Self-Organization in Computation & Chemistry: Return to AlChemy

Read original: arXiv:2408.12137 - Published 8/26/2024 by Cole Mathis, Devansh Patel, Westley Weimer, Stephanie Forrest
Total Score

0

Self-Organization in Computation & Chemistry: Return to AlChemy

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper explores the concept of self-organization in computation and chemistry, using the concept of "AlChemy" as a framework.
  • It examines how self-organizing processes in nature and technology can lead to the emergence of complex, life-like systems.
  • The research investigates the interplay between computational and chemical dynamics, and how they can be harnessed to create artificial life-like systems.

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores the idea of self-organization - the way complex systems in nature and technology can organize themselves without centralized control. The authors use the concept of "AlChemy" to investigate how computational and chemical processes can work together to create artificial life-like systems.

They're interested in understanding the reciprocal relationship between text and life - how the dynamics of computation and chemistry can lead to the emergence of complex, life-like behaviors in artificial systems. The research examines how these self-organizing processes could be harnessed to create new kinds of technologies and materials.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes the concept of "AlChemy" as a framework for understanding the interplay between computational and chemical dynamics. The authors argue that the principles of self-organization observed in natural systems can be applied to create artificial life-like systems that exhibit complex, emergent behaviors.

The research investigates how computational and chemical processes can be combined to generate life-like behaviors in artificial systems. The authors explore the reciprocal relationship between text and life, examining how the dynamics of computation and chemistry can lead to the emergence of complex, self-organizing systems.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a compelling conceptual framework for understanding the intersection of computation and chemistry, but the practical implementation of "AlChemy" is not fully developed. The authors acknowledge the need for further research to translate the theoretical ideas into tangible applications.

Additionally, the paper does not address potential ethical concerns or societal implications of creating artificial life-like systems. As this research progresses, it will be important to consider the responsible development and deployment of such technologies.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach to understanding the self-organizing processes that underpin both natural and artificial systems. By exploring the reciprocal relationship between computation and chemistry, the authors offer a framework for creating life-like behaviors in artificial systems. While the practical applications of "AlChemy" remain to be fully developed, the conceptual insights in this paper could pave the way for innovative advancements in fields ranging from materials science to artificial intelligence.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Self-Organization in Computation & Chemistry: Return to AlChemy
Total Score

0

Self-Organization in Computation & Chemistry: Return to AlChemy

Cole Mathis, Devansh Patel, Westley Weimer, Stephanie Forrest

How do complex adaptive systems, such as life, emerge from simple constituent parts? In the 1990s Walter Fontana and Leo Buss proposed a novel modeling approach to this question, based on a formal model of computation known as $lambda$ calculus. The model demonstrated how simple rules, embedded in a combinatorially large space of possibilities, could yield complex, dynamically stable organizations, reminiscent of biochemical reaction networks. Here, we revisit this classic model, called AlChemy, which has been understudied over the past thirty years. We reproduce the original results and study the robustness of those results using the greater computing resources available today. Our analysis reveals several unanticipated features of the system, demonstrating a surprising mix of dynamical robustness and fragility. Specifically, we find that complex, stable organizations emerge more frequently than previously expected, that these organizations are robust against collapse into trivial fixed-points, but that these stable organizations cannot be easily combined into higher order entities. We also study the role played by the random generators used in the model, characterizing the initial distribution of objects produced by two random expression generators, and their consequences on the results. Finally, we provide a constructive proof that shows how an extension of the model, based on typed $lambda$ calculus, could simulate transitions between arbitrary states in any possible chemical reaction network, thus indicating a concrete connection between AlChemy and chemical reaction networks. We conclude with a discussion of possible applications of AlChemy to self-organization in modern programming languages and quantitative approaches to the origin of life.

Read more

8/26/2024

🔗

Total Score

98

Computational Life: How Well-formed, Self-replicating Programs Emerge from Simple Interaction

Blaise Aguera y Arcas, Jyrki Alakuijala, James Evans, Ben Laurie, Alexander Mordvintsev, Eyvind Niklasson, Ettore Randazzo, Luca Versari

The fields of Origin of Life and Artificial Life both question what life is and how it emerges from a distinct set of pre-life dynamics. One common feature of most substrates where life emerges is a marked shift in dynamics when self-replication appears. While there are some hypotheses regarding how self-replicators arose in nature, we know very little about the general dynamics, computational principles, and necessary conditions for self-replicators to emerge. This is especially true on computational substrates where interactions involve logical, mathematical, or programming rules. In this paper we take a step towards understanding how self-replicators arise by studying several computational substrates based on various simple programming languages and machine instruction sets. We show that when random, non self-replicating programs are placed in an environment lacking any explicit fitness landscape, self-replicators tend to arise. We demonstrate how this occurs due to random interactions and self-modification, and can happen with and without background random mutations. We also show how increasingly complex dynamics continue to emerge following the rise of self-replicators. Finally, we show a counterexample of a minimalistic programming language where self-replicators are possible, but so far have not been observed to arise.

Read more

8/6/2024

Total Score

0

Building Artificial Intelligence with Creative Agency and Self-hood

Liane Gabora, Joscha Bach

This paper is an invited layperson summary for The Academic of the paper referenced on the last page. We summarize how the formal framework of autocatalytic networks offers a means of modeling the origins of self-organizing, self-sustaining structures that are sufficiently complex to reproduce and evolve, be they organisms undergoing biological evolution, novelty-generating minds driving cultural evolution, or artificial intelligence networks such as large language models. The approach can be used to analyze and detect phase transitions in vastly complex networks that have proven intractable with other approaches, and suggests a promising avenue to building an autonomous, agentic AI self. It seems reasonable to expect that such an autocatalytic AI would possess creative agency akin to that of humans, and undergo psychologically healing -- i.e., therapeutic -- internal transformation through engagement in creative tasks. Moreover, creative tasks would be expected to help such an AI solidify its self-identity.

Read more

7/17/2024

From Text to Life: On the Reciprocal Relationship between Artificial Life and Large Language Models
Total Score

0

From Text to Life: On the Reciprocal Relationship between Artificial Life and Large Language Models

Eleni Nisioti, Claire Glanois, Elias Najarro, Andrew Dai, Elliot Meyerson, Joachim Winther Pedersen, Laetitia Teodorescu, Conor F. Hayes, Shyam Sudhakaran, Sebastian Risi

Large Language Models (LLMs) have taken the field of AI by storm, but their adoption in the field of Artificial Life (ALife) has been, so far, relatively reserved. In this work we investigate the potential synergies between LLMs and ALife, drawing on a large body of research in the two fields. We explore the potential of LLMs as tools for ALife research, for example, as operators for evolutionary computation or the generation of open-ended environments. Reciprocally, principles of ALife, such as self-organization, collective intelligence and evolvability can provide an opportunity for shaping the development and functionalities of LLMs, leading to more adaptive and responsive models. By investigating this dynamic interplay, the paper aims to inspire innovative crossover approaches for both ALife and LLM research. Along the way, we examine the extent to which LLMs appear to increasingly exhibit properties such as emergence or collective intelligence, expanding beyond their original goal of generating text, and potentially redefining our perception of lifelike intelligence in artificial systems.

Read more

7/16/2024