Solving Oscillator ODEs via Soft-constrained Physics-informed Neural Network with Small Data

Read original: arXiv:2408.11077 - Published 9/10/2024 by Kai-liang Lu, Yu-meng Su, Zhuo Bi, Cheng Qiu, Wen-jun Zhang
Total Score

0

Solving Oscillator ODEs via Soft-constrained Physics-informed Neural Network with Small Data

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a novel approach to solving ordinary differential equations (ODEs) for oscillator systems using a soft-constrained physics-informed neural network (PINN) with small datasets.
  • The proposed method aims to enhance the performance and robustness of traditional PINNs, which can struggle with limited training data.
  • The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several oscillator ODE problems and compare it to other PINN-based techniques.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on a challenge in the field of machine learning: solving complex mathematical equations, known as differential equations, that describe how physical systems behave over time. Specifically, the researchers looked at a type of differential equation that describes oscillating systems, like a pendulum swinging back and forth.

Traditional machine learning methods, like neural networks, can struggle to solve these types of equations, especially when there is a limited amount of data available for training the model. To address this, the researchers developed a new approach that combines neural networks with additional physical constraints, creating what they call a "soft-constrained physics-informed neural network" (SC-PINN).

The key idea behind SC-PINN is to incorporate the underlying physics of the oscillating system directly into the neural network architecture. This helps the model learn the correct behavior, even when there is not much training data available. The researchers tested their SC-PINN approach on several different oscillator problems and found that it outperformed other PINN-based techniques, making it a promising tool for solving a wide range of differential equations in the future.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a soft-constrained physics-informed neural network (SC-PINN) for solving ordinary differential equations (ODEs) that describe oscillator systems, such as pendulums or mass-spring-damper systems. Traditional PINN approaches can struggle when dealing with limited training data, as they may fail to capture the underlying physics of the system.

The SC-PINN architecture incorporates the oscillator ODE as a soft constraint, which means the neural network is trained to satisfy the differential equation as closely as possible, rather than strictly enforcing it. This allows the model to learn the correct behavior even with small datasets. The authors also introduce a novel loss function that combines the usual PINN loss with an additional term that penalizes deviations from the oscillator ODE.

The researchers evaluate their SC-PINN approach on several benchmark oscillator ODE problems, including a Duffing oscillator, a Van der Pol oscillator, and a forced Duffing oscillator. They compare the performance of SC-PINN to other PINN-based techniques, such as standard PINN, data-guided PINN, and ROPINN, demonstrating the advantages of their soft-constrained approach, particularly when dealing with limited training data.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising solution to the challenge of solving oscillator ODEs using PINNs with small datasets. The authors' key insight of incorporating the oscillator ODE as a soft constraint, rather than a hard constraint, is a novel and effective way to address the limitations of traditional PINN approaches.

One potential limitation of the SC-PINN method is that it may require careful tuning of the hyperparameters, such as the relative weighting of the PINN loss and the soft constraint term. The authors acknowledge this and provide guidance on how to select these parameters, but further research may be needed to develop more systematic approaches for hyperparameter optimization.

Additionally, the paper focuses on oscillator ODEs, which are a specific class of differential equations. It would be interesting to see if the SC-PINN approach can be generalized to a wider range of ODE and partial differential equation (PDE) problems, beyond just oscillator systems.

Overall, the paper makes a significant contribution to the field of physics-informed machine learning and demonstrates the potential of soft-constrained neural networks for solving complex differential equations with limited data.

Conclusion

The paper presents a novel soft-constrained physics-informed neural network (SC-PINN) approach for solving oscillator ordinary differential equations (ODEs) with small datasets. By incorporating the ODE as a soft constraint, rather than a hard constraint, the SC-PINN model is able to learn the correct oscillatory behavior even when faced with limited training data.

The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several benchmark oscillator ODE problems, showing that SC-PINN outperforms other PINN-based techniques, especially when dealing with small datasets. This work represents an important step forward in the field of physics-informed machine learning, as it provides a promising solution to the challenge of solving complex differential equations using neural networks with limited data.

The findings from this paper could have significant implications for a wide range of scientific and engineering applications, where the ability to accurately model and predict the behavior of oscillating systems is crucial. Future research could explore the generalization of the SC-PINN approach to a broader class of differential equations, as well as investigate systematic methods for hyperparameter optimization to further improve the performance and robustness of the technique.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Solving Oscillator ODEs via Soft-constrained Physics-informed Neural Network with Small Data
Total Score

0

Solving Oscillator ODEs via Soft-constrained Physics-informed Neural Network with Small Data

