the generation of hardware assertions, which are formal specifications that describe the expected behavior of hardware components. The researchers developed a benchmark called AssertionBench to evaluate the performance of LLMs in this task and found that these models can effectively generate relevant and accurate assertions.
The ability to leverage LLMs for this purpose could significantly streamline the hardware design and verification process, allowing engineers to focus more on the high-level design of hardware systems while the LLMs handle the tedious task of writing the necessary assertions. This could lead to faster development cycles, reduced errors, and ultimately, more reliable hardware products.
While the research presented in this paper is promising, there are still challenges and limitations that need to be addressed, such as the ability of LLMs to handle complex or edge-case scenarios and the potential for introducing errors or inconsistencies in the generated assertions. Nonetheless, this work represents an important step forward in the application of LLMs to hardware design and verification, and it opens up exciting possibilities for further research and development in this area.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
(Security) Assertions by Large Language Models
Rahul Kande (Texas A&M University), Hammond Pearce (University of New South Wales), Benjamin Tan (University of Calgary), Brendan Dolan-Gavitt (New York University), Shailja Thakur (New York University), Ramesh Karri (New York University), Jeyavijayan Rajendran (Texas A&M University)
The security of computer systems typically relies on a hardware root of trust. As vulnerabilities in hardware can have severe implications on a system, there is a need for techniques to support security verification activities. Assertion-based verification is a popular verification technique that involves capturing design intent in a set of assertions that can be used in formal verification or testing-based checking. However, writing security-centric assertions is a challenging task. In this work, we investigate the use of emerging large language models (LLMs) for code generation in hardware assertion generation for security, where primarily natural language prompts, such as those one would see as code comments in assertion files, are used to produce SystemVerilog assertions. We focus our attention on a popular LLM and characterize its ability to write assertions out of the box, given varying levels of detail in the prompt. We design an evaluation framework that generates a variety of prompts, and we create a benchmark suite comprising real-world hardware designs and corresponding golden reference assertions that we want to generate with the LLM.
Read more7/11/2024
0
AssertionBench: A Benchmark to Evaluate Large-Language Models for Assertion Generation
Vaishnavi Pulavarthi, Deeksha Nandal, Soham Dan, Debjit Pal
Assertions have been the de facto collateral for simulation-based and formal verification of hardware designs for over a decade. The quality of hardware verification, ie, detection and diagnosis of corner-case design bugs, is critically dependent on the quality of the assertions. There has been a considerable amount of research leveraging a blend of data-driven statistical analysis and static analysis to generate high-quality assertions from hardware design source code and design execution trace data. Despite such concerted effort, all prior research struggles to scale to industrial-scale large designs, generates too many low-quality assertions, often fails to capture subtle and non-trivial design functionality, and does not produce any easy-to-comprehend explanations of the generated assertions to understand assertions' suitability to different downstream validation tasks. Recently, with the advent of Large-Language Models (LLMs), there has been a widespread effort to leverage prompt engineering to generate assertions. However, there is little effort to quantitatively establish the effectiveness and suitability of various LLMs for assertion generation. In this paper, we present AssertionBench, a novel benchmark to evaluate LLMs' effectiveness for assertion generation quantitatively. AssertioBench contains 100 curated Verilog hardware designs from OpenCores and formally verified assertions for each design generated from GoldMine and HARM. We use AssertionBench to compare state-of-the-art LLMs to assess their effectiveness in inferring functionally correct assertions for hardware designs. Our experiments demonstrate how LLMs perform relative to each other, the benefits of using more in-context exemplars in generating a higher fraction of functionally correct assertions, and the significant room for improvement for LLM-based assertion generators.
Read more6/28/2024
💬
0
Security Code Review by Large Language Models
Jiaxin Yu, Peng Liang, Yujia Fu, Amjed Tahir, Mojtaba Shahin, Chong Wang, Yangxiao Cai
Security code review, as a time-consuming and labour-intensive process, typically requires integration with automated security defect detection tools to ensure code security. Despite the emergence of numerous security analysis tools, those tools face challenges in terms of their poor generalization, high false positive rates, and coarse detection granularity. A recent development with Large Language Models (LLMs) has made them a promising candidate to support security code review. To this end, we conducted the first empirical study to understand the capabilities of LLMs in security code review, delving into the performance, quality problems, and influential factors of LLMs to detect security defects in code reviews. Specifically, we compared the performance of 6 LLMs under five different prompts with the state-of-the-art static analysis tools to detect and analyze security defects. For the best-performing LLM, we conducted a linguistic analysis to explore quality problems in its responses, as well as a regression analysis to investigate the factors influencing its performance. The results are that: (1) existing pre-trained LLMs have limited capability in detecting security defects during code review but significantly outperform the state-of-the-art static analysis tools. (2) GPT-4 performs best among all LLMs when provided with a CWE list for reference. (3) GPT-4 makes few factual errors but frequently generates unnecessary content or responses that are not compliant with the task requirements given in the prompts. (4) GPT-4 is more adept at identifying security defects in code files with fewer tokens, containing functional logic and written by developers with less involvement in the project.
Read more6/11/2024
🗣️
0
Evaluating LLMs for Hardware Design and Test
Jason Blocklove, Siddharth Garg, Ramesh Karri, Hammond Pearce
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated capabilities for producing code in Hardware Description Languages (HDLs). However, most of the focus remains on their abilities to write functional code, not test code. The hardware design process consists of both design and test, and so eschewing validation and verification leaves considerable potential benefit unexplored, given that a design and test framework may allow for progress towards full automation of the digital design pipeline. In this work, we perform one of the first studies exploring how a LLM can both design and test hardware modules from provided specifications. Using a suite of 8 representative benchmarks, we examined the capabilities and limitations of the state-of-the-art conversational LLMs when producing Verilog for functional and verification purposes. We taped out the benchmarks on a Skywater 130nm shuttle and received the functional chip.
Read more5/7/2024