Spatial Bayesian Neural Networks
2311.09491
0
0
🧠
Abstract
interpretable, and well understood models that are routinely employed even though, as is revealed through prior and posterior predictive checks, these can poorly characterise the spatial heterogeneity in the underlying process of interest. Here, we propose a new, flexible class of spatial-process models, which we refer to as spatial Bayesian neural networks (SBNNs). An SBNN leverages the representational capacity of a Bayesian neural network; it is tailored to a spatial setting by incorporating a spatial ``embedding layer'' into the network and, possibly, spatially-varying network parameters. An SBNN is calibrated by matching its finite-dimensional distribution at locations on a fine gridding of space to that of a target process of interest. That process could be easy to simulate from or we may have many realisations from it. We propose several variants of SBNNs, most of which are able to match the finite-dimensional distribution of the target process at the selected grid better than conventional BNNs of similar complexity. We also show that an SBNN can be used to represent a variety of spatial processes often used in practice, such as Gaussian processes, lognormal processes, and max-stable processes. We briefly discuss the tools that could be used to make inference with SBNNs, and we conclude with a discussion of their advantages and limitations.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- Proposes a new class of flexible spatial-process models called spatial Bayesian neural networks (SBNNs)
- SBNNs leverage the representational capacity of Bayesian neural networks and incorporate spatial components to better capture spatial heterogeneity
- SBNNs can be calibrated to match the finite-dimensional distribution of a target spatial process, which could be easy to simulate or have many realizations
- Several variants of SBNNs are shown to outperform conventional Bayesian neural networks in matching target spatial processes
- SBNNs can represent a variety of spatial processes used in practice, such as Gaussian processes, lognormal processes, and max-stable processes
Plain English Explanation
Spatial processes are mathematical models used to describe how a phenomenon varies across space. For example, they could be used to model the distribution of rainfall or air pollution levels across a region. However, interpretable, and well understood models that are commonly used may not always accurately capture the complex spatial patterns in the underlying process.
The researchers propose a new type of spatial model called a spatial Bayesian neural network (SBNN). SBNNs are a flexible class of models that leverage the power of Bayesian neural networks to better represent spatial patterns. They do this by incorporating a special "spatial embedding layer" into the neural network, which allows the model to learn the spatial relationships in the data.
SBNNs can be trained to match the statistical properties of a target spatial process, which could be something easy to simulate or something we have many real-world examples of, like measurements of air pollution levels. The researchers show that several variants of SBNNs can match the target process better than standard Bayesian neural networks of similar complexity.
Importantly, SBNNs can be used to represent a wide range of spatial processes commonly used in practice, such as Gaussian processes, lognormal processes, and max-stable processes. This versatility makes SBNNs a powerful tool for modeling complex spatial phenomena.
Technical Explanation
The core idea behind spatial Bayesian neural networks (SBNNs) is to leverage the representational capacity of Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) and tailor them to spatial settings. BNNs are a flexible class of models that can learn complex patterns from data, but they do not inherently capture spatial relationships.
To address this, the researchers introduce a "spatial embedding layer" into the BNN architecture. This layer learns a low-dimensional representation of the spatial coordinates, which is then incorporated into the subsequent layers of the neural network. This allows the SBNN to learn spatial patterns in the data.
The SBNN is trained by matching its finite-dimensional distribution at locations on a fine grid of the spatial domain to that of a target spatial process. This target process could be something easy to simulate from, or it could be a real-world spatial process for which the researchers have many realizations (e.g., measurements of a environmental variable across a region).
The researchers propose several variants of the SBNN, which differ in terms of the specific architecture and how the spatial embedding is incorporated. They show that these SBNN variants can often match the finite-dimensional distribution of the target process better than conventional BNNs of similar complexity.
Importantly, the researchers demonstrate that SBNNs can be used to represent a variety of spatial processes commonly used in practice, such as Gaussian processes, lognormal processes, and max-stable processes. This versatility makes SBNNs a powerful tool for modeling complex spatial phenomena.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several caveats and limitations of their SBNN approach. First, they note that making inference with SBNNs may be computationally challenging, as it requires techniques like Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling. This could limit the scalability of the approach to very large spatial domains.
Additionally, the researchers do not provide a rigorous theoretical analysis of the SBNN's approximation capabilities. While they demonstrate empirically that SBNNs can outperform conventional BNNs, a more thorough understanding of the model's representational power and convergence properties would be valuable.
Another potential issue is the sensitivity of the SBNN's performance to the choice of hyperparameters, such as the architecture of the neural network and the details of the spatial embedding layer. The researchers do not explore the robustness of their approach to these design choices, which could limit its practical applicability.
Despite these limitations, the SBNN framework represents an interesting and potentially impactful contribution to the field of spatial modeling. By leveraging the flexibility of Bayesian neural networks and incorporating spatial components, the researchers have developed a new class of models that can better capture the complex spatial heterogeneity observed in many real-world phenomena.
Conclusion
The proposed spatial Bayesian neural network (SBNN) framework represents a promising new approach to modeling spatial processes. By combining the representational power of Bayesian neural networks with spatial components, SBNNs can better capture the complex spatial patterns often observed in real-world data, outperforming conventional models.
