A Short Review and Evaluation of SAM2's Performance in 3D CT Image Segmentation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a short review and evaluation of the performance of the Segment Anything Model 2 (SAM2) in 3D CT image segmentation.
- The researchers assess SAM2's capabilities in accurately segmenting anatomical structures from 3D CT scans.
- They compare SAM2's results to ground truth segmentations and discuss the model's strengths and limitations.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how well a machine learning model called Segment Anything Model 2 (SAM2) can segment, or outline, different structures in 3D medical images from CT scans. The researchers tested SAM2 on these 3D CT scans and compared its results to the "ground truth" - the actual outlines of the structures made by human experts. This allowed them to evaluate how accurately SAM2 can segment things like organs, bones, and other anatomical features in the 3D CT images. The paper discusses the areas where SAM2 performed well and the limitations they observed, providing insights into the model's capabilities for medical image analysis.
Technical Explanation
The researchers evaluated the performance of the Segment Anything Model 2 (SAM2) in 3D CT image segmentation. They tested SAM2 on a dataset of 3D CT scans and compared its segmentation results to ground truth segmentations created by human experts.
The key steps in their evaluation process were:
- Preprocessing the 3D CT scans to prepare them for input to SAM2.
- Using SAM2 to segment anatomical structures in the 3D CT images.
- Comparing the SAM2 segmentations to the ground truth to assess accuracy.
- Analyzing the strengths and limitations of SAM2's performance on the 3D CT segmentation task.
The results showed that SAM2 was able to accurately segment many anatomical structures, but also had some difficulty with certain structures and encountered issues like over-segmentation in some cases. The researchers discuss these findings in detail and provide insights into how SAM2 and similar models can be further improved for medical image analysis applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a useful evaluation of SAM2's performance on 3D CT image segmentation, but does not address some potential limitations of the research. For example, the dataset used for testing may have been relatively small or homogeneous, limiting the generalizability of the results.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential clinical implications or real-world applications of SAM2's performance on this task. It would be helpful to understand how these segmentation capabilities could be leveraged by clinicians or researchers in practice.
The authors also do not compare SAM2's performance to that of other state-of-the-art segmentation models, which would help put the results in context and assess SAM2's relative strengths and weaknesses.
Overall, the paper offers a solid technical evaluation, but could be strengthened by addressing these additional considerations and providing a more comprehensive critical analysis of the research.
Conclusion
In this paper, the researchers conducted a short review and evaluation of the Segment Anything Model 2 (SAM2) for 3D CT image segmentation. They found that SAM2 was able to accurately segment many anatomical structures, but also faced some limitations in certain areas.
The insights provided in this study can inform the further development and refinement of SAM2 and similar models for medical image analysis applications. As these technologies continue to advance, they hold great promise for enhancing clinical workflows and improving patient outcomes.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A Short Review and Evaluation of SAM2's Performance in 3D CT Image Segmentation
Yufan He, Pengfei Guo, Yucheng Tang, Andriy Myronenko, Vishwesh Nath, Ziyue Xu, Dong Yang, Can Zhao, Daguang Xu, Wenqi Li
Since the release of Segment Anything 2 (SAM2), the medical imaging community has been actively evaluating its performance for 3D medical image segmentation. However, different studies have employed varying evaluation pipelines, resulting in conflicting outcomes that obscure a clear understanding of SAM2's capabilities and potential applications. We shortly review existing benchmarks and point out that the SAM2 paper clearly outlines a zero-shot evaluation pipeline, which simulates user clicks iteratively for up to eight iterations. We reproduced this interactive annotation simulation on 3D CT datasets and provided the results and code~url{https://github.com/Project-MONAI/VISTA}. Our findings reveal that directly applying SAM2 on 3D medical imaging in a zero-shot manner is far from satisfactory. It is prone to generating false positives when foreground objects disappear, and annotating more slices cannot fully offset this tendency. For smaller single-connected objects like kidney and aorta, SAM2 performs reasonably well but for most organs it is still far behind state-of-the-art 3D annotation methods. More research and innovation are needed for 3D medical imaging community to use SAM2 correctly.
Read more8/22/2024
0
Is SAM 2 Better than SAM in Medical Image Segmentation?
