Social Mediation through Robots -- A Scoping Review on Improving Group Interactions through Directed Robot Action using an Extended Group Process Model
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides a scoping review on how robots can be used to improve group interactions and dynamics.
- It proposes an extended group process model to understand how robots can mediate social interactions in groups.
- The review examines existing research on using robots to facilitate, moderate, or influence group processes and dynamics.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores how robots can be used to improve the way people interact and work together in groups. It suggests a framework or model to understand how robots can act as social mediators - that is, how they can help facilitate and influence group dynamics and processes.
The review looks at research on using social robots to do things like encourage participation, moderate discussions, and shape the overall group dynamic in productive ways. The key idea is that robots can be designed and programmed to intervene in group interactions in targeted ways to improve collaboration, decision-making, and other group outcomes.
This work is part of a broader effort to understand how humans and machines can work together in social systems and how robotic technologies can be leveraged to enhance human-to-human interactions and group processes.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a scoping review of research on using robots to mediate and improve social interactions in group settings. It proposes an extended group process model that explains how robots can intervene in and influence various stages of group dynamics, such as:
- Formation: Robots can help structure the initial group formation and organization.
- Interaction: Robots can moderate interactions, encourage participation, and regulate the flow of conversation.
- Outcome: Robots can shape the overall outcomes and outputs of the group's work.
The review synthesizes insights from existing studies on how robots have been designed and deployed to play these mediating roles in different group contexts, such as meetings, collaborative tasks, and social gatherings. Key design considerations and the various ways robots can impact group processes are discussed.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of research on using robots for social mediation in groups. However, it acknowledges several limitations and caveats:
- Much of the existing research has been conducted in controlled lab settings, so the findings may not fully translate to real-world group dynamics.
- The long-term effects of sustained robot involvement in groups are not well understood.
- There are open questions around the appropriate level and types of robot interventions that are most effective for different group tasks and contexts.
Additionally, the review does not delve into potential ethical concerns or social implications of integrating robots into delicate human group interactions. Further research is needed to understand the risks and unintended consequences of this technology.
Conclusion
This scoping review offers a valuable framework for understanding how social robots can be leveraged to mediate and improve group interactions and dynamics. By systematically examining the existing research, the paper highlights promising directions for further developing and deploying robots as tools to enhance human-to-human collaboration and group problem-solving. However, careful consideration of the potential risks and ethical implications will be crucial as this technology continues to advance.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Social Mediation through Robots -- A Scoping Review on Improving Group Interactions through Directed Robot Action using an Extended Group Process Model
Thomas H. Weisswange, Hifza Javed, Manuel Dietrich, Malte F. Jung, Nawid Jamali
Group processes refer to the dynamics that occur within a group and are critical for understanding how groups function. With robots being increasingly placed within small groups, improving these processes has emerged as an important application of social robotics. Social Mediation Robots elicit behavioral change within groups by deliberately influencing the processes of groups. While research in this field has demonstrated that robots can effectively affect interpersonal dynamics, there is a notable gap in integrating these insights to develop coherent understanding and theory. We present a scoping review of literature targeting changes in social interactions between multiple humans through intentional action from robotic agents. To guide our review, we adapt the classical Input-Process-Output (I-P-O) models that we call Mediation I-P-O model. We evaluated 1633 publications, which yielded 89 distinct social mediation concepts. We construct 11 mediation approaches robots can use to shape processes in small groups and teams. This work strives to produce generalizable insights and evaluate the extent to which the potential of social mediation through robots has been realized thus far. We hope that the proposed framework encourages a holistic approach to the study of social mediation and provides a foundation to standardize future reporting in the domain.
Read more9/11/2024
0
Moderating Group Conversation Dynamics with Social Robots
Lucrezia Grassi, Carmine Tommaso Recchiuto, Antonio Sgorbissa
This research investigates the impact of social robot participation in group conversations and assesses the effectiveness of various addressing policies. The study involved 300 participants, divided into groups of four, interacting with a humanoid robot serving as the moderator. The robot utilized conversation data to determine the most appropriate speaker to address. The findings indicate that the robot's addressing policy significantly influenced conversation dynamics, resulting in more balanced attention to each participant and a reduction in subgroup formation.
Read more8/2/2024
0
Egocentric Robots in a Human-Centric World? Exploring Group-Robot-Interaction in Public Spaces
Ana Muller, Anja Richert
The deployment of social robots in real-world scenarios is increasing, supporting humans in various contexts. However, they still struggle to grasp social dynamics, especially in public spaces, sometimes resulting in violations of social norms, such as interrupting human conversations. This behavior, originating from a limited processing of social norms, might be perceived as robot-centered. Understanding social dynamics, particularly in group-robot-interactions (GRI), underscores the need for further research and development in human-robot-interaction (HRI). Enhancing the interaction abilities of social robots, especially in GRIs, can improve their effectiveness in real-world applications on a micro-level, as group interactions lead to increased motivation and comfort. In this study, we assessed the influence of the interaction condition (dyadic vs. triadic) on the perceived extraversion (ext.) of social robots in public spaces. The research involved 40 HRIs, including 24 dyadic (i.e., one human and one robot) interactions and 16 triadic interactions, which involve at least three entities, including the robot.
Read more7/26/2024
0
Human-machine social systems
Milena Tsvetkova, Taha Yasseri, Niccolo Pescetelli, Tobias Werner
From fake social media accounts and generative-AI chatbots to financial trading algorithms and self-driving vehicles, robots, bots, and algorithms are proliferating and permeating our communication channels, social interactions, economic transactions, and transportation arteries. Networks of multiple interdependent and interacting humans and autonomous machines constitute complex social systems where the collective outcomes cannot be deduced from either human or machine behavior alone. Under this paradigm, we review recent research from across a range of disciplines and identify general dynamics and patterns in situations of competition, coordination, cooperation, contagion, and collective decision-making, with context-rich examples from high-frequency trading markets, a social media platform, an open-collaboration community, and a discussion forum. To ensure more robust and resilient human-machine communities, researchers should study them using complex-system methods, engineers should explicitly design AI for human-machine and machine-machine interactions, and regulators should govern the ecological diversity and social co-evolution of humans and machines.
Read more7/15/2024