Structure learning of Hamiltonians from real-time evolution

Read original: arXiv:2405.00082 - Published 7/30/2024 by Ainesh Bakshi, Allen Liu, Ankur Moitra, Ewin Tang
Total Score

0

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The study aims to recover an unknown local Hamiltonian $H$ on $n$ qubits, given the ability to apply $e^{-\mathrm{i} Ht}$ in real-time.
  • This problem is well-studied when the interaction terms $E_a$ are known, and only the interaction strengths $\lambda_a$ are unknown.
  • The researchers present a new approach that can learn the Hamiltonian structure without prior knowledge of the interaction terms.
  • Their algorithm achieves Heisenberg-limited scaling, with the evolution time scaling linearly with the desired accuracy $\varepsilon$.
  • The algorithm has several appealing properties, including not needing to know the Hamiltonian terms, working beyond short-range settings, and achieving constant time resolution.

Plain English Explanation

In this study, the researchers are looking to recover, or figure out, an unknown Hamiltonian, which is a mathematical description of the energy of a quantum system. They have the ability to apply a specific type of quantum operation, called $e^{-\mathrm{i} Ht}$, which evolves the system according to the unknown Hamiltonian $H$.

Previous work on this problem has assumed that the researchers already know the specific interaction terms in the Hamiltonian, and they only need to figure out the strengths of those interactions. However, the researchers in this study wanted to go a step further and see if they could learn the Hamiltonian structure without any prior knowledge of the interaction terms.

The researchers present a new algorithm that can recover the Hamiltonian to a desired accuracy $\varepsilon$ with an evolution time that scales linearly with $1/\varepsilon$. This is known as Heisenberg-limited scaling, which is the best possible scaling that can be achieved.

Additionally, the algorithm has several other appealing properties:

  1. It does not need to know the Hamiltonian terms in advance.
  2. It works even when the Hamiltonian has long-range interactions, not just short-range ones.
  3. It can apply the Hamiltonian evolution in constant time increments, allowing for high-resolution measurements.

To the researchers' knowledge, no previous algorithm with Heisenberg-limited scaling had even one of these properties, let alone all three. As an application, the researchers show that they can learn Hamiltonians with power-law decay, a type of long-range interaction, more efficiently than the standard approach.

Technical Explanation

The researchers study the problem of Hamiltonian structure learning from real-time evolution. Given the ability to apply $e^{-\mathrm{i} Ht}$ for an unknown local Hamiltonian $H = \sum_{a = 1}^m \lambda_a E_a$ on $n$ qubits, the goal is to recover $H$.

This problem has been well-studied under the assumption that the interaction terms $E_a$ are known, and only the interaction strengths $\lambda_a$ are unknown. However, the researchers present a new approach that can learn the Hamiltonian structure without prior knowledge of the interaction terms.

Their algorithm achieves the gold standard of Heisenberg-limited scaling, where the evolution time scales linearly with the desired accuracy $\varepsilon$. Additionally, the algorithm has the following appealing properties:

  1. It does not need to know the Hamiltonian terms in advance.
  2. It works beyond the short-range setting, extending to any Hamiltonian $H$ where the sum of terms interacting with a qubit has bounded norm.
  3. It evolves according to $H$ in constant time $t$ increments, achieving constant time resolution.

The researchers also show that their algorithm can learn Hamiltonians exhibiting power-law decay up to accuracy $\varepsilon$ with total evolution time beating the standard limit of $1/\varepsilon^2$.

Critical Analysis

The researchers have presented a novel and impressive approach to Hamiltonian structure learning that achieves the gold standard of Heisenberg-limited scaling. Their algorithm's ability to learn the Hamiltonian structure without prior knowledge of the interaction terms is a significant advancement in the field.

However, the paper does not address the potential limitations or practical challenges of implementing this algorithm. For example, the algorithm assumes that the researchers can apply the $e^{-\mathrm{i} Ht}$ operation with high precision, which may be difficult to achieve in real-world quantum systems.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the robustness of the algorithm to noise or experimental errors. In practice, quantum systems are often subject to various sources of noise, and it would be valuable to understand how the algorithm's performance would be affected in such scenarios.

The researchers also do not provide a comparison to other state-of-the-art Hamiltonian learning algorithms, which would help assess the relative strengths and weaknesses of their approach. Comparisons to related work could highlight the unique advantages of the proposed algorithm.

Overall, the research presented in this paper is a significant contribution to the field of Hamiltonian learning, but further analysis of the algorithm's practical feasibility and robustness would strengthen the work and provide a more comprehensive understanding of its capabilities.

Conclusion

The researchers have developed a novel algorithm for learning the structure of an unknown local Hamiltonian, which operates under the challenging condition of not knowing the underlying interaction terms in advance. Their approach achieves the gold standard of Heisenberg-limited scaling, with the evolution time scaling linearly with the desired accuracy.

The algorithm also has several other appealing properties, including the ability to work beyond short-range interactions and achieve constant time resolution. These advancements represent a significant step forward in the field of Hamiltonian learning, with potential applications in areas such as quantum simulation and quantum control.

