Sourcerer: Sample-based Maximum Entropy Source Distribution Estimation
2402.07808
0
0
🏅
Abstract
Scientific modeling applications often require estimating a distribution of parameters consistent with a dataset of observations - an inference task also known as source distribution estimation. This problem can be ill-posed, however, since many different source distributions might produce the same distribution of data-consistent simulations. To make a principled choice among many equally valid sources, we propose an approach which targets the maximum entropy distribution, i.e., prioritizes retaining as much uncertainty as possible. Our method is purely sample-based - leveraging the Sliced-Wasserstein distance to measure the discrepancy between the dataset and simulations - and thus suitable for simulators with intractable likelihoods. We benchmark our method on several tasks, and show that it can recover source distributions with substantially higher entropy than recent source estimation methods, without sacrificing the fidelity of the simulations. Finally, to demonstrate the utility of our approach, we infer source distributions for parameters of the Hodgkin-Huxley model from experimental datasets with thousands of single-neuron measurements. In summary, we propose a principled method for inferring source distributions of scientific simulator parameters while retaining as much uncertainty as possible.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a method for inferring source distributions of parameters used in scientific simulations.
- The method aims to find the maximum entropy distribution, which retains as much uncertainty as possible, while still producing simulations that match the observed data.
- The approach is sample-based and uses the Sliced-Wasserstein distance to measure the discrepancy between the dataset and simulations, making it suitable for simulators with intractable likelihoods.
- The method is benchmarked on several tasks and shown to recover source distributions with higher entropy than recent source estimation methods, without sacrificing the fidelity of the simulations.
- The paper also demonstrates the utility of the approach by inferring source distributions for parameters of the Hodgkin-Huxley model from experimental datasets with thousands of single-neuron measurements.
Plain English Explanation
Scientific models often require estimating the distribution of parameters that best fit a set of observed data. This is known as source distribution estimation. However, this can be a challenging problem because there may be many different parameter distributions that could produce the same observed data.
The authors of this paper propose a new approach that aims to find the "maximum entropy" distribution - the one that retains the most uncertainty about the true parameter values, while still matching the observed data. This is like trying to find the broadest possible distribution that is still consistent with the data.
The key idea is to use a sample-based method that compares the observed data to simulations generated from different parameter distributions. It measures the discrepancy between the data and simulations using a mathematical distance called the Sliced-Wasserstein distance. This allows the method to work even when the simulator has an "intractable likelihood" - meaning it's not easy to calculate the probability of the data given the parameters.
The authors show that their method can recover parameter distributions with higher entropy (more uncertainty) than other recent techniques, without sacrificing the accuracy of the simulations. They also demonstrate the usefulness of their approach by applying it to infer parameters of a well-known neuron model from experimental data.
In summary, this paper presents a principled way to infer parameter distributions for scientific models that balances matching the observed data with retaining as much uncertainty as possible about the true parameter values.
Technical Explanation
The paper addresses the problem of source distribution estimation, which involves inferring the distribution of parameters used in a scientific simulation model given a dataset of observations. This is a challenging task because there may be many different parameter distributions that could produce the same observed data.
To address this, the authors propose a method that targets the maximum entropy distribution - the distribution that retains the most uncertainty about the true parameter values while still being consistent with the observed data. This is achieved through a sample-based approach that leverages the Sliced-Wasserstein distance to measure the discrepancy between the dataset and simulations.
The key advantages of this method are:
-
Suitability for intractable likelihoods: The sample-based nature of the approach makes it suitable for simulators with intractable likelihoods, where the probability of the data given the parameters cannot be easily calculated.
-
Retaining uncertainty: The method is designed to recover source distributions with substantially higher entropy (more uncertainty) than recent source estimation techniques, without sacrificing the fidelity of the simulations.
The authors benchmark their method on several tasks and demonstrate its ability to recover high-entropy source distributions. They also apply the method to infer source distributions for parameters of the Hodgkin-Huxley neuron model using experimental datasets with thousands of single-neuron measurements.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and well-designed approach to the challenge of source distribution estimation, which is an important problem in scientific modeling and simulation. The authors' focus on retaining as much uncertainty as possible in the inferred distributions is a principled and valuable contribution, as it can help researchers make more informed decisions when using the models.
One potential limitation of the method is that it relies on the Sliced-Wasserstein distance to measure the discrepancy between the data and simulations. While the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this metric, it may be worth exploring alternative distance measures, such as the Wasserstein distance or the Hinge-Wasserstein distance, to see if they can further improve the method's performance.
Additionally, the paper could have provided more details on the computational complexity and scalability of the proposed approach, as well as any potential limitations in handling high-dimensional parameter spaces or complex simulator models. Diffusion-based generative models offer an interesting avenue for extending the maximum entropy approach to more challenging simulation scenarios.
Overall, the paper presents a compelling and well-executed method for source distribution estimation, and the authors' focus on retaining uncertainty is a valuable contribution to the field of scientific modeling and simulation.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel approach for inferring source distributions of parameters used in scientific simulations. The key idea is to target the maximum entropy distribution, which retains as much uncertainty as possible about the true parameter values while still producing simulations that match the observed data.
