Statistically Optimal Generative Modeling with Maximum Deviation from the Empirical Distribution
2307.16422
0
0
🤷
Abstract
This paper explores the problem of generative modeling, aiming to simulate diverse examples from an unknown distribution based on observed examples. While recent studies have focused on quantifying the statistical precision of popular algorithms, there is a lack of mathematical evaluation regarding the non-replication of observed examples and the creativity of the generative model. We present theoretical insights into this aspect, demonstrating that the Wasserstein GAN, constrained to left-invertible push-forward maps, generates distributions that avoid replication and significantly deviate from the empirical distribution. Importantly, we show that left-invertibility achieves this without compromising the statistical optimality of the resulting generator. Our most important contribution provides a finite-sample lower bound on the Wasserstein-1 distance between the generative distribution and the empirical one. We also establish a finite-sample upper bound on the distance between the generative distribution and the true data-generating one. Both bounds are explicit and show the impact of key parameters such as sample size, dimensions of the ambient and latent spaces, noise level, and smoothness measured by the Lipschitz constant.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the problem of generative modeling, which aims to simulate diverse examples from an unknown distribution based on observed examples.
- The authors focus on evaluating the non-replication of observed examples and the creativity of the generative model, rather than just the statistical precision of popular algorithms.
- They present theoretical insights into this aspect, demonstrating that the Wasserstein GAN (WGAN), when constrained to left-invertible push-forward maps, generates distributions that avoid replication and significantly deviate from the empirical distribution.
- The authors provide a finite-sample lower bound on the Wasserstein-1 distance between the generative distribution and the empirical one, as well as a finite-sample upper bound on the distance between the generative distribution and the true data-generating one.
Plain English Explanation
Generative modeling is a type of machine learning that aims to create new examples that are similar to a set of observed examples. This is useful for tasks like generating realistic-looking images or text. However, the authors of this paper are interested in a different aspect of generative modeling: how "creative" or novel the generated examples are, rather than just how statistically accurate they are.
The authors focus on a specific type of generative model called the Wasserstein GAN (WGAN). They show that when the WGAN is constrained to use "left-invertible" mathematical functions, it generates examples that are quite different from the original observed examples. In other words, the WGAN doesn't just reproduce the original examples, but creates new ones that are substantially different.
The authors also provide mathematical bounds that quantify how different the generated examples are from both the original observed examples and the true underlying distribution that generated the observed examples. These bounds depend on factors like the size of the dataset, the complexity of the problem, and the amount of noise in the data.
Technical Explanation
The authors explore the problem of generative modeling, where the goal is to simulate diverse examples from an unknown distribution based on observed examples. While previous studies have focused on the statistical precision of popular algorithms like Wasserstein GAN, the authors are interested in evaluating the non-replication of observed examples and the creativity of the generative model.
The authors present theoretical insights, demonstrating that the Wasserstein GAN, when constrained to left-invertible push-forward maps, generates distributions that avoid replication and significantly deviate from the empirical distribution. Importantly, they show that left-invertibility achieves this without compromising the statistical optimality of the resulting generator.
The authors' most important contribution is a finite-sample lower bound on the Wasserstein-1 distance between the generative distribution and the empirical one, as well as a finite-sample upper bound on the distance between the generative distribution and the true data-generating one. These bounds are explicit and show the impact of key parameters such as sample size, dimensions of the ambient and latent spaces, noise level, and smoothness measured by the Lipschitz constant.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable theoretical insights into the non-replication and creativity aspects of generative modeling, which are important considerations beyond just the statistical precision of the models. The authors' focus on the Wasserstein GAN and their analysis of the impact of left-invertibility on the generated distributions is a thoughtful contribution.
However, the paper does not address the practical challenges of implementing left-invertible push-forward maps in real-world generative modeling tasks. It would be interesting to see how this theoretical framework translates to actual model architectures and training procedures.
Additionally, the paper does not consider the potential trade-offs between the non-replication/creativity properties and other desirable characteristics of generative models, such as sample quality, diversity, or mode coverage. A more comprehensive evaluation of the overall performance and practical implications of the proposed approach would be valuable.