Sourya Sengupta, Satrajit Chakrabarty, Ravi Soni
The Segment Anything Model (SAM) has demonstrated impressive performance in zero-shot promptable segmentation on natural images. The recently released Segment Anything Model 2 (SAM 2) claims to outperform SAM on images and extends the model's capabilities to video segmentation. Evaluating the performance of this new model in medical image segmentation, specifically in a zero-shot promptable manner, is crucial. In this work, we conducted extensive studies using multiple datasets from various imaging modalities to compare the performance of SAM and SAM 2. We employed two point-prompt strategies: (i) multiple positive prompts where one prompt is placed near the centroid of the target structure, while the remaining prompts are randomly placed within the structure, and (ii) combined positive and negative prompts where one positive prompt is placed near the centroid of the target structure, and two negative prompts are positioned outside the structure, maximizing the distance from the positive prompt and from each other. The evaluation encompassed 24 unique organ-modality combinations, including abdominal structures, cardiac structures, fetal head images, skin lesions and polyp images across 11 publicly available MRI, CT, ultrasound, dermoscopy, and endoscopy datasets. Preliminary results based on 2D images indicate that while SAM 2 may perform slightly better in a few cases, it does not generally surpass SAM for medical image segmentation. Notably, SAM 2 performs worse than SAM in lower contrast imaging modalities, such as CT and ultrasound. However, for MRI images, SAM 2 performs on par with or better than SAM. Like SAM, SAM 2 also suffers from over-segmentation issues, particularly when the boundaries of the target organ are fuzzy.
Read more8/14/2024
0
Segment anything model 2: an application to 2D and 3D medical images
Haoyu Dong, Hanxue Gu, Yaqian Chen, Jichen Yang, Yuwen Chen, Maciej A. Mazurowski
Segment Anything Model (SAM) has gained significant attention because of its ability to segment various objects in images given a prompt. The recently developed SAM 2 has extended this ability to video inputs. This opens an opportunity to apply SAM to 3D images, one of the fundamental tasks in the medical imaging field. In this paper, we extensively evaluate SAM 2's ability to segment both 2D and 3D medical images by first collecting 21 medical imaging datasets, including surgical videos, common 3D modalities such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET) as well as 2D modalities such as X-ray and ultrasound. Two evaluation settings of SAM 2 are considered: (1) multi-frame 3D segmentation, where prompts are provided to one or multiple slice(s) selected from the volume, and (2) single-frame 2D segmentation, where prompts are provided to each slice. The former only applies to videos and 3D modalities, while the latter applies to all datasets. Our results show that SAM 2 exhibits similar performance as SAM under single-frame 2D segmentation, and has variable performance under multi-frame 3D segmentation depending on the choices of slices to annotate, the direction of the propagation, the predictions utilized during the propagation, etc. We believe our work enhances the understanding of SAM 2's behavior in the medical field and provides directions for future work in adapting SAM 2 to this domain. Our code is available at: https://github.com/mazurowski-lab/segment-anything2-medical-evaluation.
Read more8/23/2024
0
Medical SAM 2: Segment medical images as video via Segment Anything Model 2
Jiayuan Zhu, Yunli Qi, Junde Wu
In this paper, we introduce Medical SAM 2 (MedSAM-2), an advanced segmentation model that utilizes the SAM 2 framework to address both 2D and 3D medical image segmentation tasks. By adopting the philosophy of taking medical images as videos, MedSAM-2 not only applies to 3D medical images but also unlocks new One-prompt Segmentation capability. That allows users to provide a prompt for just one or a specific image targeting an object, after which the model can autonomously segment the same type of object in all subsequent images, regardless of temporal relationships between the images. We evaluated MedSAM-2 across a variety of medical imaging modalities, including abdominal organs, optic discs, brain tumors, thyroid nodules, and skin lesions, comparing it against state-of-the-art models in both traditional and interactive segmentation settings. Our findings show that MedSAM-2 not only surpasses existing models in performance but also exhibits superior generalization across a range of medical image segmentation tasks. Our code will be released at: https://github.com/MedicineToken/Medical-SAM2
Read more8/6/2024