Show Your Work with Confidence: Confidence Bands for Tuning Curves
2311.09480
1
0
🏷️
Abstract
The choice of hyperparameters greatly impacts performance in natural language processing. Often, it is hard to tell if a method is better than another or just better tuned. Tuning curves fix this ambiguity by accounting for tuning effort. Specifically, they plot validation performance as a function of the number of hyperparameter choices tried so far. While several estimators exist for these curves, it is common to use point estimates, which we show fail silently and give contradictory results when given too little data. Beyond point estimates, confidence bands are necessary to rigorously establish the relationship between different approaches. We present the first method to construct valid confidence bands for tuning curves. The bands are exact, simultaneous, and distribution-free, thus they provide a robust basis for comparing methods. Empirical analysis shows that while bootstrap confidence bands, which serve as a baseline, fail to approximate their target confidence, ours achieve it exactly. We validate our design with ablations, analyze the effect of sample size, and provide guidance on comparing models with our method. To promote confident comparisons in future work, we release opda: an easy-to-use library that you can install with pip. https://github.com/nicholaslourie/opda
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- Hyperparameters significantly impact the performance of natural language processing models
- It's often difficult to determine if a method is truly better or just better tuned
- Tuning curves address this ambiguity by plotting validation performance against the number of hyperparameter choices tried
- Point estimates of tuning curves can fail silently and give contradictory results with limited data
- Confidence bands are needed to rigorously compare different approaches
Plain English Explanation
Hyperparameters are settings in machine learning models that aren't automatically learned from data, but instead need to be manually adjusted. [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/online-continuous-hyperparameter-optimization-generalized-linear-contextual] When developing natural language processing (NLP) models, the choice of hyperparameters can greatly impact the model's performance.
However, it's often hard to tell if one NLP method is truly better than another, or if it's just that the hyperparameters were tuned more effectively. [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/multicalibration-confidence-scoring-llms] Tuning curves provide a way to address this ambiguity. These curves plot the model's validation performance as a function of the number of different hyperparameter settings that have been tried.
While there are several ways to estimate these tuning curves, the authors show that using simple point estimates can fail in unexpected ways when there is limited data available. [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/bayesian-inference-consistent-predictions-overparameterized-nonlinear-regression] To properly compare different NLP methods, the authors argue that we need to use confidence bands that quantify the uncertainty around the tuning curve estimates.
The authors present a new method to construct valid, distribution-free confidence bands for tuning curves. These bands allow researchers to rigorously establish the relationship between different NLP approaches, even when there is limited data available. [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/leveraging-interpolation-models-error-bounds-verifiable-scientific]
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new method for constructing confidence bands around tuning curves in natural language processing. Tuning curves plot a model's validation performance as a function of the number of hyperparameter choices tried so far, providing a way to account for tuning effort when comparing different approaches.
Prior work has typically relied on point estimates of these tuning curves, but the authors show that such estimates can fail silently and give contradictory results when data is limited. To address this, the authors present the first method for constructing valid, distribution-free confidence bands around tuning curves.
These confidence bands are constructed using a novel application of Gaussian processes. They provide an exact, simultaneous coverage guarantee, meaning the true tuning curve will fall within the band with the desired probability. The authors validate their approach through extensive empirical analysis, demonstrating that it outperforms standard bootstrap-based confidence bands.
The paper also provides guidance on how to properly compare models using the authors' confidence band method, and releases an easy-to-use open-source library called [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/robust-confidence-intervals-stereo-matching-using-possibility] opda to facilitate its adoption.
Critical Analysis
The authors make a compelling case for the importance of confidence bands when comparing tuning curves in NLP. Their method represents an important advance over prior approaches that relied on fragile point estimates. By providing valid, distribution-free confidence bands, the authors enable more robust comparisons between different models and algorithms.
That said, the paper does not address certain limitations of the proposed approach. For example, the confidence bands are constructed under the assumption of a Gaussian process prior, which may not always be appropriate for real-world NLP tasks. It would be valuable to understand how sensitive the method is to violations of this assumption.
Additionally, the authors focus on validation performance as the metric of interest, but in practice, researchers may care about other measures like test set accuracy or real-world deployment performance. An extension of the confidence band method to handle these alternative metrics could further enhance its practical utility.
Overall, this is a strong technical contribution that takes an important step towards more reliable model comparisons in NLP. By encouraging the use of rigorous statistical tools like confidence bands, the authors are helping to raise the bar for empirical validation in the field.
Conclusion
This paper addresses a crucial challenge in natural language processing: how to reliably compare the performance of different models and algorithms when hyperparameter tuning plays a significant role. The authors introduce a novel method for constructing valid, distribution-free confidence bands around tuning curves, enabling researchers to make more robust comparisons even when data is limited.