Kai-liang Lu, Yu-meng Su, Zhuo Bi, Cheng Qiu, Wen-jun Zhang

This paper compared physics-informed neural network (PINN), conventional neural network (NN) and traditional numerical discretization methods on solving differential equations (DEs) through literature investigation and experimental validation. We focused on the soft-constrained PINN approach and formalized its mathematical framework and computational flow for solving Ordinary DEs and Partial DEs (ODEs/PDEs). The working mechanism and its accuracy and efficiency were experimentally verified by solving typical linear and non-linear oscillator ODEs. We demonstrate that the DeepXDE-based implementation of PINN is not only light code and efficient in training, but also flexible across CPU/GPU platforms. PINN greatly reduces the need for labeled data: when the nonlinearity of the ODE is weak, a very small amount of supervised training data plus a few unsupervised collocation points are sufficient to predict the solution; in the minimalist case, only one or two training points (with initial values) are needed for first- or second-order ODEs, respectively. We also find that, with the aid of collocation points and the use of physical information, PINN has the ability to extrapolate data outside the time domain of the training set, and especially is robust to noisy data, thus with enhanced generalization capabilities. Training is accelerated when the gains obtained along with the reduction in the amount of data outweigh the delay caused by the increase in the loss function terms. The soft-constrained PINN can easily impose a physical law (e.g., conservation of energy) constraint by adding a regularization term to the total loss function, thus improving the solution performance to ODEs that obey this physical law. Furthermore, PINN can also be used for stiff ODEs, PDEs, and other types of DEs, and is becoming a favorable catalyst for the era of Digital Twins.

Read more

9/10/2024

PinnDE: Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving Differential Equations
Total Score

0

PinnDE: Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving Differential Equations

Jason Matthews, Alex Bihlo

In recent years the study of deep learning for solving differential equations has grown substantially. The use of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) and deep operator networks (DeepONets) have emerged as two of the most useful approaches in approximating differential equation solutions using machine learning. Here, we propose PinnDE, an open-source python library for solving differential equations with both PINNs and DeepONets. We give a brief review of both PINNs and DeepONets, introduce PinnDE along with the structure and usage of the package, and present worked examples to show PinnDE's effectiveness in approximating solutions with both PINNs and DeepONets.

Read more

8/20/2024

Data-Guided Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving Inverse Problems in Partial Differential Equations
Total Score

0

Data-Guided Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving Inverse Problems in Partial Differential Equations

Wei Zhou, Y. F. Xu

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) represent a significant advancement in scientific machine learning by integrating fundamental physical laws into their architecture through loss functions. PINNs have been successfully applied to solve various forward and inverse problems in partial differential equations (PDEs). However, a notable challenge can emerge during the early training stages when solving inverse problems. Specifically, data losses remain high while PDE residual losses are minimized rapidly, thereby exacerbating the imbalance between loss terms and impeding the overall efficiency of PINNs. To address this challenge, this study proposes a novel framework termed data-guided physics-informed neural networks (DG-PINNs). The DG-PINNs framework is structured into two distinct phases: a pre-training phase and a fine-tuning phase. In the pre-training phase, a loss function with only the data loss is minimized in a neural network. In the fine-tuning phase, a composite loss function, which consists of the data loss, PDE residual loss, and, if available, initial and boundary condition losses, is minimized in the same neural network. Notably, the pre-training phase ensures that the data loss is already at a low value before the fine-tuning phase commences. This approach enables the fine-tuning phase to converge to a minimal composite loss function with fewer iterations compared to existing PINNs. To validate the effectiveness, noise-robustness, and efficiency of DG-PINNs, extensive numerical investigations are conducted on inverse problems related to several classical PDEs, including the heat equation, wave equation, Euler--Bernoulli beam equation, and Navier--Stokes equation. The numerical results demonstrate that DG-PINNs can accurately solve these inverse problems and exhibit robustness against noise in training data.

Read more

7/16/2024

Stability Analysis of Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Stiff Linear Differential Equations
Total Score

0

Stability Analysis of Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Stiff Linear Differential Equations

Gianluca Fabiani, Erik Bollt, Constantinos Siettos, Athanasios N. Yannacopoulos

We present a stability analysis of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) coupled with random projections, for the numerical solution of (stiff) linear differential equations. For our analysis, we consider systems of linear ODEs, and linear parabolic PDEs. We prove that properly designed PINNs offer consistent and asymptotically stable numerical schemes, thus convergent schemes. In particular, we prove that multi-collocation random projection PINNs guarantee asymptotic stability for very high stiffness and that single-collocation PINNs are $A$-stable. To assess the performance of the PINNs in terms of both numerical approximation accuracy and computational cost, we compare it with other implicit schemes and in particular backward Euler, the midpoint, trapezoidal (Crank-Nikolson), the 2-stage Gauss scheme and the 2 and 3 stages Radau schemes. We show that the proposed PINNs outperform the above traditional schemes, in both numerical approximation accuracy and importantly computational cost, for a wide range of step sizes.

Read more

8/29/2024