While the paper does not address practical limitations or comparisons to other state-of-the-art approaches, the researchers have presented a promising new direction for Hamiltonian structure learning that could inspire further research and development in this important area of quantum computing and physics.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Total Score

0

Structure learning of Hamiltonians from real-time evolution

Ainesh Bakshi, Allen Liu, Ankur Moitra, Ewin Tang

We study the problem of Hamiltonian structure learning from real-time evolution: given the ability to apply $e^{-mathrm{i} Ht}$ for an unknown local Hamiltonian $H = sum_{a = 1}^m lambda_a E_a$ on $n$ qubits, the goal is to recover $H$. This problem is already well-understood under the assumption that the interaction terms, $E_a$, are given, and only the interaction strengths, $lambda_a$, are unknown. But how efficiently can we learn a local Hamiltonian without prior knowledge of its interaction structure? We present a new, general approach to Hamiltonian learning that not only solves the challenging structure learning variant, but also resolves other open questions in the area, all while achieving the gold standard of Heisenberg-limited scaling. In particular, our algorithm recovers the Hamiltonian to $varepsilon$ error with total evolution time $O(log (n)/varepsilon)$, and has the following appealing properties: (1) it does not need to know the Hamiltonian terms; (2) it works beyond the short-range setting, extending to any Hamiltonian $H$ where the sum of terms interacting with a qubit has bounded norm; (3) it evolves according to $H$ in constant time $t$ increments, thus achieving constant time resolution. As an application, we can also learn Hamiltonians exhibiting power-law decay up to accuracy $varepsilon$ with total evolution time beating the standard limit of $1/varepsilon^2$.

Read more

7/30/2024

Solving The Quantum Many-Body Hamiltonian Learning Problem with Neural Differential Equations
Total Score

0

Solving The Quantum Many-Body Hamiltonian Learning Problem with Neural Differential Equations

Timothy Heightman, Edward Jiang, Antonio Ac'in

Understanding and characterising quantum many-body dynamics remains a significant challenge due to both the exponential complexity required to represent quantum many-body Hamiltonians, and the need to accurately track states in time under the action of such Hamiltonians. This inherent complexity limits our ability to characterise quantum many-body systems, highlighting the need for innovative approaches to unlock their full potential. To address this challenge, we propose a novel method to solve the Hamiltonian Learning (HL) problem-inferring quantum dynamics from many-body state trajectories-using Neural Differential Equations combined with an Ansatz Hamiltonian. Our method is reliably convergent, experimentally friendly, and interpretable, making it a stable solution for HL on a set of Hamiltonians previously unlearnable in the literature. In addition to this, we propose a new quantitative benchmark based on power laws, which can objectively compare the reliability and generalisation capabilities of any two HL algorithms. Finally, we benchmark our method against state-of-the-art HL algorithms with a 1D spin-1/2 chain proof of concept.

Read more

8/19/2024

🧪

Total Score

0

Hamiltonian Property Testing

Andreas Bluhm, Matthias C. Caro, Aadil Oufkir

Locality is a fundamental feature of many physical time evolutions. Assumptions on locality and related structural properties also underlie recently proposed procedures for learning an unknown Hamiltonian from access to the induced time evolution. However, no protocols to rigorously test whether an unknown Hamiltonian is local were known. We investigate Hamiltonian locality testing as a property testing problem, where the task is to determine whether an unknown $n$-qubit Hamiltonian $H$ is $k$-local or $varepsilon$-far from all $k$-local Hamiltonians, given access to the time evolution along $H$. First, we emphasize the importance of the chosen distance measure: With respect to the operator norm, a worst-case distance measure, incoherent quantum locality testers require $tilde{Omega}(2^n)$ many time evolution queries and an expected total evolution time of $tilde{Omega}(2^n / varepsilon)$, and even coherent testers need $Omega(2^{n/2})$ many queries and $Omega(2^{n/2}/varepsilon)$ total evolution time. In contrast, when distances are measured according to the normalized Frobenius norm, corresponding to an average-case distance, we give a sample-, time-, and computationally efficient incoherent Hamiltonian locality testing algorithm based on randomized measurements. In fact, our procedure can be used to simultaneously test a wide class of Hamiltonian properties beyond locality. Finally, we prove that learning a general Hamiltonian remains exponentially hard with this average-case distance, thereby establishing an exponential separation between Hamiltonian testing and learning. Our work initiates the study of property testing for quantum Hamiltonians, demonstrating that a broad class of Hamiltonian properties is efficiently testable even with limited quantum capabilities, and positioning Hamiltonian testing as an independent area of research alongside Hamiltonian learning.

Read more

4/10/2024

📈

Total Score

0

Simple algorithms to test and learn local Hamiltonians

Francisco Escudero Guti'errez

We consider the problems of testing and learning an $n$-qubit $k$-local Hamiltonian from queries to its evolution operator with respect the 2-norm of the Pauli spectrum, or equivalently, the normalized Frobenius norm. For testing whether a Hamiltonian is $epsilon_1$-close to $k$-local or $epsilon_2$-far from $k$-local, we show that $O(1/(epsilon_2-epsilon_1)^{8})$ queries suffice. This solves two questions posed in a recent work by Bluhm, Caro and Oufkir. For learning up to error $epsilon$, we show that $exp(O(k^2+klog(1/epsilon)))$ queries suffice. Our proofs are simple, concise and based on Pauli-analytic techniques.

Read more

4/10/2024