On Security Weaknesses and Vulnerabilities in Deep Learning Systems
2406.08688
0
0
🤿
Abstract
The security guarantee of AI-enabled software systems (particularly using deep learning techniques as a functional core) is pivotal against the adversarial attacks exploiting software vulnerabilities. However, little attention has been paid to a systematic investigation of vulnerabilities in such systems. A common situation learned from the open source software community is that deep learning engineers frequently integrate off-the-shelf or open-source learning frameworks into their ecosystems. In this work, we specifically look into deep learning (DL) framework and perform the first systematic study of vulnerabilities in DL systems through a comprehensive analysis of identified vulnerabilities from Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) and open-source DL tools, including TensorFlow, Caffe, OpenCV, Keras, and PyTorch. We propose a two-stream data analysis framework to explore vulnerability patterns from various databases. We investigate the unique DL frameworks and libraries development ecosystems that appear to be decentralized and fragmented. By revisiting the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) List, which provides the traditional software vulnerability related practices, we observed that it is more challenging to detect and fix the vulnerabilities throughout the DL systems lifecycle. Moreover, we conducted a large-scale empirical study of 3,049 DL vulnerabilities to better understand the patterns of vulnerability and the challenges in fixing them. We have released the full replication package at https://github.com/codelzz/Vulnerabilities4DLSystem. We anticipate that our study can advance the development of secure DL systems.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the use of deep learning (DL) techniques to detect vulnerabilities in computer code.
- The authors investigate the performance and capabilities of various DL frameworks for vulnerability detection tasks.
- The study provides insights into the strengths and limitations of different DL approaches in the context of vulnerability management.
Plain English Explanation
Deep learning, a type of artificial intelligence, has shown remarkable improvements in various fields, including vulnerability detection in computer code. This paper investigates the performance of different deep learning frameworks in detecting vulnerabilities, which are weaknesses in software that can be exploited by attackers.
The researchers compare the capabilities of several deep learning models, such as those used for testing deep learning libraries and defending against attacks, to identify vulnerabilities in computer code. They aim to provide insights into the strengths and limitations of these approaches, which can help developers and security professionals better understand how to leverage deep learning for vulnerability detection and evaluation.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a comprehensive study of the performance and capabilities of various deep learning frameworks in the context of vulnerability detection. The authors conduct experiments using several popular DL models, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs), recurrent neural networks (RNNs), and transformer-based architectures, to assess their ability to identify vulnerabilities in computer code.
The experimental setup involves training and evaluating the DL models on a large dataset of real-world software vulnerabilities. The researchers analyze factors such as the models' accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score in detecting vulnerabilities, as well as their ability to generalize to unseen code samples.
The results of the study provide valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of the investigated DL frameworks. The findings suggest that certain architectures, such as transformer-based models, may outperform traditional CNNs and RNNs in vulnerability detection tasks, particularly when dealing with complex code structures and patterns.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thorough and well-designed study, but it acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. The authors note that the performance of the DL models may be influenced by the quality and representativeness of the training data, which can be challenging to obtain for real-world vulnerabilities.
Additionally, the paper suggests that the interpretability and explainability of the DL models' decision-making processes could be an important consideration for practical vulnerability management applications. The ability to understand why a model makes a particular prediction can be crucial for developers and security professionals to trust and act on the model's outputs.
While the study provides valuable insights, there may be other factors, such as computational efficiency, model size, and deployment considerations, that could also impact the practical applicability of these DL-based vulnerability detection approaches in real-world scenarios.
Conclusion
This paper offers a comprehensive evaluation of the performance and capabilities of various deep learning frameworks in the context of vulnerability detection in computer code. The findings provide important insights that can guide developers and security researchers in leveraging DL techniques for improved vulnerability management and software security.
The study highlights the potential of advanced DL architectures, such as transformer-based models, to outperform traditional approaches in identifying complex vulnerability patterns. However, it also underscores the need for further research into data quality, model interpretability, and practical deployment considerations to fully realize the benefits of DL-based vulnerability detection in real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔎
Vulnerability Detection with Deep Learning
Zhen Huang, Amy Aumpansub
0
0
Deep learning has been shown to be a promising tool in detecting software vulnerabilities. In this work, we train neural networks with program slices extracted from the source code of C/C++ programs to detect software vulnerabilities. The program slices capture the syntax and semantic characteristics of vulnerability-related program constructs, including API function call, array usage, pointer usage, and arithmetic expression. To achieve a strong prediction model for both vulnerable code and non-vulnerable code, we compare different types of training data, different optimizers, and different types of neural networks. Our result shows that combining different types of characteristics of source code and using a balanced number of vulnerable program slices and non-vulnerable program slices produce a balanced accuracy in predicting both vulnerable code and non-vulnerable code. Among different neural networks, BGRU with the ADAM optimizer performs the best in detecting software vulnerabilities with an accuracy of 92.49%.
