Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds for Transductive Learning and its Applications
2311.04561
0
0
👨🏫
Abstract
We develop generalization bounds for transductive learning algorithms in the context of information theory and PAC-Bayesian theory, covering both the random sampling setting and the random splitting setting. We show that the transductive generalization gap can be bounded by the mutual information between training labels selection and the hypothesis. By introducing the concept of transductive supersamples, we translate results depicted by various information measures from the inductive learning setting to the transductive learning setting. We further establish PAC-Bayesian bounds with weaker assumptions on the loss function and numbers of training and test data points. Finally, we present the upper bounds for adaptive optimization algorithms and demonstrate the applications of results on semi-supervised learning and graph learning scenarios. Our theoretic results are validated on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper develops generalization bounds for transductive learning algorithms using information theory and PAC-Bayesian theory.
- It covers both the random sampling and random splitting settings, showing that the transductive generalization gap can be bounded by the mutual information between training labels and the hypothesis.
- The concept of transductive supersamples is introduced to translate results from the inductive to the transductive setting.
- PAC-Bayesian bounds are established with weaker assumptions on the loss function and data points.
- Upper bounds for adaptive optimization algorithms are presented, with applications demonstrated in semi-supervised and graph learning.
- The theoretical results are validated on synthetic and real-world datasets.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores ways to understand how well machine learning models can generalize beyond the data they were trained on. It focuses on a specific type of machine learning called "transductive learning," where the test data is known during training.
The researchers use information theory and a statistical framework called "PAC-Bayesian theory" to derive bounds on how much a transductive learning model's performance on the test data can differ from its training performance.
They show that this "transductive generalization gap" can be bounded by the amount of information the training labels share with the model's final hypothesis (its learned parameters). By introducing the idea of "transductive supersamples," they translate results from the more common "inductive learning" setting to the transductive setting.
The researchers also establish PAC-Bayesian bounds with weaker assumptions than previous work, meaning their results apply to a wider range of scenarios. They then demonstrate how these bounds can be used to analyze the performance of adaptive optimization algorithms, and apply the results to semi-supervised learning and graph learning problems.
The key contribution is providing a deeper theoretical understanding of how transductive learning models can generalize, with potential applications in areas like causal regression and transductive learning with local Rademacher complexity.
Technical Explanation
The paper develops generalization bounds for transductive learning algorithms, which are a type of machine learning where the test data is known during training.
The authors use tools from information theory and PAC-Bayesian theory to derive bounds on the "transductive generalization gap" - the difference between a model's performance on the training and test data. Specifically, they show that this gap can be upper bounded by the mutual information between the training label selection and the model's final hypothesis (learned parameters).
To bridge the gap between inductive and transductive learning, the researchers introduce the concept of "transductive supersamples." This allows them to translate results depicted by various information-theoretic measures from the inductive to the transductive setting.
The paper also establishes PAC-Bayesian bounds with weaker assumptions on the loss function and numbers of training and test data points compared to prior work. This extends the applicability of the theoretical results.
Furthermore, the authors present upper bounds for the performance of adaptive optimization algorithms, such as those used in deep learning. They demonstrate the usefulness of their findings in semi-supervised learning and graph learning scenarios, validating the theoretical results on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a significant theoretical contribution by developing a principled framework for understanding the generalization of transductive learning models. The use of information-theoretic measures and PAC-Bayesian analysis provides a solid mathematical foundation for the results.
One potential limitation is the reliance on several technical assumptions, such as the boundedness of the loss function and the existence of a prior distribution over hypotheses. While the authors show that these assumptions can be weakened compared to previous work, the practical implications of the results may still be limited to certain settings.
Additionally, the transductive learning scenario considered in the paper, where the test data is known during training, may not always align with real-world applications. It would be interesting to see how the insights from this work could be extended to more general inductive learning settings.
The paper's strong theoretical contributions are complemented by the practical demonstrations on synthetic and real-world datasets. However, a more comprehensive evaluation of the proposed methods in a wider range of applications could further validate the usefulness of the results.
Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in our understanding of generalization in machine learning, with potential implications for the development of more robust and reliable machine learning models.
Conclusion
This paper develops a strong theoretical framework for analyzing the generalization of transductive learning algorithms using information theory and PAC-Bayesian analysis. By bounding the transductive generalization gap in terms of the mutual information between training labels and the learned hypothesis, the researchers provide a principled way to understand the limitations and potential of these models.
The introduction of transductive supersamples and the establishment of PAC-Bayesian bounds with weaker assumptions extend the applicability of the results. The demonstrated applications in semi-supervised and graph learning highlight the practical relevance of this work, which could have broader implications for causal regression and other areas of machine learning.