Conclusion
This paper presents an important theoretical perspective on the problem of generative modeling, highlighting the need to go beyond just quantifying the statistical precision of algorithms and also consider the non-replication and creativity aspects of the generated examples. The authors' analysis of the Wasserstein GAN and their derivation of finite-sample bounds on the distance between the generative and true distributions provide a solid foundation for further research in this direction. While the practical implications of the proposed approach require further exploration, this work contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the capabilities and limitations of generative models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Generative Modeling by Minimizing the Wasserstein-2 Loss
Yu-Jui Huang, Zachariah Malik
0
0
This paper approaches the unsupervised learning problem by minimizing the second-order Wasserstein loss (the $W_2$ loss). The minimization is characterized by a distribution-dependent ordinary differential equation (ODE), whose dynamics involves the Kantorovich potential between a current estimated distribution and the true data distribution. A main result shows that the time-marginal law of the ODE converges exponentially to the true data distribution. To prove that the ODE has a unique solution, we first construct explicitly a solution to the associated nonlinear Fokker-Planck equation and show that it coincides with the unique gradient flow for the $W_2$ loss. Based on this, a unique solution to the ODE is built from Trevisan's superposition principle and the exponential convergence results. An Euler scheme is proposed for the distribution-dependent ODE and it is shown to correctly recover the gradient flow for the $W_2$ loss in the limit. An algorithm is designed by following the scheme and applying persistent training, which is natural in our gradient-flow framework. In both low- and high-dimensional experiments, our algorithm converges much faster than and outperforms Wasserstein generative adversarial networks, by increasing the level of persistent training appropriately.
6/21/2024
🏅
Sourcerer: Sample-based Maximum Entropy Source Distribution Estimation
Julius Vetter, Guy Moss, Cornelius Schroder, Richard Gao, Jakob H. Macke
0
0
Scientific modeling applications often require estimating a distribution of parameters consistent with a dataset of observations - an inference task also known as source distribution estimation. This problem can be ill-posed, however, since many different source distributions might produce the same distribution of data-consistent simulations. To make a principled choice among many equally valid sources, we propose an approach which targets the maximum entropy distribution, i.e., prioritizes retaining as much uncertainty as possible. Our method is purely sample-based - leveraging the Sliced-Wasserstein distance to measure the discrepancy between the dataset and simulations - and thus suitable for simulators with intractable likelihoods. We benchmark our method on several tasks, and show that it can recover source distributions with substantially higher entropy than recent source estimation methods, without sacrificing the fidelity of the simulations. Finally, to demonstrate the utility of our approach, we infer source distributions for parameters of the Hodgkin-Huxley model from experimental datasets with thousands of single-neuron measurements. In summary, we propose a principled method for inferring source distributions of scientific simulator parameters while retaining as much uncertainty as possible.
5/16/2024
🗣️
On diffusion-based generative models and their error bounds: The log-concave case with full convergence estimates
Stefano Bruno, Ying Zhang, Dong-Young Lim, Omer Deniz Akyildiz, Sotirios Sabanis
0
0
We provide full theoretical guarantees for the convergence behaviour of diffusion-based generative models under the assumption of strongly log-concave data distributions while our approximating class of functions used for score estimation is made of Lipschitz continuous functions. We demonstrate via a motivating example, sampling from a Gaussian distribution with unknown mean, the powerfulness of our approach. In this case, explicit estimates are provided for the associated optimization problem, i.e. score approximation, while these are combined with the corresponding sampling estimates. As a result, we obtain the best known upper bound estimates in terms of key quantities of interest, such as the dimension and rates of convergence, for the Wasserstein-2 distance between the data distribution (Gaussian with unknown mean) and our sampling algorithm. Beyond the motivating example and in order to allow for the use of a diverse range of stochastic optimizers, we present our results using an $L^2$-accurate score estimation assumption, which crucially is formed under an expectation with respect to the stochastic optimizer and our novel auxiliary process that uses only known information. This approach yields the best known convergence rate for our sampling algorithm.
4/23/2024
🤔
Convergence of flow-based generative models via proximal gradient descent in Wasserstein space
Xiuyuan Cheng, Jianfeng Lu, Yixin Tan, Yao Xie
0
0
Flow-based generative models enjoy certain advantages in computing the data generation and the likelihood, and have recently shown competitive empirical performance. Compared to the accumulating theoretical studies on related score-based diffusion models, analysis of flow-based models, which are deterministic in both forward (data-to-noise) and reverse (noise-to-data) directions, remain sparse. In this paper, we provide a theoretical guarantee of generating data distribution by a progressive flow model, the so-called JKO flow model, which implements the Jordan-Kinderleherer-Otto (JKO) scheme in a normalizing flow network. Leveraging the exponential convergence of the proximal gradient descent (GD) in Wasserstein space, we prove the Kullback-Leibler (KL) guarantee of data generation by a JKO flow model to be $O(varepsilon^2)$ when using $N lesssim log (1/varepsilon)$ many JKO steps ($N$ Residual Blocks in the flow) where $varepsilon $ is the error in the per-step first-order condition. The assumption on data density is merely a finite second moment, and the theory extends to data distributions without density and when there are inversion errors in the reverse process where we obtain KL-$W_2$ mixed error guarantees. The non-asymptotic convergence rate of the JKO-type $W_2$-proximal GD is proved for a general class of convex objective functionals that includes the KL divergence as a special case, which can be of independent interest. The analysis framework can extend to other first-order Wasserstein optimization schemes applied to flow-based generative models.
5/20/2024