Spectral Clustering for Discrete Distributions
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Spectral clustering is a popular technique for grouping data points based on their similarity.
- This paper explores using spectral clustering for discrete distributions, such as histograms or probability mass functions.
- The key challenge is defining a meaningful distance metric between discrete distributions, which is addressed using optimal transport distances and maximum mean discrepancy.
Plain English Explanation
Spectral clustering is a way of grouping similar data points together by looking at the "spectrum" or eigenvalues of the data. Typically, it's used for continuous data like numbers or vectors, but this paper looks at how to use it for discrete distributions, which are like histograms or probability mass functions.
The tricky part is figuring out how to measure the distance between these discrete distributions. The paper uses two different approaches - optimal transport distances and maximum mean discrepancy. These allow you to quantify how different two discrete distributions are from each other.
Once you have a good way to compare the distributions, you can then use spectral clustering to group them into similar clusters. This could be useful for things like clustering mixtures of discrete distributions or dimensionality reduction of discrete data.
Technical Explanation
The paper first reviews the basics of spectral clustering and how it can be applied to discrete distributions. Traditionally, spectral clustering relies on defining a similarity or affinity matrix between data points. For continuous data, this is straightforward using metrics like Euclidean distance.
However, for discrete distributions, the authors argue that more specialized distances are needed. They explore two approaches:
-
Optimal Transport Distances: These metrics quantify the cost of "moving" one distribution to another, and can capture subtle differences between distributions.
-
Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD): This compares the expected values of the distributions under different feature mappings, providing a flexible way to compare distributions.
The paper then discusses how to incorporate these distance metrics into the spectral clustering framework, including computing the Laplacian matrix and performing eigendecomposition.
The authors evaluate their approach on both synthetic and real-world datasets, showing that spectral clustering with optimal transport or MMD distances can outperform baseline methods for clustering discrete distributions.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a well-motivated and principled approach to extending spectral clustering to discrete distributions. The use of optimal transport and MMD distances is a clever way to tackle the core challenge of defining meaningful similarities between histograms or probability mass functions.
One potential limitation is the computational complexity of computing these specialized distance metrics, which could make the approach less scalable for very large datasets. The authors acknowledge this and discuss potential approximation techniques.
Additionally, the paper focuses on clustering discrete distributions, but there may be other applications of this framework, such as dimensionality reduction or anomaly detection, that could be worth exploring further.
Overall, this paper represents an important contribution to the field of clustering and unsupervised learning for discrete data, with practical implications for a wide range of domains.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach for applying spectral clustering to discrete distributions, overcoming the challenge of defining appropriate distance metrics. By leveraging optimal transport distances and maximum mean discrepancy, the authors demonstrate how spectral clustering can be effectively used to group and analyze histogram-like data.
The technical insights and experimental results highlight the potential of this framework to advance the state-of-the-art in clustering and unsupervised learning for a variety of discrete data applications. As the volume and complexity of discrete data continues to grow, techniques like the one described in this paper will become increasingly important for extracting meaningful insights and patterns from such information.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Spectral Clustering for Discrete Distributions
Zixiao Wang, Dong Qiao, Jicong Fan
The discrete distribution is often used to describe complex instances in machine learning, such as images, sequences, and documents. Traditionally, clustering of discrete distributions (D2C) has been approached using Wasserstein barycenter methods. These methods operate under the assumption that clusters can be well-represented by barycenters, which is seldom true in many real-world applications. Additionally, these methods are not scalable for large datasets due to the high computational cost of calculating Wasserstein barycenters. In this work, we explore the feasibility of using spectral clustering combined with distribution affinity measures (e.g., maximum mean discrepancy and Wasserstein distance) to cluster discrete distributions. We demonstrate that these methods can be more accurate and efficient than barycenter methods. To further enhance scalability, we propose using linear optimal transport to construct affinity matrices efficiently for large datasets. We provide theoretical guarantees for the success of our methods in clustering distributions. Experiments on both synthetic and real data show that our methods outperform existing baselines.
Read more8/19/2024
🔗
0
Spectral clustering in the Gaussian mixture block model
Shuangping Li, Tselil Schramm
Gaussian mixture block models are distributions over graphs that strive to model modern networks: to generate a graph from such a model, we associate each vertex $i$ with a latent feature vector $u_i in mathbb{R}^d$ sampled from a mixture of Gaussians, and we add edge $(i,j)$ if and only if the feature vectors are sufficiently similar, in that $langle u_i,u_j rangle ge tau$ for a pre-specified threshold $tau$. The different components of the Gaussian mixture represent the fact that there may be different types of nodes with different distributions over features -- for example, in a social network each component represents the different attributes of a distinct community. Natural algorithmic tasks associated with these networks are embedding (recovering the latent feature vectors) and clustering (grouping nodes by their mixture component). In this paper we initiate the study of clustering and embedding graphs sampled from high-dimensional Gaussian mixture block models, where the dimension of the latent feature vectors $dto infty$ as the size of the network $n to infty$. This high-dimensional setting is most appropriate in the context of modern networks, in which we think of the latent feature space as being high-dimensional. We analyze the performance of canonical spectral clustering and embedding algorithms for such graphs in the case of 2-component spherical Gaussian mixtures, and begin to sketch out the information-computation landscape for clustering and embedding in these models.
Read more4/12/2024
🔗
0
Clustering Mixtures of Discrete Distributions: A Note on Mitra's Algorithm
Mohamed Seif, Yanxi Chen
In this note, we provide a refined analysis of Mitra's algorithm cite{mitra2008clustering} for classifying general discrete mixture distribution models. Built upon spectral clustering cite{mcsherry2001spectral}, this algorithm offers compelling conditions for probability distributions. We enhance this analysis by tailoring the model to bipartite stochastic block models, resulting in more refined conditions. Compared to those derived in cite{mitra2008clustering}, our improved separation conditions are obtained.
Read more5/31/2024
0
Deep Clustering via Distribution Learning
Guanfang Dong, Zijie Tan, Chenqiu Zhao, Anup Basu
Distribution learning finds probability density functions from a set of data samples, whereas clustering aims to group similar data points to form clusters. Although there are deep clustering methods that employ distribution learning methods, past work still lacks theoretical analysis regarding the relationship between clustering and distribution learning. Thus, in this work, we provide a theoretical analysis to guide the optimization of clustering via distribution learning. To achieve better results, we embed deep clustering guided by a theoretical analysis. Furthermore, the distribution learning method cannot always be directly applied to data. To overcome this issue, we introduce a clustering-oriented distribution learning method called Monte-Carlo Marginalization for Clustering. We integrate Monte-Carlo Marginalization for Clustering into Deep Clustering, resulting in Deep Clustering via Distribution Learning (DCDL). Eventually, the proposed DCDL achieves promising results compared to state-of-the-art methods on popular datasets. Considering a clustering task, the new distribution learning method outperforms previous methods as well.
Read more8/9/2024