Overall, this paper represents a significant contribution to the field, advancing our theoretical understanding of transductive learning and paving the way for the development of more robust and reliable machine learning models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📊
Information-theoretic generalization bounds for learning from quantum data
Matthias Caro, Tom Gur, Cambyse Rouz'e, Daniel Stilck Franc{c}a, Sathyawageeswar Subramanian
0
0
Learning tasks play an increasingly prominent role in quantum information and computation. They range from fundamental problems such as state discrimination and metrology over the framework of quantum probably approximately correct (PAC) learning, to the recently proposed shadow variants of state tomography. However, the many directions of quantum learning theory have so far evolved separately. We propose a general mathematical formalism for describing quantum learning by training on classical-quantum data and then testing how well the learned hypothesis generalizes to new data. In this framework, we prove bounds on the expected generalization error of a quantum learner in terms of classical and quantum information-theoretic quantities measuring how strongly the learner's hypothesis depends on the specific data seen during training. To achieve this, we use tools from quantum optimal transport and quantum concentration inequalities to establish non-commutative versions of decoupling lemmas that underlie recent information-theoretic generalization bounds for classical machine learning. Our framework encompasses and gives intuitively accessible generalization bounds for a variety of quantum learning scenarios such as quantum state discrimination, PAC learning quantum states, quantum parameter estimation, and quantumly PAC learning classical functions. Thereby, our work lays a foundation for a unifying quantum information-theoretic perspective on quantum learning.
6/21/2024
Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds for Deep Neural Networks
Haiyun He, Christina Lee Yu, Ziv Goldfeld
0
0
Deep neural networks (DNNs) exhibit an exceptional capacity for generalization in practical applications. This work aims to capture the effect and benefits of depth for supervised learning via information-theoretic generalization bounds. We first derive two hierarchical bounds on the generalization error in terms of the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence or the 1-Wasserstein distance between the train and test distributions of the network internal representations. The KL divergence bound shrinks as the layer index increases, while the Wasserstein bound implies the existence of a layer that serves as a generalization funnel, which attains a minimal 1-Wasserstein distance. Analytic expressions for both bounds are derived under the setting of binary Gaussian classification with linear DNNs. To quantify the contraction of the relevant information measures when moving deeper into the network, we analyze the strong data processing inequality (SDPI) coefficient between consecutive layers of three regularized DNN models: Dropout, DropConnect, and Gaussian noise injection. This enables refining our generalization bounds to capture the contraction as a function of the network architecture parameters. Specializing our results to DNNs with a finite parameter space and the Gibbs algorithm reveals that deeper yet narrower network architectures generalize better in those examples, although how broadly this statement applies remains a question.
4/5/2024
🔄
Uniform Generalization Bounds on Data-Dependent Hypothesis Sets via PAC-Bayesian Theory on Random Sets
Benjamin Dupuis, Paul Viallard, George Deligiannidis, Umut Simsekli
0
0
We propose data-dependent uniform generalization bounds by approaching the problem from a PAC-Bayesian perspective. We first apply the PAC-Bayesian framework on `random sets' in a rigorous way, where the training algorithm is assumed to output a data-dependent hypothesis set after observing the training data. This approach allows us to prove data-dependent bounds, which can be applicable in numerous contexts. To highlight the power of our approach, we consider two main applications. First, we propose a PAC-Bayesian formulation of the recently developed fractal-dimension-based generalization bounds. The derived results are shown to be tighter and they unify the existing results around one simple proof technique. Second, we prove uniform bounds over the trajectories of continuous Langevin dynamics and stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics. These results provide novel information about the generalization properties of noisy algorithms.
4/29/2024
Slicing Mutual Information Generalization Bounds for Neural Networks
Kimia Nadjahi, Kristjan Greenewald, Rickard Bruel Gabrielsson, Justin Solomon
0
0
The ability of machine learning (ML) algorithms to generalize well to unseen data has been studied through the lens of information theory, by bounding the generalization error with the input-output mutual information (MI), i.e., the MI between the training data and the learned hypothesis. Yet, these bounds have limited practicality for modern ML applications (e.g., deep learning), due to the difficulty of evaluating MI in high dimensions. Motivated by recent findings on the compressibility of neural networks, we consider algorithms that operate by slicing the parameter space, i.e., trained on random lower-dimensional subspaces. We introduce new, tighter information-theoretic generalization bounds tailored for such algorithms, demonstrating that slicing improves generalization. Our bounds offer significant computational and statistical advantages over standard MI bounds, as they rely on scalable alternative measures of dependence, i.e., disintegrated mutual information and $k$-sliced mutual information. Then, we extend our analysis to algorithms whose parameters do not need to exactly lie on random subspaces, by leveraging rate-distortion theory. This strategy yields generalization bounds that incorporate a distortion term measuring model compressibility under slicing, thereby tightening existing bounds without compromising performance or requiring model compression. Building on this, we propose a regularization scheme enabling practitioners to control generalization through compressibility. Finally, we empirically validate our results and achieve the computation of non-vacuous information-theoretic generalization bounds for neural networks, a task that was previously out of reach.
6/7/2024