Smoothed Robust Phase Retrieval

Read original: arXiv:2409.01570 - Published 9/4/2024 by Zhong Zheng, Lingzhou Xue
Total Score

0

Smoothed Robust Phase Retrieval

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Presents a new framework for robust phase retrieval, a crucial problem in various fields like signal processing and optics
  • Introduces a smoothing technique to improve the robustness of phase retrieval algorithms against noise and outliers
  • Provides theoretical guarantees and empirical results demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed approach

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a new framework for robust phase retrieval, which is an important problem in areas like signal processing and optics. Phase retrieval refers to the task of reconstructing a signal or image from measurements of its magnitude (or intensity) alone, without access to the phase information.

The proposed approach uses a smoothing technique to improve the robustness of phase retrieval algorithms against noise and outliers in the measurements. By introducing a controlled amount of randomness into the optimization process, the framework can better handle imperfections in the data and produce more reliable reconstructions.

The authors provide theoretical guarantees on the performance of their smoothed robust phase retrieval method, demonstrating its ability to achieve accurate reconstructions even in the presence of significant noise or corrupted measurements. They also present empirical results on both synthetic and real-world datasets, showing the practical effectiveness of the proposed technique.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a general framework for smoothed robust phase retrieval, which aims to address the limitations of traditional phase retrieval algorithms in the face of noisy or corrupted measurements.

At the core of the approach is a smoothing strategy that introduces a controlled amount of randomness into the optimization process. Specifically, the authors propose to replace the original phase retrieval objective function with a smoothed version, obtained by averaging the original function over a small neighborhood around the current iterate.

This smoothing has several key benefits:

  1. Robustness to noise and outliers: The averaging process helps to dampen the impact of noisy or corrupted measurements, making the optimization more resilient to imperfections in the data.

  2. Improved convergence properties: The smoothed objective function can have better landscape properties, such as increased convexity, which can lead to faster and more reliable convergence of the optimization algorithm.

  3. Flexibility and generality: The smoothing technique can be combined with a variety of existing phase retrieval algorithms, allowing for a modular and customizable approach to solving the problem.

The authors provide a theoretical analysis of the proposed framework, establishing upper bounds on the reconstruction error and convergence rates under suitable assumptions. They also demonstrate the empirical performance of the smoothed robust phase retrieval method on both synthetic and real-world datasets, showcasing its advantages over state-of-the-art alternatives.

Critical Analysis

While the paper presents a compelling framework for robust phase retrieval, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

  1. Computational complexity: The smoothing technique introduced in the paper may add some computational overhead compared to standard phase retrieval algorithms, which could be a concern for real-time or large-scale applications.

  2. Sensitivity to hyperparameters: The effectiveness of the smoothed approach may depend on the careful tuning of hyperparameters, such as the smoothing radius or the number of random samples used in the averaging process. Developing more adaptive or self-tuning strategies could be an area for future work.

  3. Generalization to other domains: The paper focuses on the phase retrieval problem, but the smoothing technique could potentially be extended to other inverse problems or optimization tasks where robustness to noise and outliers is important. Exploring these broader applications could further demonstrate the versatility of the proposed framework.

  4. Practical considerations: While the theoretical and empirical results in the paper are promising, real-world deployments of the smoothed robust phase retrieval method may face additional challenges, such as calibration of measurement devices, handling of complex noise distributions, or integration with existing pipelines. Addressing these practical concerns could be an important next step.

Overall, the paper presents a compelling and well-executed framework for improving the robustness of phase retrieval algorithms, with clear potential for impact in various fields. The critical analysis highlights areas for further research and development to fully realize the benefits of this approach.

Conclusion

The "Smoothed Robust Phase Retrieval" paper introduces a novel framework that enhances the robustness of phase retrieval algorithms against noise and outliers. By incorporating a smoothing technique into the optimization process, the proposed method can produce more reliable reconstructions even in the presence of imperfect measurements.

The theoretical guarantees and empirical results presented in the paper demonstrate the effectiveness of the smoothed robust phase retrieval approach, making it a promising solution for applications in signal processing, optics, and related fields. While the framework may have some computational and practical considerations, the paper lays the groundwork for future research and development in this important area of inverse problems.