The versatility of SBNNs, which can be used to model a variety of spatial processes, makes them a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners working in fields such as environmental science, geography, and urban planning. While the approach has some limitations that require further investigation, the SBNN framework is a significant step forward in the field of spatial modeling and has the potential to lead to important advancements in our understanding of complex spatial phenomena.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Enhancing Lithological Mapping with Spatially Constrained Bayesian Network (SCB-Net): An Approach for Field Data-Constrained Predictions with Uncertainty Evaluation
Victor Silva dos Santos, Erwan Gloaguen, Shiva Tirdad
0
0
Geological maps are an extremely valuable source of information for the Earth sciences. They provide insights into mineral exploration, vulnerability to natural hazards, and many other applications. These maps are created using numerical or conceptual models that use geological observations to extrapolate data. Geostatistical techniques have traditionally been used to generate reliable predictions that take into account the spatial patterns inherent in the data. However, as the number of auxiliary variables increases, these methods become more labor-intensive. Additionally, traditional machine learning methods often struggle with spatially correlated data and extracting valuable non-linear information from geoscientific datasets. To address these limitations, a new architecture called the Spatially Constrained Bayesian Network (SCB-Net) has been developed. The SCB-Net aims to effectively exploit the information from auxiliary variables while producing spatially constrained predictions. It is made up of two parts, the first part focuses on learning underlying patterns in the auxiliary variables while the second part integrates ground-truth data and the learned embeddings from the first part. Moreover, to assess model uncertainty, a technique called Monte Carlo dropout is used as a Bayesian approximation. The SCB-Net has been applied to two selected areas in northern Quebec, Canada, and has demonstrated its potential in generating field-data-constrained lithological maps while allowing assessment of prediction uncertainty for decision-making. This study highlights the promising advancements of deep neural networks in geostatistics, particularly in handling complex spatial feature learning tasks, leading to improved spatial information techniques.
4/1/2024
Restricted Bayesian Neural Network
Sourav Ganguly, Saprativa Bhattacharjee
0
0
Modern deep learning tools are remarkably effective in addressing intricate problems. However, their operation as black-box models introduces increased uncertainty in predictions. Additionally, they contend with various challenges, including the need for substantial storage space in large networks, issues of overfitting, underfitting, vanishing gradients, and more. This study explores the concept of Bayesian Neural Networks, presenting a novel architecture designed to significantly alleviate the storage space complexity of a network. Furthermore, we introduce an algorithm adept at efficiently handling uncertainties, ensuring robust convergence values without becoming trapped in local optima, particularly when the objective function lacks perfect convexity.
4/9/2024
🧠
A Study of Bayesian Neural Network Surrogates for Bayesian Optimization
Yucen Lily Li, Tim G. J. Rudner, Andrew Gordon Wilson
0
0
Bayesian optimization is a highly efficient approach to optimizing objective functions which are expensive to query. These objectives are typically represented by Gaussian process (GP) surrogate models which are easy to optimize and support exact inference. While standard GP surrogates have been well-established in Bayesian optimization, Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) have recently become practical function approximators, with many benefits over standard GPs such as the ability to naturally handle non-stationarity and learn representations for high-dimensional data. In this paper, we study BNNs as alternatives to standard GP surrogates for optimization. We consider a variety of approximate inference procedures for finite-width BNNs, including high-quality Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, low-cost stochastic MCMC, and heuristics such as deep ensembles. We also consider infinite-width BNNs, linearized Laplace approximations, and partially stochastic models such as deep kernel learning. We evaluate this collection of surrogate models on diverse problems with varying dimensionality, number of objectives, non-stationarity, and discrete and continuous inputs. We find: (i) the ranking of methods is highly problem dependent, suggesting the need for tailored inductive biases; (ii) HMC is the most successful approximate inference procedure for fully stochastic BNNs; (iii) full stochasticity may be unnecessary as deep kernel learning is relatively competitive; (iv) deep ensembles perform relatively poorly; (v) infinite-width BNNs are particularly promising, especially in high dimensions.
5/9/2024
New!Active Learning with Fully Bayesian Neural Networks for Discontinuous and Nonstationary Data
Maxim Ziatdinov
0
0
Active learning optimizes the exploration of large parameter spaces by strategically selecting which experiments or simulations to conduct, thus reducing resource consumption and potentially accelerating scientific discovery. A key component of this approach is a probabilistic surrogate model, typically a Gaussian Process (GP), which approximates an unknown functional relationship between control parameters and a target property. However, conventional GPs often struggle when applied to systems with discontinuities and non-stationarities, prompting the exploration of alternative models. This limitation becomes particularly relevant in physical science problems, which are often characterized by abrupt transitions between different system states and rapid changes in physical property behavior. Fully Bayesian Neural Networks (FBNNs) serve as a promising substitute, treating all neural network weights probabilistically and leveraging advanced Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques for direct sampling from the posterior distribution. This approach enables FBNNs to provide reliable predictive distributions, crucial for making informed decisions under uncertainty in the active learning setting. Although traditionally considered too computationally expensive for 'big data' applications, many physical sciences problems involve small amounts of data in relatively low-dimensional parameter spaces. Here, we assess the suitability and performance of FBNNs with the No-U-Turn Sampler for active learning tasks in the 'small data' regime, highlighting their potential to enhance predictive accuracy and reliability on test functions relevant to problems in physical sciences.
5/20/2024