The Sociotechnical Stack: Opportunities for Social Computing Research in Non-consensual Intimate Media

Overview

• This paper examines the issue of non-consensual intimate media (NCIM), which involves sharing intimate content without the depicted person's consent, including revenge porn and sexually explicit deepfakes.
• While NCIM has been studied in legal, psychological, and communication fields, the computing scholarship on this topic has been limited.
• The paper aims to bridge this gap by linking NCIM harms to the specific technological components that facilitate them.
• It introduces the "sociotechnical stack," a conceptual framework for mapping the technical stack to its corresponding social impacts.
• The paper proposes a research roadmap for computing and social computing communities to deter NCIM perpetration and support victim-survivors.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses the issue of non-consensual intimate media (NCIM), which refers to the sharing of intimate content without the consent of the person depicted. This can include things like revenge porn and deepfake videos. While NCIM has been studied in other fields, the authors feel that the computing community has not focused on it enough.

The paper introduces a new way of thinking about this problem, called the "sociotechnical stack." This framework helps connect the technical aspects of how NCIM content is created and shared with the real-world harms it causes. By understanding these connections, the authors hope to inspire more computing research that can help prevent NCIM and support those who have been affected by it.

The paper lays out a roadmap for how computing researchers, including those in the social computing field, can tackle this issue. This could involve developing new technologies to deter NCIM perpetration or building tools to help victims cope with the aftermath.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by highlighting the growing problem of non-consensual intimate media (NCIM), which encompasses revenge porn, deepfakes, and other forms of intimate content shared without a person's consent. While NCIM has been examined in legal, psychological, and communication research, the authors argue that the computing field has not contributed enough to this area.

To address this gap, the paper introduces the "sociotechnical stack" - a conceptual framework that maps the technical components enabling NCIM to the corresponding social harms. This framework allows the authors to analyze NCIM as a sociotechnical problem and identify opportunities for computing research.

The sociotechnical stack consists of several layers, including [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/feminist-interaction-techniques-deterring-non-consensual-screenshots] content creation, [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/cyberbully-online-harassment-issues-associated-digital-wellbeing] content distribution, and [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/public-computing-intellectuals-age-ai-crisis] platform governance. For each layer, the authors discuss the technical components involved and the corresponding social harms, such as emotional distress, reputation damage, and stalking.

Building on this framework, the paper proposes a research roadmap for computing and social computing communities. This includes developing [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/mathematical-framework-problem-security-cognition-neurotechnology] techniques to deter NCIM perpetration, as well as creating tools to [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/illuminating-unseen-investigating-context-induced-harms-behavioral] support victim-survivors.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable conceptual framework for understanding NCIM as a sociotechnical problem, which is a significant contribution to the field. By linking the technical components to their social impacts, the authors highlight important areas for computing research to address.

However, the paper acknowledges that the sociotechnical stack is a simplification of a complex issue, and there may be other factors and layers that influence NCIM harms. Additionally, the specific research directions outlined in the roadmap may need to be refined and expanded upon based on further investigation and input from diverse stakeholders.

It is also important to note that while the paper focuses on technological solutions, addressing NCIM will likely require a multifaceted approach that also includes legal, educational, and social interventions. The computing community should work in collaboration with other disciplines to develop a comprehensive response to this challenge.

Conclusion

This paper presents a compelling case for the computing community to play a more active role in addressing the issue of non-consensual intimate media (NCIM). By introducing the sociotechnical stack framework, the authors have provided a valuable tool for analyzing NCIM as a complex, technology-enabled problem.

The proposed research roadmap offers a starting point for computing and social computing researchers to develop new techniques and tools to deter NCIM perpetration and support victim-survivors. Implementing these solutions, in conjunction with efforts in other domains, has the potential to make a meaningful impact in mitigating the harms of NCIM and promoting digital safety and well-being.