Sharp Generalization of Transductive Learning: A Transductive Local Rademacher Complexity Approach
2309.16858
0
0
🔗
Abstract
We introduce a new tool, Transductive Local Complexity (TLC), designed to analyze the generalization performance of transductive learning methods and inspire the development of new algorithms in this domain. Our work extends the concept of the popular Local Rademacher Complexity (LRC) to the transductive setting, incorporating significant and novel modifications compared to the typical analysis of LRC methods in the inductive setting. While LRC has been widely used as a powerful tool for analyzing inductive models, providing sharp generalization bounds for classification and minimax rates for nonparametric regression, it remains an open question whether a localized Rademacher complexity-based tool can be developed for transductive learning. Our goal is to achieve sharp bounds for transductive learning that align with the inductive excess risk bounds established by LRC. We provide a definitive answer to this open problem with the introduction of TLC. We construct TLC by first establishing a novel and sharp concentration inequality for the supremum of a test-train empirical processes. Using a peeling strategy and a new surrogate variance operator, we derive the a novel excess risk bound in the transductive setting which is consistent with the classical LRC-based excess risk bound in the inductive setting. As an application of TLC, we employ this new tool to analyze the Transductive Kernel Learning (TKL) model, deriving sharper excess risk bounds than those provided by the current state-of-the-art under the same assumptions. Additionally, the concentration inequality for the test-train process is employed to derive a sharp concentration inequality for the general supremum of empirical processes involving random variables in the setting of uniform sampling without replacement. The sharpness of our derived bound is compared to existing concentration inequalities under the same conditions.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Introduces a new tool called Transductive Local Complexity (TLC) to analyze the generalization performance of transductive learning methods
- Extends the concept of Local Rademacher Complexity (LRC), a powerful tool for analyzing inductive models, to the transductive setting
- Aims to achieve sharp bounds for transductive learning that align with the inductive excess risk bounds established by LRC
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new tool called Transductive Local Complexity (TLC) that is designed to help researchers and developers better understand how well transductive learning models can generalize to new data. Transductive learning is a type of machine learning where the model is trained on a specific set of data and is then expected to perform well on that same set of data, rather than needing to generalize to new, unseen data.
The researchers extend a popular concept called Local Rademacher Complexity (LRC), which has been widely used to analyze the generalization abilities of inductive learning models (models that need to generalize to new data). By adapting LRC to the transductive setting, the researchers aim to provide similar insights and generalization bounds for transductive learning models.
The key idea is to develop a tool that can help researchers design new transductive learning algorithms with stronger theoretical guarantees about their performance on the target data, similar to how LRC has inspired the development of new inductive learning algorithms. The paper introduces TLC as a solution to this open problem in the transductive learning domain.
Technical Explanation
The paper first establishes a novel and sharp concentration inequality for the supremum of a test-train empirical process, which is a key step in deriving the TLC tool. Using a peeling strategy and a new surrogate variance operator, the researchers then derive a novel excess risk bound for the transductive setting that is consistent with the classical LRC-based excess risk bound in the inductive setting.
As an application of TLC, the paper analyzes the Transductive Kernel Learning (TKL) model, deriving sharper excess risk bounds than the current state-of-the-art under the same assumptions. Additionally, the concentration inequality for the test-train process is used to derive a sharp concentration inequality for the general supremum of empirical processes involving random variables in the setting of uniform sampling without replacement.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a significant contribution to the field of transductive learning by introducing TLC, a novel tool that extends the powerful LRC framework to the transductive setting. This is an important step towards bridging the gap between the theoretical understanding of inductive and transductive learning models.
One potential limitation of the work is that the practical application of TLC may require additional assumptions or simplifications to make it computationally tractable. The paper focuses on the theoretical analysis, and the implementation and empirical evaluation of TLC on real-world datasets is not explored in depth.
Additionally, while the paper demonstrates the use of TLC to analyze the TKL model, it would be interesting to see how TLC performs in comparison to other state-of-the-art transductive learning methods, such as those discussed in the survey on generalization bounds under graph dependence.
Further research could also investigate the potential limitations of statistical generalization and explore the broader implications of TLC for understanding the generalization capabilities of transductive learning algorithms.
