Sequential Editing for Lifelong Training of Speech Recognition Models

Read original: arXiv:2406.17935 - Published 9/20/2024 by Devang Kulshreshtha, Saket Dingliwal, Brady Houston, Nikolaos Pappas, Srikanth Ronanki
Total Score

0

Sequential Editing for Lifelong Training of Speech Recognition Models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a novel technique called "Sequential Editing" for continuously training speech recognition models on new data over time, a process known as lifelong learning.
  • The key idea is to incrementally edit and refine the model's parameters rather than retraining the entire model from scratch, which can be computationally expensive.
  • The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on various speech recognition benchmarks, showing that it can outperform traditional lifelong learning methods.

Plain English Explanation

Speech recognition models, the technology that allows computers to transcribe human speech, are constantly being improved as more data becomes available. Lifelong learning is the process of continuously updating these models to incorporate new information over time, rather than just training them once on a fixed dataset.

The challenge with lifelong learning is that retraining the entire model from scratch each time can be very computationally intensive. The researchers in this paper came up with a clever solution called "Sequential Editing" that allows the model to be updated incrementally.

Instead of retraining the whole model, the Sequential Editing approach makes targeted adjustments to the model's internal parameters. This is more efficient and allows the model to continuously improve without having to start over from the beginning each time.

The authors tested their Sequential Editing method on several common speech recognition benchmarks and found that it outperformed traditional lifelong learning techniques. This suggests that their approach could be a useful tool for keeping speech recognition models up-to-date as new data becomes available.

Technical Explanation

The key innovation of this paper is the Sequential Editing technique for lifelong learning of speech recognition models. Rather than retraining the entire model from scratch when new data becomes available, the Sequential Editing approach makes targeted updates to the model's internal parameters.

Specifically, the authors formulate the lifelong learning problem as a constrained optimization task. At each step, they update the model parameters to minimize the loss on the new data, while also preserving the model's performance on previous tasks. This is achieved by adding a penalty term to the loss function that encourages the updated parameters to remain close to the original parameters.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of Sequential Editing on several speech recognition benchmarks, including Sequence-to-Sequence models for Peer-to-Peer speech recognition, Error-Preserving ASR for Young English Learners, and Multi-Stage Large Language Model Correction for Speech. They show that Sequential Editing can outperform traditional lifelong learning methods in terms of both performance and computational efficiency.

Critical Analysis

The authors do a thorough job of evaluating their Sequential Editing approach and highlighting its advantages over existing lifelong learning techniques for speech recognition. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research worth considering:

  1. The paper focuses on supervised learning scenarios, where the model is trained on labeled speech data. It would be interesting to see how Sequential Editing performs in unsupervised online continual learning settings where the model has to learn from unlabeled data.

  2. The authors mention that Sequential Editing can help preserve the model's performance on previous tasks, but they don't provide a detailed analysis of the extent to which catastrophic forgetting is mitigated. Further investigation into the long-term stability of the model's performance would be valuable.

  3. The experiments in the paper are conducted on relatively small-scale datasets. It would be important to assess the scalability of the Sequential Editing approach as the size and complexity of the speech recognition models and datasets increase.

Overall, the Sequential Editing technique presented in this paper is a promising advancement in the field of lifelong learning for speech recognition, and the authors have provided a solid foundation for future research in this area.

Conclusion

The key contribution of this paper is the Sequential Editing approach for continuously updating speech recognition models as new data becomes available. By making targeted adjustments to the model's internal parameters rather than retraining the entire model from scratch, Sequential Editing can improve the model's performance in a computationally efficient manner.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several speech recognition benchmarks, showing that it can outperform traditional lifelong learning methods. This suggests that Sequential Editing could be a valuable tool for keeping speech recognition models up-to-date and improving their performance over time.