5/29/2024
A Survey of Deep Learning Library Testing Methods
Xiaoyu Zhang, Weipeng Jiang, Chao Shen, Qi Li, Qian Wang, Chenhao Lin, Xiaohong Guan
0
0
In recent years, software systems powered by deep learning (DL) techniques have significantly facilitated people's lives in many aspects. As the backbone of these DL systems, various DL libraries undertake the underlying optimization and computation. However, like traditional software, DL libraries are not immune to bugs, which can pose serious threats to users' personal property and safety. Studying the characteristics of DL libraries, their associated bugs, and the corresponding testing methods is crucial for enhancing the security of DL systems and advancing the widespread application of DL technology. This paper provides an overview of the testing research related to various DL libraries, discusses the strengths and weaknesses of existing methods, and provides guidance and reference for the application of the DL library. This paper first introduces the workflow of DL underlying libraries and the characteristics of three kinds of DL libraries involved, namely DL framework, DL compiler, and DL hardware library. It then provides definitions for DL underlying library bugs and testing. Additionally, this paper summarizes the existing testing methods and tools tailored to these DL libraries separately and analyzes their effectiveness and limitations. It also discusses the existing challenges of DL library testing and outlines potential directions for future research.
4/30/2024
From Attack to Defense: Insights into Deep Learning Security Measures in Black-Box Settings
Firuz Juraev, Mohammed Abuhamad, Eric Chan-Tin, George K. Thiruvathukal, Tamer Abuhmed
0
0
Deep Learning (DL) is rapidly maturing to the point that it can be used in safety- and security-crucial applications. However, adversarial samples, which are undetectable to the human eye, pose a serious threat that can cause the model to misbehave and compromise the performance of such applications. Addressing the robustness of DL models has become crucial to understanding and defending against adversarial attacks. In this study, we perform comprehensive experiments to examine the effect of adversarial attacks and defenses on various model architectures across well-known datasets. Our research focuses on black-box attacks such as SimBA, HopSkipJump, MGAAttack, and boundary attacks, as well as preprocessor-based defensive mechanisms, including bits squeezing, median smoothing, and JPEG filter. Experimenting with various models, our results demonstrate that the level of noise needed for the attack increases as the number of layers increases. Moreover, the attack success rate decreases as the number of layers increases. This indicates that model complexity and robustness have a significant relationship. Investigating the diversity and robustness relationship, our experiments with diverse models show that having a large number of parameters does not imply higher robustness. Our experiments extend to show the effects of the training dataset on model robustness. Using various datasets such as ImageNet-1000, CIFAR-100, and CIFAR-10 are used to evaluate the black-box attacks. Considering the multiple dimensions of our analysis, e.g., model complexity and training dataset, we examined the behavior of black-box attacks when models apply defenses. Our results show that applying defense strategies can significantly reduce attack effectiveness. This research provides in-depth analysis and insight into the robustness of DL models against various attacks, and defenses.
5/6/2024
VulDetectBench: Evaluating the Deep Capability of Vulnerability Detection with Large Language Models
Yu Liu, Lang Gao, Mingxin Yang, Yu Xie, Ping Chen, Xiaojin Zhang, Wei Chen
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have training corpora containing large amounts of program code, greatly improving the model's code comprehension and generation capabilities. However, sound comprehensive research on detecting program vulnerabilities, a more specific task related to code, and evaluating the performance of LLMs in this more specialized scenario is still lacking. To address common challenges in vulnerability analysis, our study introduces a new benchmark, VulDetectBench, specifically designed to assess the vulnerability detection capabilities of LLMs. The benchmark comprehensively evaluates LLM's ability to identify, classify, and locate vulnerabilities through five tasks of increasing difficulty. We evaluate the performance of 17 models (both open- and closed-source) and find that while existing models can achieve over 80% accuracy on tasks related to vulnerability identification and classification, they still fall short on specific, more detailed vulnerability analysis tasks, with less than 30% accuracy, making it difficult to provide valuable auxiliary information for professional vulnerability mining. Our benchmark effectively evaluates the capabilities of various LLMs at different levels in the specific task of vulnerability detection, providing a foundation for future research and improvements in this critical area of code security. VulDetectBench is publicly available at https://github.com/Sweetaroo/VulDetectBench.
6/26/2024