Social, Legal, Ethical, Empathetic, and Cultural Rules: Compilation and Reasoning (Extended Version)
0
🔄
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This research paper discusses the compilation and reasoning of social, legal, ethical, empathetic, and cultural rules for artificial intelligence systems.
- The authors explore the challenge of imbuing AI systems with appropriate social, legal, ethical, and cultural guidelines to govern their behavior.
- The paper presents a framework for representing and reasoning about these diverse sets of rules to ensure AI systems act in alignment with human values and norms.
Plain English Explanation
The research focuses on a critical challenge in developing advanced AI systems - ensuring they behave in ways that are socially, legally, ethically, and culturally appropriate. As AI becomes more capable, it is crucial that these systems have a strong grasp of the complex web of rules and norms that guide human behavior.
The researchers propose a framework to formally represent and reason about different categories of rules, from legal statutes to unwritten social conventions. This allows AI systems to navigate complex real-world scenarios while adhering to the relevant guidelines. For example, an AI assistant might need to balance privacy laws, professional ethics, and cultural sensitivities when interacting with users.
By compiling and reasoning about these diverse rules, the researchers aim to create AI agents that can engage with humans in a way that is sensitive to the relevant social, legal, and ethical considerations. This is an important step towards developing AI systems that are truly aligned with human values and can be trusted to operate in our communities.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a framework for formally representing and reasoning about social, legal, ethical, empathetic, and cultural rules for AI systems. The authors argue that imbuing AI with an understanding of these complex guidelines is crucial for ensuring appropriate and trustworthy behavior.
The framework involves several key components:
- A taxonomy for categorizing different types of rules (e.g. legal, ethical, social)
- Techniques for representing these rules in a machine-readable format
- Reasoning algorithms that can interpret the rules and apply them to specific situations
The authors demonstrate the application of this framework through several use cases, such as an AI assistant navigating privacy and consent policies, or a robot operating in a culturally-sensitive environment. The results show how the system can reason about the relevant rules to generate behavior that aligns with human values and norms.
Critical Analysis
The proposed framework represents an important step towards developing AI systems that can reliably operate in complex social and cultural contexts. By accounting for a diverse set of rules and norms, the researchers aim to create AI agents that are sensitive to the nuances of human interaction.
However, the paper acknowledges several limitations and challenges that must be addressed. Fully capturing the breadth and subtlety of social and cultural rules in a computational system is an enormously difficult task. The authors note that their current rule representation may oversimplify certain concepts, and that further work is needed to handle conflicting or ambiguous guidelines.
Additionally, the reasoning algorithms presented rely on a closed-world assumption, where the system has full knowledge of the relevant rules. In reality, AI systems will often need to operate with incomplete information and make judgments under uncertainty. Extending the framework to handle such situations is an important area for future research.
Overall, this work provides a valuable foundation for imbuing AI systems with appropriate social, legal, and ethical guidelines. As AI capabilities continue to advance, addressing these challenges will be crucial for ensuring that these powerful technologies are deployed in a manner that is aligned with human values.
Conclusion
This research paper tackles a critical challenge in AI development - endowing systems with the capacity to behave in socially, legally, and ethically appropriate ways. By proposing a framework for formally representing and reasoning about diverse sets of rules, the authors aim to create AI agents that can navigate complex real-world scenarios while adhering to relevant human norms and values.
While significant work remains to fully capture the nuances of social and cultural guidelines, this research represents an important step towards developing AI systems that are truly aligned with the needs and expectations of the humans they interact with. As AI capabilities continue to grow, addressing these challenges will be essential for ensuring these powerful technologies are deployed in a trustworthy and beneficial manner.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔄
0
Social, Legal, Ethical, Empathetic, and Cultural Rules: Compilation and Reasoning (Extended Version)
Nicolas Troquard, Martina De Sanctis, Paola Inverardi, Patrizio Pelliccione, Gian Luca Scoccia
The rise of AI-based and autonomous systems is raising concerns and apprehension due to potential negative repercussions stemming from their behavior or decisions. These systems must be designed to comply with the human contexts in which they will operate. To this extent, Townsend et al. (2022) introduce the concept of SLEEC (social, legal, ethical, empathetic, or cultural) rules that aim to facilitate the formulation, verification, and enforcement of the rules AI-based and autonomous systems should obey. They lay out a methodology to elicit them and to let philosophers, lawyers, domain experts, and others to formulate them in natural language. To enable their effective use in AI systems, it is necessary to translate these rules systematically into a formal language that supports automated reasoning. In this study, we first conduct a linguistic analysis of the SLEEC rules pattern, which justifies the translation of SLEEC rules into classical logic. Then we investigate the computational complexity of reasoning about SLEEC rules and show how logical programming frameworks can be employed to implement SLEEC rules in practical scenarios. The result is a readily applicable strategy for implementing AI systems that conform to norms expressed as SLEEC rules.