Conclusion
The introduction of Transductive Local Complexity (TLC) is a significant contribution to the field of transductive learning. By extending the powerful LRC framework to the transductive setting, the researchers have provided a new tool that can help analyze the generalization performance of transductive learning models and inspire the development of new algorithms in this domain. The theoretical guarantees and insights provided by TLC have the potential to drive advancements in transductive learning and bridge the gap between the understanding of inductive and transductive learning methods.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
👨🏫
Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds for Transductive Learning and its Applications
Huayi Tang, Yong Liu
0
0
We develop generalization bounds for transductive learning algorithms in the context of information theory and PAC-Bayesian theory, covering both the random sampling setting and the random splitting setting. We show that the transductive generalization gap can be bounded by the mutual information between training labels selection and the hypothesis. By introducing the concept of transductive supersamples, we translate results depicted by various information measures from the inductive learning setting to the transductive learning setting. We further establish PAC-Bayesian bounds with weaker assumptions on the loss function and numbers of training and test data points. Finally, we present the upper bounds for adaptive optimization algorithms and demonstrate the applications of results on semi-supervised learning and graph learning scenarios. Our theoretic results are validated on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
6/11/2024
🤔
Transductive Sample Complexities Are Compact
Julian Asilis, Siddartha Devic, Shaddin Dughmi, Vatsal Sharan, Shang-Hua Teng
0
0
We demonstrate a compactness result holding broadly across supervised learning with a general class of loss functions: Any hypothesis class $H$ is learnable with transductive sample complexity $m$ precisely when all of its finite projections are learnable with sample complexity $m$. We prove that this exact form of compactness holds for realizable and agnostic learning with respect to any proper metric loss function (e.g., any norm on $mathbb{R}^d$) and any continuous loss on a compact space (e.g., cross-entropy, squared loss). For realizable learning with improper metric losses, we show that exact compactness of sample complexity can fail, and provide matching upper and lower bounds of a factor of 2 on the extent to which such sample complexities can differ. We conjecture that larger gaps are possible for the agnostic case. Furthermore, invoking the equivalence between sample complexities in the PAC and transductive models (up to lower order factors, in the realizable case) permits us to directly port our results to the PAC model, revealing an almost-exact form of compactness holding broadly in PAC learning.
6/5/2024
↗️
Is Transductive Learning Equivalent to PAC Learning?
Shaddin Dughmi, Yusuf Kalayci, Grayson York
0
0
Most work in the area of learning theory has focused on designing effective Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) learners. Recently, other models of learning such as transductive error have seen more scrutiny. We move toward showing that these problems are equivalent by reducing agnostic learning with a PAC guarantee to agnostic learning with a transductive guarantee by adding a small number of samples to the dataset. We first rederive the result of Aden-Ali et al. arXiv:2304.09167 reducing PAC learning to transductive learning in the realizable setting using simpler techniques and at more generality as background for our main positive result. Our agnostic transductive to PAC conversion technique extends the aforementioned argument to the agnostic case, showing that an agnostic transductive learner can be efficiently converted to an agnostic PAC learner. Finally, we characterize the performance of the agnostic one inclusion graph algorithm of Asilis et al. arXiv:2309.13692 for binary classification, and show that plugging it into our reduction leads to an agnostic PAC learner that is essentially optimal. Our results imply that transductive and PAC learning are essentially equivalent for supervised learning with pseudometric losses in the realizable setting, and for binary classification in the agnostic setting. We conjecture this is true more generally for the agnostic setting.
5/9/2024
🌿
Transductive Active Learning: Theory and Applications
Jonas Hubotter, Bhavya Sukhija, Lenart Treven, Yarden As, Andreas Krause
0
0
We generalize active learning to address real-world settings with concrete prediction targets where sampling is restricted to an accessible region of the domain, while prediction targets may lie outside this region. We analyze a family of decision rules that sample adaptively to minimize uncertainty about prediction targets. We are the first to show, under general regularity assumptions, that such decision rules converge uniformly to the smallest possible uncertainty obtainable from the accessible data. We demonstrate their strong sample efficiency in two key applications: Active few-shot fine-tuning of large neural networks and safe Bayesian optimization, where they improve significantly upon the state-of-the-art.
5/24/2024