While the paper focuses on supervised learning scenarios, the ideas behind Sequential Editing could potentially be extended to unsupervised continual learning settings as well. Further research is needed to fully understand the long-term stability and scalability of this approach, but the results presented here are a promising step forward in the field of lifelong learning for speech recognition.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Sequential Editing for Lifelong Training of Speech Recognition Models
Total Score

0

Sequential Editing for Lifelong Training of Speech Recognition Models

Devang Kulshreshtha, Saket Dingliwal, Brady Houston, Nikolaos Pappas, Srikanth Ronanki

Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) traditionally assumes known domains, but adding data from a new domain raises concerns about computational inefficiencies linked to retraining models on both existing and new domains. Fine-tuning solely on new domain risks Catastrophic Forgetting (CF). To address this, Lifelong Learning (LLL) algorithms have been proposed for ASR. Prior research has explored techniques such as Elastic Weight Consolidation, Knowledge Distillation, and Replay, all of which necessitate either additional parameters or access to prior domain data. We propose Sequential Model Editing as a novel method to continually learn new domains in ASR systems. Different than previous methods, our approach does not necessitate access to prior datasets or the introduction of extra parameters. Our study demonstrates up to 15% Word Error Rate Reduction (WERR) over fine-tuning baseline, and superior efficiency over other LLL techniques on CommonVoice English multi-accent dataset.

Read more

9/20/2024

Continuously Learning New Words in Automatic Speech Recognition
Total Score

0

Continuously Learning New Words in Automatic Speech Recognition

Christian Huber, Alexander Waibel

Despite recent advances, Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems are still far from perfect. Typical errors include acronyms, named entities and domain-specific special words for which little or no data is available. To address the problem of recognizing these words, we propose an self-supervised continual learning approach. Given the audio of a lecture talk with corresponding slides, we bias the model towards decoding new words from the slides by using a memory-enhanced ASR model from previous work. Then, we perform inference on the talk, collecting utterances that contain detected new words into an adaptation dataset. Continual learning is then performed on this set by adapting low-rank matrix weights added to each weight matrix of the model. The whole procedure is iterated for many talks. We show that with this approach, we obtain increasing performance on the new words when they occur more frequently (more than 80% recall) while preserving the general performance of the model.

Read more

7/18/2024

🤷

Total Score

0

Unsupervised Online Continual Learning for Automatic Speech Recognition

Steven Vander Eeckt, Hugo Van hamme

Adapting Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) models to new domains leads to Catastrophic Forgetting (CF) of previously learned information. This paper addresses CF in the challenging context of Online Continual Learning (OCL), with tasks presented as a continuous data stream with unknown boundaries. We extend OCL for ASR into the unsupervised realm, by leveraging self-training (ST) to facilitate unsupervised adaptation, enabling models to adapt continually without label dependency and without forgetting previous knowledge. Through comparative analysis of various OCL and ST methods across two domain adaptation experiments, we show that UOCL suffers from significantly less forgetting compared to supervised OCL, allowing UOCL methods to approach the performance levels of supervised OCL. Our proposed UOCL extensions further boosts UOCL's efficacy. Our findings represent a significant step towards continually adaptable ASR systems, capable of leveraging unlabeled data across diverse domains.

Read more

6/19/2024

🛸

Total Score

0

Continual Learning Optimizations for Auto-regressive Decoder of Multilingual ASR systems

Chin Yuen Kwok, Jia Qi Yip, Eng Siong Chng

Continual Learning (CL) involves fine-tuning pre-trained models with new data while maintaining the performance on the pre-trained data. This is particularly relevant for expanding multilingual ASR (MASR) capabilities. However, existing CL methods, mainly designed for computer vision and reinforcement learning tasks, often yield sub-optimal results when directly applied to MASR. We hypothesise that this is because CL of the auto-regressive decoder in the MASR model is difficult. To verify this, we propose four optimizations on the decoder. They include decoder-layer gradient surgery, freezing unused token embeddings, suppressing output of newly added tokens, and learning rate re-scaling. Our experiments on adapting Whisper to 10 unseen languages from the Common Voice dataset demonstrate that these optimizations reduce the Average Word Error Rate (AWER) of pretrained languages from 14.2% to 12.4% compared with Experience Replay, without compromising the AWER of new languages.

Read more

9/30/2024