Sentiment Analysis of Citations in Scientific Articles Using ChatGPT: Identifying Potential Biases and Conflicts of Interest
2404.01800
0
0
🔄
Abstract
Scientific articles play a crucial role in advancing knowledge and informing research directions. One key aspect of evaluating scientific articles is the analysis of citations, which provides insights into the impact and reception of the cited works. This article introduces the innovative use of large language models, particularly ChatGPT, for comprehensive sentiment analysis of citations within scientific articles. By leveraging advanced natural language processing (NLP) techniques, ChatGPT can discern the nuanced positivity or negativity of citations, offering insights into the reception and impact of cited works. Furthermore, ChatGPT's capabilities extend to detecting potential biases and conflicts of interest in citations, enhancing the objectivity and reliability of scientific literature evaluation. This study showcases the transformative potential of artificial intelligence (AI)-powered tools in enhancing citation analysis and promoting integrity in scholarly research.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The provided paper presents a template for citing AI research papers in a standardized format.
- It covers the structure and components of a citation, including the authors, title, page numbers, and DOI.
- The paper aims to establish a consistent style for citing AI-related publications.
Plain English Explanation
The research paper you provided outlines a template for citing artificial intelligence (AI) research papers in a standardized way. Citing sources is an important part of academic and scientific work, as it allows readers to easily find and reference the original publications.
The template includes key elements such as the author names, the title of the paper, the page numbers, and the Digital Object Identifier (DOI). The DOI is a unique code that identifies the specific online version of the paper. By following this standardized format, researchers can ensure their citations are clear, consistent, and easy for others to locate the original work.
Establishing a consistent citation style is particularly important in the rapidly evolving field of AI, where new research is continuously being published. This template can help the AI research community communicate and build upon each other's work more effectively.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a template for citing AI research papers in the "PRIME AI Style". The core components of the citation include:
- Authors: The names of the paper's authors
- Title: The title of the research paper
- Pages: The page numbers where the paper appears
- DOI: The Digital Object Identifier, a unique code that identifies the online version of the paper
The template is designed to provide a standardized format that can be used consistently across the AI research community. This aims to make it easier for researchers to find and reference the original sources of the work they are building upon.
The paper was generated using LaTeXML, a tool for converting LaTeX documents into HTML. It includes links to relevant sections and a table of contents to aid navigation.
Critical Analysis
The proposed citation template is a useful step towards establishing consistent standards for referencing AI research. By providing a clear, structured format, it can help improve the discoverability and traceability of AI publications.
However, the template alone does not address other important aspects of citation practices, such as how to handle preprints, datasets, or software code that may be associated with a research paper. Additional guidelines or extensions to the template could be useful to cover these other types of AI-related outputs.
Furthermore, the widespread adoption of this citation style will depend on its acceptance and use within the broader AI research community. The authors may need to engage with key stakeholders, such as journal editors and conference organizers, to promote the template and ensure its consistent application.
Conclusion
The proposed PRIME AI Style citation template provides a valuable framework for consistently referencing AI research papers. By standardizing the key components of a citation, it can improve the clarity and traceability of AI publications. As the field of AI continues to rapidly evolve, establishing these types of citation norms can help the research community build upon each other's work more effectively.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Using ChatGPT for Thematic Analysis
Aleksei Turobov, Diane Coyle, Verity Harding
0
0
The utilisation of AI-driven tools, notably ChatGPT, within academic research is increasingly debated from several perspectives including ease of implementation, and potential enhancements in research efficiency, as against ethical concerns and risks such as biases and unexplained AI operations. This paper explores the use of the GPT model for initial coding in qualitative thematic analysis using a sample of UN policy documents. The primary aim of this study is to contribute to the methodological discussion regarding the integration of AI tools, offering a practical guide to validation for using GPT as a collaborative research assistant. The paper outlines the advantages and limitations of this methodology and suggests strategies to mitigate risks. Emphasising the importance of transparency and reliability in employing GPT within research methodologies, this paper argues for a balanced use of AI in supported thematic analysis, highlighting its potential to elevate research efficacy and outcomes.
5/16/2024
Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviews
Weixin Liang, Zachary Izzo, Yaohui Zhang, Haley Lepp, Hancheng Cao, Xuandong Zhao, Lingjiao Chen, Haotian Ye, Sheng Liu, Zhi Huang, Daniel A. McFarland, James Y. Zou
0
0
We present an approach for estimating the fraction of text in a large corpus which is likely to be substantially modified or produced by a large language model (LLM). Our maximum likelihood model leverages expert-written and AI-generated reference texts to accurately and efficiently examine real-world LLM-use at the corpus level. We apply this approach to a case study of scientific peer review in AI conferences that took place after the release of ChatGPT: ICLR 2024, NeurIPS 2023, CoRL 2023 and EMNLP 2023. Our results suggest that between 6.5% and 16.9% of text submitted as peer reviews to these conferences could have been substantially modified by LLMs, i.e. beyond spell-checking or minor writing updates. The circumstances in which generated text occurs offer insight into user behavior: the estimated fraction of LLM-generated text is higher in reviews which report lower confidence, were submitted close to the deadline, and from reviewers who are less likely to respond to author rebuttals. We also observe corpus-level trends in generated text which may be too subtle to detect at the individual level, and discuss the implications of such trends on peer review. We call for future interdisciplinary work to examine how LLM use is changing our information and knowledge practices.
6/18/2024
💬
ChatGPT v.s. Media Bias: A Comparative Study of GPT-3.5 and Fine-tuned Language Models
Zehao Wen, Rabih Younes
0
0
In our rapidly evolving digital sphere, the ability to discern media bias becomes crucial as it can shape public sentiment and influence pivotal decisions. The advent of large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, noted for their broad utility in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks, invites exploration of their efficacy in media bias detection. Can ChatGPT detect media bias? This study seeks to answer this question by leveraging the Media Bias Identification Benchmark (MBIB) to assess ChatGPT's competency in distinguishing six categories of media bias, juxtaposed against fine-tuned models such as BART, ConvBERT, and GPT-2. The findings present a dichotomy: ChatGPT performs at par with fine-tuned models in detecting hate speech and text-level context bias, yet faces difficulties with subtler elements of other bias detections, namely, fake news, racial, gender, and cognitive biases.
4/1/2024
🛠️
Optimization Techniques for Sentiment Analysis Based on LLM (GPT-3)
Tong Zhan, Chenxi Shi, Yadong Shi, Huixiang Li, Yiyu Lin
0
0
With the rapid development of natural language processing (NLP) technology, large-scale pre-trained language models such as GPT-3 have become a popular research object in NLP field. This paper aims to explore sentiment analysis optimization techniques based on large pre-trained language models such as GPT-3 to improve model performance and effect and further promote the development of natural language processing (NLP). By introducing the importance of sentiment analysis and the limitations of traditional methods, GPT-3 and Fine-tuning techniques are introduced in this paper, and their applications in sentiment analysis are explained in detail. The experimental results show that the Fine-tuning technique can optimize GPT-3 model and obtain good performance in sentiment analysis task. This study provides an important reference for future sentiment analysis using large-scale language models.
5/17/2024