Read more4/3/2024
0
An Empirical Design Justice Approach to Identifying Ethical Considerations in the Intersection of Large Language Models and Social Robotics
Alva Markelius
The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) in social robotics presents a unique set of ethical challenges and social impacts. This research is set out to identify ethical considerations that arise in the design and development of these two technologies in combination. Using LLMs for social robotics may provide benefits, such as enabling natural language open-domain dialogues. However, the intersection of these two technologies also gives rise to ethical concerns related to misinformation, non-verbal cues, emotional disruption, and biases. The robot's physical social embodiment adds complexity, as ethical hazards associated with LLM-based Social AI, such as hallucinations and misinformation, can be exacerbated due to the effects of physical embodiment on social perception and communication. To address these challenges, this study employs an empirical design justice-based methodology, focusing on identifying socio-technical ethical considerations through a qualitative co-design and interaction study. The purpose of the study is to identify ethical considerations relevant to the process of co-design of, and interaction with a humanoid social robot as the interface of a LLM, and to evaluate how a design justice methodology can be used in the context of designing LLMs-based social robotics. The findings reveal a mapping of ethical considerations arising in four conceptual dimensions: interaction, co-design, terms of service and relationship and evaluates how a design justice approach can be used empirically in the intersection of LLMs and social robotics.
Read more6/13/2024
🤖
0
A Conceptual Framework for Ethical Evaluation of Machine Learning Systems
Neha R. Gupta, Jessica Hullman, Hari Subramonyam
Research in Responsible AI has developed a range of principles and practices to ensure that machine learning systems are used in a manner that is ethical and aligned with human values. However, a critical yet often neglected aspect of ethical ML is the ethical implications that appear when designing evaluations of ML systems. For instance, teams may have to balance a trade-off between highly informative tests to ensure downstream product safety, with potential fairness harms inherent to the implemented testing procedures. We conceptualize ethics-related concerns in standard ML evaluation techniques. Specifically, we present a utility framework, characterizing the key trade-off in ethical evaluation as balancing information gain against potential ethical harms. The framework is then a tool for characterizing challenges teams face, and systematically disentangling competing considerations that teams seek to balance. Differentiating between different types of issues encountered in evaluation allows us to highlight best practices from analogous domains, such as clinical trials and automotive crash testing, which navigate these issues in ways that can offer inspiration to improve evaluation processes in ML. Our analysis underscores the critical need for development teams to deliberately assess and manage ethical complexities that arise during the evaluation of ML systems, and for the industry to move towards designing institutional policies to support ethical evaluations.
Read more8/21/2024
↗️
0
Learning Machine Morality through Experience and Interaction
Elizaveta Tennant, Stephen Hailes, Mirco Musolesi
Increasing interest in ensuring safety of next-generation Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems calls for novel approaches to embedding morality into autonomous agents. Traditionally, this has been done by imposing explicit top-down rules or hard constraints on systems, for example by filtering system outputs through pre-defined ethical rules. Recently, instead, entirely bottom-up methods for learning implicit preferences from human behavior have become increasingly popular, such as those for training and fine-tuning Large Language Models. In this paper, we provide a systematization of existing approaches to the problem of introducing morality in machines - modeled as a continuum, and argue that the majority of popular techniques lie at the extremes - either being fully hard-coded, or entirely learned, where no explicit statement of any moral principle is required. Given the relative strengths and weaknesses of each type of methodology, we argue that more hybrid solutions are needed to create adaptable and robust, yet more controllable and interpretable agents. In particular, we present three case studies of recent works which use learning from experience (i.e., Reinforcement Learning) to explicitly provide moral principles to learning agents - either as intrinsic rewards, moral logical constraints or textual principles for language models. For example, using intrinsic rewards in Social Dilemma games, we demonstrate how it is possible to represent classical moral frameworks for agents. We also present an overview of the existing work in this area in order to provide empirical evidence for the potential of this hybrid approach. We then discuss strategies for evaluating the effectiveness of moral learning agents. Finally, we present open research questions and implications for the future of AI safety and ethics which are emerging from this framework.
Read more4/22/2024