Sharp Bounds for Sequential Federated Learning on Heterogeneous Data

Read original: arXiv:2405.01142 - Published 5/3/2024 by Yipeng Li, Xinchen Lyu

📶

Overview

The paper explores two paradigms in Federated Learning (FL): parallel FL (PFL) and sequential FL (SFL)
PFL trains models in parallel across clients, while SFL trains models sequentially
The convergence theory of SFL on heterogeneous data is still lacking, compared to PFL
The paper aims to resolve the theoretical dilemma of SFL by establishing sharp convergence guarantees with upper and lower bounds

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses two different approaches to Federated Learning (FL), a machine learning technique where models are trained across multiple devices or clients without centralized data. In parallel FL (PFL), the models are trained simultaneously across the clients. In sequential FL (SFL), the models are trained one after the other, in a sequential manner.

While the convergence properties of PFL are well-understood, the same is not true for SFL, especially when the data across clients is heterogeneous (i.e., different). To address this gap, the paper establishes strong theoretical guarantees for the convergence of SFL on heterogeneous data, providing both upper and lower bounds.

Specifically, the authors derive upper bounds for three types of objective functions: strongly convex, general convex, and non-convex. They also construct matching lower bounds for the strongly convex and general convex cases. By comparing the upper bounds of SFL and PFL, the paper shows that SFL can actually outperform PFL, especially when the level of data heterogeneity is relatively high.

The experimental results, using quadratic functions and real-world datasets, validate this somewhat counterintuitive finding that SFL can be superior to PFL in certain scenarios.

Technical Explanation

The paper establishes sharp convergence guarantees for sequential Federated Learning (SFL) on heterogeneous data, providing both upper and lower bounds. This is in contrast to the well-studied parallel Federated Learning (PFL), where the convergence theory is more developed.

The authors derive upper bounds for three types of objective functions: strongly convex, general convex, and non-convex. They also construct matching lower bounds for the strongly convex and general convex cases. By comparing the upper bounds of SFL and PFL, the paper shows that SFL can outperform PFL, at least when the level of data heterogeneity is relatively high.

The experimental results, using quadratic functions and real-world datasets, validate this somewhat counterintuitive finding that SFL can be superior to PFL in certain scenarios.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a strong theoretical foundation for sequential Federated Learning (SFL) on heterogeneous data, which is an important contribution to the field. However, the authors acknowledge that the convergence analysis is limited to specific objective function classes, and more work is needed to understand SFL in more general settings.

Additionally, the paper does not discuss the practical implications of these findings, such as the impact on model performance, communication efficiency, or privacy preservation. It would be valuable to explore these aspects in future research to understand the real-world applicability of SFL.

The authors also note that the lower bound constructions are not tight for the general convex case, suggesting that further refinements may be possible. Tightening these bounds could lead to a more comprehensive understanding of the fundamental limits of SFL.

Conclusion

This paper makes a significant contribution to the theoretical understanding of sequential Federated Learning (SFL) by establishing sharp convergence guarantees with both upper and lower bounds. The finding that SFL can outperform parallel Federated Learning (PFL) in certain scenarios is an important and counterintuitive result, with potential implications for the design of practical FL systems.

While the paper focuses on the theoretical aspects, future research could explore the practical ramifications of these findings, such as the impact on model performance, communication efficiency, and privacy preservation. Additionally, further refinements to the lower bound constructions could lead to a more comprehensive understanding of the fundamental limits of SFL.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📶

Sharp Bounds for Sequential Federated Learning on Heterogeneous Data

Yipeng Li, Xinchen Lyu

There are two paradigms in Federated Learning (FL): parallel FL (PFL), where models are trained in a parallel manner across clients; and sequential FL (SFL), where models are trained in a sequential manner across clients. In contrast to that of PFL, the convergence theory of SFL on heterogeneous data is still lacking. To resolve the theoretical dilemma of SFL, we establish sharp convergence guarantees for SFL on heterogeneous data with both upper and lower bounds. Specifically, we derive the upper bounds for strongly convex, general convex and non-convex objective functions, and construct the matching lower bounds for the strongly convex and general convex objective functions. Then, we compare the upper bounds of SFL with those of PFL, showing that SFL outperforms PFL (at least, when the level of heterogeneity is relatively high). Experimental results on quadratic functions and real data sets validate the counterintuitive comparison result.

5/3/2024

📶

Convergence Analysis of Sequential Federated Learning on Heterogeneous Data

Yipeng Li, Xinchen Lyu

There are two categories of methods in Federated Learning (FL) for joint training across multiple clients: i) parallel FL (PFL), where clients train models in a parallel manner; and ii) sequential FL (SFL), where clients train models in a sequential manner. In contrast to that of PFL, the convergence theory of SFL on heterogeneous data is still lacking. In this paper, we establish the convergence guarantees of SFL for strongly/general/non-convex objectives on heterogeneous data. The convergence guarantees of SFL are better than that of PFL on heterogeneous data with both full and partial client participation. Experimental results validate the counterintuitive analysis result that SFL outperforms PFL on extremely heterogeneous data in cross-device settings.

5/9/2024

Sequential Federated Learning in Hierarchical Architecture on Non-IID Datasets

Xingrun Yan, Shiyuan Zuo, Rongfei Fan, Han Hu, Li Shen, Puning Zhao, Yong Luo

In a real federated learning (FL) system, communication overhead for passing model parameters between the clients and the parameter server (PS) is often a bottleneck. Hierarchical federated learning (HFL) that poses multiple edge servers (ESs) between clients and the PS can partially alleviate communication pressure but still needs the aggregation of model parameters from multiple ESs at the PS. To further reduce communication overhead, we bring sequential FL (SFL) into HFL for the first time, which removes the central PS and enables the model training to be completed only through passing the global model between two adjacent ESs for each iteration, and propose a novel algorithm adaptive to such a combinational framework, referred to as Fed-CHS. Convergence results are derived for strongly convex and non-convex loss functions under various data heterogeneity setups, which show comparable convergence performance with the algorithms for HFL or SFL solely. Experimental results provide evidence of the superiority of our proposed Fed-CHS on both communication overhead saving and test accuracy over baseline methods.

8/20/2024

One-Shot Sequential Federated Learning for Non-IID Data by Enhancing Local Model Diversity

Naibo Wang, Yuchen Deng, Wenjie Feng, Shichen Fan, Jianwei Yin, See-Kiong Ng

Traditional federated learning mainly focuses on parallel settings (PFL), which can suffer significant communication and computation costs. In contrast, one-shot and sequential federated learning (SFL) have emerged as innovative paradigms to alleviate these costs. However, the issue of non-IID (Independent and Identically Distributed) data persists as a significant challenge in one-shot and SFL settings, exacerbated by the restricted communication between clients. In this paper, we improve the one-shot sequential federated learning for non-IID data by proposing a local model diversity-enhancing strategy. Specifically, to leverage the potential of local model diversity for improving model performance, we introduce a local model pool for each client that comprises diverse models generated during local training, and propose two distance measurements to further enhance the model diversity and mitigate the effect of non-IID data. Consequently, our proposed framework can improve the global model performance while maintaining low communication costs. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method exhibits superior performance to existing one-shot PFL methods and achieves better accuracy compared with state-of-the-art one-shot SFL methods on both label-skew and domain-shift tasks (e.g., 6%+ accuracy improvement on the CIFAR-10 dataset).

4/19/2024