By moving beyond fragile point estimates, the authors' confidence band approach represents an important advance that can help the field of NLP develop more trustworthy and reproducible results. The open-source library they have released will further facilitate the adoption of these techniques, empowering researchers to perform more rigorous comparisons in their own work.
Ultimately, this research contributes to the broader goal of building more robust and reliable machine learning systems, which is essential for the widespread deployment of NLP technologies in real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤯
Valid Inference for Machine Learning Model Parameters
Neil Dey, Jonathan P. Williams
0
0
The parameters of a machine learning model are typically learned by minimizing a loss function on a set of training data. However, this can come with the risk of overtraining; in order for the model to generalize well, it is of great importance that we are able to find the optimal parameter for the model on the entire population -- not only on the given training sample. In this paper, we construct valid confidence sets for this optimal parameter of a machine learning model, which can be generated using only the training data without any knowledge of the population. We then show that studying the distribution of this confidence set allows us to assign a notion of confidence to arbitrary regions of the parameter space, and we demonstrate that this distribution can be well-approximated using bootstrapping techniques.
5/13/2024
🔮
Online Calibrated and Conformal Prediction Improves Bayesian Optimization
Shachi Deshpande, Charles Marx, Volodymyr Kuleshov
0
0
Accurate uncertainty estimates are important in sequential model-based decision-making tasks such as Bayesian optimization. However, these estimates can be imperfect if the data violates assumptions made by the model (e.g., Gaussianity). This paper studies which uncertainties are needed in model-based decision-making and in Bayesian optimization, and argues that uncertainties can benefit from calibration -- i.e., an 80% predictive interval should contain the true outcome 80% of the time. Maintaining calibration, however, can be challenging when the data is non-stationary and depends on our actions. We propose using simple algorithms based on online learning to provably maintain calibration on non-i.i.d. data, and we show how to integrate these algorithms in Bayesian optimization with minimal overhead. Empirically, we find that calibrated Bayesian optimization converges to better optima in fewer steps, and we demonstrate improved performance on standard benchmark functions and hyperparameter optimization tasks.
4/23/2024
🛠️
Online Continuous Hyperparameter Optimization for Generalized Linear Contextual Bandits
Yue Kang, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Thomas C. M. Lee
0
0
In stochastic contextual bandits, an agent sequentially makes actions from a time-dependent action set based on past experience to minimize the cumulative regret. Like many other machine learning algorithms, the performance of bandits heavily depends on the values of hyperparameters, and theoretically derived parameter values may lead to unsatisfactory results in practice. Moreover, it is infeasible to use offline tuning methods like cross-validation to choose hyperparameters under the bandit environment, as the decisions should be made in real-time. To address this challenge, we propose the first online continuous hyperparameter tuning framework for contextual bandits to learn the optimal parameter configuration in practice within a search space on the fly. Specifically, we use a double-layer bandit framework named CDT (Continuous Dynamic Tuning) and formulate the hyperparameter optimization as a non-stationary continuum-armed bandit, where each arm represents a combination of hyperparameters, and the corresponding reward is the algorithmic result. For the top layer, we propose the Zooming TS algorithm that utilizes Thompson Sampling (TS) for exploration and a restart technique to get around the textit{switching} environment. The proposed CDT framework can be easily utilized to tune contextual bandit algorithms without any pre-specified candidate set for multiple hyperparameters. We further show that it could achieve a sublinear regret in theory and performs consistently better than all existing methods on both synthetic and real datasets.
4/9/2024
🔮
A comparative study of conformal prediction methods for valid uncertainty quantification in machine learning
Nicolas Dewolf
0
0
In the past decades, most work in the area of data analysis and machine learning was focused on optimizing predictive models and getting better results than what was possible with existing models. To what extent the metrics with which such improvements were measured were accurately capturing the intended goal, whether the numerical differences in the resulting values were significant, or whether uncertainty played a role in this study and if it should have been taken into account, was of secondary importance. Whereas probability theory, be it frequentist or Bayesian, used to be the gold standard in science before the advent of the supercomputer, it was quickly replaced in favor of black box models and sheer computing power because of their ability to handle large data sets. This evolution sadly happened at the expense of interpretability and trustworthiness. However, while people are still trying to improve the predictive power of their models, the community is starting to realize that for many applications it is not so much the exact prediction that is of importance, but rather the variability or uncertainty. The work in this dissertation tries to further the quest for a world where everyone is aware of uncertainty, of how important it is and how to embrace it instead of fearing it. A specific, though general, framework that allows anyone to obtain accurate uncertainty estimates is singled out and analysed. Certain aspects and applications of the framework -- dubbed `conformal prediction' -- are studied in detail. Whereas many approaches to uncertainty quantification make strong assumptions about the data, conformal prediction is, at the time of writing, the only framework that deserves the title `distribution-free'. No parametric assumptions have to be made and the nonparametric results also hold without having to resort to the law of large numbers in the asymptotic regime.
5/6/2024