Overall, the "Smoothed Robust Phase Retrieval" paper represents a significant contribution to the field of phase retrieval, offering a new perspective on improving the robustness and reliability of signal and image reconstruction tasks.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Smoothed Robust Phase Retrieval
Total Score

0

Smoothed Robust Phase Retrieval

Zhong Zheng, Lingzhou Xue

The phase retrieval problem in the presence of noise aims to recover the signal vector of interest from a set of quadratic measurements with infrequent but arbitrary corruptions, and it plays an important role in many scientific applications. However, the essential geometric structure of the nonconvex robust phase retrieval based on the $ell_1$-loss is largely unknown to study spurious local solutions, even under the ideal noiseless setting, and its intrinsic nonsmooth nature also impacts the efficiency of optimization algorithms. This paper introduces the smoothed robust phase retrieval (SRPR) based on a family of convolution-type smoothed loss functions. Theoretically, we prove that the SRPR enjoys a benign geometric structure with high probability: (1) under the noiseless situation, the SRPR has no spurious local solutions, and the target signals are global solutions, and (2) under the infrequent but arbitrary corruptions, we characterize the stationary points of the SRPR and prove its benign landscape, which is the first landscape analysis of phase retrieval with corruption in the literature. Moreover, we prove the local linear convergence rate of gradient descent for solving the SRPR under the noiseless situation. Experiments on both simulated datasets and image recovery are provided to demonstrate the numerical performance of the SRPR.

Read more

9/4/2024

Low Complexity Regularized Phase Retrieval
Total Score

0

Low Complexity Regularized Phase Retrieval

Jean-Jacques Godeme, Jalal Fadili

In this paper, we study the phase retrieval problem in the situation where the vector to be recovered has an a priori structure that can encoded into a regularization term. This regularizer is intended to promote solutions conforming to some notion of simplicity or low complexity. We investigate both noiseless recovery and stability to noise and provide a very general and unified analysis framework that goes far beyond the sparse phase retrieval mostly considered in the literature. In the noiseless case we provide sufficient conditions under which exact recovery, up to global sign change, is possible. For Gaussian measurement maps, we also provide a sample complexity bound for exact recovery. This bound depends on the Gaussian width of the descent cone at the soughtafter vector which is a geometric measure of the complexity of the latter. In the noisy case, we consider both the constrained (Mozorov) and penalized (Tikhonov) formulations. We provide sufficient conditions for stable recovery and prove linear convergence for sufficiently small noise. For Gaussian measurements, we again give a sample complexity bound for linear convergence to hold with high probability. This bound scales linearly in the intrinsic dimension of the sought-after vector but only logarithmically in the ambient dimension.

Read more

7/24/2024

Stable Phase Retrieval with Mirror Descent
Total Score

0

Stable Phase Retrieval with Mirror Descent

Jean-Jacques Godeme, Jalal Fadili, Claude Amra, Myriam Zerrad

In this paper, we aim to reconstruct an n-dimensional real vector from m phaseless measurements corrupted by an additive noise. We extend the noiseless framework developed in [15], based on mirror descent (or Bregman gradient descent), to deal with noisy measurements and prove that the procedure is stable to (small enough) additive noise. In the deterministic case, we show that mirror descent converges to a critical point of the phase retrieval problem, and if the algorithm is well initialized and the noise is small enough, the critical point is near the true vector up to a global sign change. When the measurements are i.i.d Gaussian and the signal-to-noise ratio is large enough, we provide global convergence guarantees that ensure that with high probability, mirror descent converges to a global minimizer near the true vector (up to a global sign change), as soon as the number of measurements m is large enough. The sample complexity bound can be improved if a spectral method is used to provide a good initial guess. We complement our theoretical study with several numerical results showing that mirror descent is both a computationally and statistically efficient scheme to solve the phase retrieval problem.

Read more

6/21/2024

A Sample Efficient Alternating Minimization-based Algorithm For Robust Phase Retrieval
Total Score

0

A Sample Efficient Alternating Minimization-based Algorithm For Robust Phase Retrieval

Adarsh Barik, Anand Krishna, Vincent Y. F. Tan

In this work, we study the robust phase retrieval problem where the task is to recover an unknown signal $theta^* in mathbb{R}^d$ in the presence of potentially arbitrarily corrupted magnitude-only linear measurements. We propose an alternating minimization approach that incorporates an oracle solver for a non-convex optimization problem as a subroutine. Our algorithm guarantees convergence to $theta^*$ and provides an explicit polynomial dependence of the convergence rate on the fraction of corrupted measurements. We then provide an efficient construction of the aforementioned oracle under a sparse arbitrary outliers model and offer valuable insights into the geometric properties of the loss landscape in phase retrieval with corrupted measurements. Our proposed oracle avoids the need for computationally intensive spectral initialization, using a simple gradient descent algorithm with a constant step size and random initialization instead. Additionally, our overall algorithm achieves nearly linear sample complexity, $mathcal{O}(d , mathrm{polylog}(d))$.

Read more

9/10/2024