The sample-based method leverages the Sliced-Wasserstein distance to measure the discrepancy between the dataset and simulations, making it suitable for simulators with intractable likelihoods. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through benchmarking on several tasks and by applying it to infer source distributions for parameters of the Hodgkin-Huxley neuron model.
This work represents an important step forward in the field of source distribution estimation, with potential applications in a wide range of scientific domains that rely on computational models and simulations. The authors' emphasis on retaining uncertainty can lead to more robust and well-informed decision-making, with implications for quantum algorithms and other areas of scientific research.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤷
Statistically Optimal Generative Modeling with Maximum Deviation from the Empirical Distribution
Elen Vardanyan, Sona Hunanyan, Tigran Galstyan, Arshak Minasyan, Arnak Dalalyan
0
0
This paper explores the problem of generative modeling, aiming to simulate diverse examples from an unknown distribution based on observed examples. While recent studies have focused on quantifying the statistical precision of popular algorithms, there is a lack of mathematical evaluation regarding the non-replication of observed examples and the creativity of the generative model. We present theoretical insights into this aspect, demonstrating that the Wasserstein GAN, constrained to left-invertible push-forward maps, generates distributions that avoid replication and significantly deviate from the empirical distribution. Importantly, we show that left-invertibility achieves this without compromising the statistical optimality of the resulting generator. Our most important contribution provides a finite-sample lower bound on the Wasserstein-1 distance between the generative distribution and the empirical one. We also establish a finite-sample upper bound on the distance between the generative distribution and the true data-generating one. Both bounds are explicit and show the impact of key parameters such as sample size, dimensions of the ambient and latent spaces, noise level, and smoothness measured by the Lipschitz constant.
6/7/2024
Out-of-Distribution Detection using Maximum Entropy Coding
Mojtaba Abolfazli, Mohammad Zaeri Amirani, Anders H{o}st-Madsen, June Zhang, Andras Bratincsak
0
0
Given a default distribution $P$ and a set of test data $x^M={x_1,x_2,ldots,x_M}$ this paper seeks to answer the question if it was likely that $x^M$ was generated by $P$. For discrete distributions, the definitive answer is in principle given by Kolmogorov-Martin-L{o}f randomness. In this paper we seek to generalize this to continuous distributions. We consider a set of statistics $T_1(x^M),T_2(x^M),ldots$. To each statistic we associate its maximum entropy distribution and with this a universal source coder. The maximum entropy distributions are subsequently combined to give a total codelength, which is compared with $-log P(x^M)$. We show that this approach satisfied a number of theoretical properties. For real world data $P$ usually is unknown. We transform data into a standard distribution in the latent space using a bidirectional generate network and use maximum entropy coding there. We compare the resulting method to other methods that also used generative neural networks to detect anomalies. In most cases, our results show better performance.
4/29/2024
↗️
Hinge-Wasserstein: Estimating Multimodal Aleatoric Uncertainty in Regression Tasks
Ziliang Xiong, Arvi Jonnarth, Abdelrahman Eldesokey, Joakim Johnander, Bastian Wandt, Per-Erik Forssen
0
0
Computer vision systems that are deployed in safety-critical applications need to quantify their output uncertainty. We study regression from images to parameter values and here it is common to detect uncertainty by predicting probability distributions. In this context, we investigate the regression-by-classification paradigm which can represent multimodal distributions, without a prior assumption on the number of modes. Through experiments on a specifically designed synthetic dataset, we demonstrate that traditional loss functions lead to poor probability distribution estimates and severe overconfidence, in the absence of full ground truth distributions. In order to alleviate these issues, we propose hinge-Wasserstein -- a simple improvement of the Wasserstein loss that reduces the penalty for weak secondary modes during training. This enables prediction of complex distributions with multiple modes, and allows training on datasets where full ground truth distributions are not available. In extensive experiments, we show that the proposed loss leads to substantially better uncertainty estimation on two challenging computer vision tasks: horizon line detection and stereo disparity estimation.
6/24/2024
Quantifying Distribution Shifts and Uncertainties for Enhanced Model Robustness in Machine Learning Applications
Vegard Flovik
0
0
Distribution shifts, where statistical properties differ between training and test datasets, present a significant challenge in real-world machine learning applications where they directly impact model generalization and robustness. In this study, we explore model adaptation and generalization by utilizing synthetic data to systematically address distributional disparities. Our investigation aims to identify the prerequisites for successful model adaptation across diverse data distributions, while quantifying the associated uncertainties. Specifically, we generate synthetic data using the Van der Waals equation for gases and employ quantitative measures such as Kullback-Leibler divergence, Jensen-Shannon distance, and Mahalanobis distance to assess data similarity. These metrics en able us to evaluate both model accuracy and quantify the associated uncertainty in predictions arising from data distribution shifts. Our findings suggest that utilizing statistical measures, such as the Mahalanobis distance, to determine whether model predictions fall within the low-error interpolation regime or the high-error extrapolation regime provides a complementary method for assessing distribution shift and model uncertainty. These insights hold significant value for enhancing model robustness and generalization, essential for the successful deployment of machine learning applications in real-world scenarios.
5/6/2024