Space3D-Bench: Spatial 3D Question Answering Benchmark
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Presents a new benchmark called Space3D-Bench for spatial 3D question answering
- Benchmark evaluates the ability of language models to answer questions about 3D scenes
- Includes a diverse dataset of 3D scenes and corresponding question-answer pairs
- Aims to spur progress in multimodal reasoning and 3D scene understanding
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new benchmark called Space3D-Bench that is designed to evaluate how well language models can answer questions about 3D scenes. The benchmark includes a diverse dataset of 3D scenes, such as urban environments and indoor rooms, along with corresponding questions and answers.
The goal of this benchmark is to drive advancement in the field of multimodal reasoning, where language models need to integrate information from both text and 3D visual data to arrive at the correct answers. By testing language models on their ability to understand and reason about 3D spatial relationships, the benchmark aims to spur progress in 3D scene understanding - a key capability for applications like robotics, augmented reality, and virtual assistants.
Technical Explanation
The Space3D-Bench dataset consists of over 110,000 question-answer pairs based on 3D scenes from the Matterport3D and ScanNet datasets. The questions cover a range of spatial concepts, such as object locations, spatial relationships, and physical interactions.
The benchmark evaluates language models using both retrieval-based and generation-based question answering tasks. In the retrieval task, models must select the correct answer from a multiple-choice list. In the generation task, models must generate the answer in free-form text.
The paper presents baseline results using several state-of-the-art vision-language models, including CLIP, LXMERT, and VinVL. The results demonstrate that while these models perform reasonably well, there is significant room for improvement, highlighting the challenge of spatial 3D question answering.
Critical Analysis
The Space3D-Bench dataset and benchmark provide a valuable new resource for advancing research in multimodal reasoning and 3D scene understanding. However, the paper acknowledges several limitations:
- The dataset is limited to indoor scenes and may not capture the full complexity of real-world 3D environments.
- The questions focus on static spatial relationships and do not test dynamic spatial reasoning, such as reasoning about object movements or interactions.
- The baseline models struggle to achieve human-level performance, suggesting that significant progress is still needed in this area.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential biases or inconsistencies in the dataset, which could impact the reliability of the benchmark. Further research is needed to thoroughly evaluate and refine the dataset and benchmark.
Conclusion
The Space3D-Bench benchmark represents an important step forward in the evaluation of language models' ability to understand and reason about 3D spatial relationships. By providing a standardized dataset and evaluation protocol, the benchmark can help drive progress in multimodal reasoning and 3D scene understanding - capabilities that will be increasingly important for a wide range of real-world applications. While the current results demonstrate significant challenges, the benchmark serves as a valuable tool for researchers to develop more advanced models and techniques in this emerging field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Space3D-Bench: Spatial 3D Question Answering Benchmark
Emilia Szymanska, Mihai Dusmanu, Jan-Willem Buurlage, Mahdi Rad, Marc Pollefeys
Answering questions about the spatial properties of the environment poses challenges for existing language and vision foundation models due to a lack of understanding of the 3D world notably in terms of relationships between objects. To push the field forward, multiple 3D Q&A datasets were proposed which, overall, provide a variety of questions, but they individually focus on particular aspects of 3D reasoning or are limited in terms of data modalities. To address this, we present Space3D-Bench - a collection of 1000 general spatial questions and answers related to scenes of the Replica dataset which offers a variety of data modalities: point clouds, posed RGB-D images, navigation meshes and 3D object detections. To ensure that the questions cover a wide range of 3D objectives, we propose an indoor spatial questions taxonomy inspired by geographic information systems and use it to balance the dataset accordingly. Moreover, we provide an assessment system that grades natural language responses based on predefined ground-truth answers by leveraging a Vision Language Model's comprehension of both text and images to compare the responses with ground-truth textual information or relevant visual data. Finally, we introduce a baseline called RAG3D-Chat integrating the world understanding of foundation models with rich context retrieval, achieving an accuracy of 67% on the proposed dataset.
Read more9/17/2024
0
3D Question Answering for City Scene Understanding
Penglei Sun, Yaoxian Song, Xiang Liu, Xiaofei Yang, Qiang Wang, Tiefeng Li, Yang Yang, Xiaowen Chu
3D multimodal question answering (MQA) plays a crucial role in scene understanding by enabling intelligent agents to comprehend their surroundings in 3D environments. While existing research has primarily focused on indoor household tasks and outdoor roadside autonomous driving tasks, there has been limited exploration of city-level scene understanding tasks. Furthermore, existing research faces challenges in understanding city scenes, due to the absence of spatial semantic information and human-environment interaction information at the city level.To address these challenges, we investigate 3D MQA from both dataset and method perspectives. From the dataset perspective, we introduce a novel 3D MQA dataset named City-3DQA for city-level scene understanding, which is the first dataset to incorporate scene semantic and human-environment interactive tasks within the city. From the method perspective, we propose a Scene graph enhanced City-level Understanding method (Sg-CityU), which utilizes the scene graph to introduce the spatial semantic. A new benchmark is reported and our proposed Sg-CityU achieves accuracy of 63.94 % and 63.76 % in different settings of City-3DQA. Compared to indoor 3D MQA methods and zero-shot using advanced large language models (LLMs), Sg-CityU demonstrates state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance in robustness and generalization.
Read more7/25/2024
0
Multimodal Datasets and Benchmarks for Reasoning about Dynamic Spatio-Temporality in Everyday Environments
Takanori Ugai, Kensho Hara, Shusaku Egami, Ken Fukuda
We used a 3D simulator to create artificial video data with standardized annotations, aiming to aid in the development of Embodied AI. Our question answering (QA) dataset measures the extent to which a robot can understand human behavior and the environment in a home setting. Preliminary experiments suggest our dataset is useful in measuring AI's comprehension of daily life. end{abstract}
Read more9/18/2024
0
Reframing Spatial Reasoning Evaluation in Language Models: A Real-World Simulation Benchmark for Qualitative Reasoning
Fangjun Li, David C. Hogg, Anthony G. Cohn
Spatial reasoning plays a vital role in both human cognition and machine intelligence, prompting new research into language models' (LMs) capabilities in this regard. However, existing benchmarks reveal shortcomings in evaluating qualitative spatial reasoning (QSR). These benchmarks typically present oversimplified scenarios or unclear natural language descriptions, hindering effective evaluation. We present a novel benchmark for assessing QSR in LMs, which is grounded in realistic 3D simulation data, offering a series of diverse room layouts with various objects and their spatial relationships. This approach provides a more detailed and context-rich narrative for spatial reasoning evaluation, diverging from traditional, toy-task-oriented scenarios. Our benchmark encompasses a broad spectrum of qualitative spatial relationships, including topological, directional, and distance relations. These are presented with different viewing points, varied granularities, and density of relation constraints to mimic real-world complexities. A key contribution is our logic-based consistency-checking tool, which enables the assessment of multiple plausible solutions, aligning with real-world scenarios where spatial relationships are often open to interpretation. Our benchmark evaluation of advanced LMs reveals their strengths and limitations in spatial reasoning. They face difficulties with multi-hop spatial reasoning and interpreting a mix of different view descriptions, pointing to areas for future improvement.
Read more5/27/2024