A study on Deep Convolutional Neural Networks, Transfer Learning and Ensemble Model for Breast Cancer Detection

Read original: arXiv:2409.06699 - Published 9/11/2024 by Md Taimur Ahad, Sumaya Mustofa, Faruk Ahmed, Yousuf Rayhan Emon, Aunirudra Dey Anu

🤿

Overview

Deep learning, transfer learning, and ensemble models have shown promise in improving computer-aided disease diagnosis.
However, applying transfer learning and ensemble models is still limited.
Significant Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (D-CNNs) have been introduced to detect and classify breast cancer, but few comparative studies have investigated the accuracy and efficiency of existing CNN architectures.

Plain English Explanation

This research paper compares the performance of different deep learning models, including the original CNN, transfer learning, and an ensemble model, in detecting and classifying breast cancer. The researchers used six CNN-based deep learning architectures: SE-ResNet152, MobileNetV2, VGG19, ResNet18, InceptionV3, and DenseNet-121.

The key findings are:

The ensemble model provided the highest detection and classification accuracy of 99.94% for breast cancer.
However, the transfer learning approach did not increase the accuracy of the original models.
The high accuracy of the CNN models suggests they are promising for breast cancer detection.

This research is significant for biomedical engineering, computer-aided disease diagnosis, and ML-based disease detection.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted a comparative study of six CNN-based deep learning architectures (SE-ResNet152, MobileNetV2, VGG19, ResNet18, InceptionV3, and DenseNet-121), a transfer learning approach, and an ensemble model for breast cancer detection and classification. They evaluated the accuracy and efficiency of these models on a breast cancer dataset.

The key findings were:

The ensemble model provided the highest detection and classification accuracy of 99.94% for breast cancer.
The transfer learning approach did not increase the accuracy of the original models.
The high accuracy of the CNN models suggests they are promising for breast cancer detection.

The researchers also noted that the ensemble model's development was ad-hoc, overlooked redundant layers, and suffered from imbalanced datasets and inadequate augmentation.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge the limitations of their study, such as the ad-hoc nature of the ensemble model development and the lack of improvement from transfer learning. They suggest that further research is needed to address these issues and explore more advanced ensemble modeling techniques.

Additionally, the researchers did not provide detailed information about the dataset used, such as its size, diversity, and potential biases. This information would be crucial for evaluating the generalizability and robustness of the models.

While the high accuracy of the CNN models is promising, the researchers should also consider evaluating the models' performance on more realistic and challenging datasets that better reflect the real-world complexity of breast cancer detection.

Conclusion

This study compares the performance of various deep learning models, including the original CNN, transfer learning, and an ensemble model, in detecting and classifying breast cancer. The key finding is that the ensemble model provided the highest detection and classification accuracy of 99.94%.

However, the researchers also found that the transfer learning approach did not improve the accuracy of the original models. This suggests that more advanced techniques may be needed to effectively leverage transfer learning for breast cancer detection.

Overall, the high accuracy of the CNN models indicates their potential for breast cancer detection and classification. This research is an important contribution to the field of biomedical engineering and computer-aided disease diagnosis.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤿

A study on Deep Convolutional Neural Networks, Transfer Learning and Ensemble Model for Breast Cancer Detection

Md Taimur Ahad, Sumaya Mustofa, Faruk Ahmed, Yousuf Rayhan Emon, Aunirudra Dey Anu

In deep learning, transfer learning and ensemble models have shown promise in improving computer-aided disease diagnosis. However, applying the transfer learning and ensemble model is still relatively limited. Moreover, the ensemble model's development is ad-hoc, overlooks redundant layers, and suffers from imbalanced datasets and inadequate augmentation. Lastly, significant Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (D-CNNs) have been introduced to detect and classify breast cancer. Still, very few comparative studies were conducted to investigate the accuracy and efficiency of existing CNN architectures. Realising the gaps, this study compares the performance of D-CNN, which includes the original CNN, transfer learning, and an ensemble model, in detecting breast cancer. The comparison study of this paper consists of comparison using six CNN-based deep learning architectures (SE-ResNet152, MobileNetV2, VGG19, ResNet18, InceptionV3, and DenseNet-121), a transfer learning, and an ensemble model on breast cancer detection. Among the comparison of these models, the ensemble model provides the highest detection and classification accuracy of 99.94% for breast cancer detection and classification. However, this study also provides a negative result in the case of transfer learning, as the transfer learning did not increase the accuracy of the original SE-ResNet152, MobileNetV2, VGG19, ResNet18, InceptionV3, and DenseNet-121 model. The high accuracy in detecting and categorising breast cancer detection using CNN suggests that the CNN model is promising in breast cancer disease detection. This research is significant in biomedical engineering, computer-aided disease diagnosis, and ML-based disease detection.

9/11/2024

🔎

A comprehensive study on Blood Cancer detection and classification using Convolutional Neural Network

Md Taimur Ahad, Sajib Bin Mamun, Sumaya Mustofa, Bo Song, Yan Li

Over the years in object detection several efficient Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) networks, such as DenseNet201, InceptionV3, ResNet152v2, SEresNet152, VGG19, Xception gained significant attention due to their performance. Moreover, CNN paradigms have expanded to transfer learning and ensemble models from original CNN architectures. Research studies suggest that transfer learning and ensemble models are capable of increasing the accuracy of deep learning (DL) models. However, very few studies have conducted comprehensive experiments utilizing these techniques in detecting and localizing blood malignancies. Realizing the gap, this study conducted three experiments; in the first experiment -- six original CNNs were used, in the second experiment -- transfer learning and, in the third experiment a novel ensemble model DIX (DenseNet201, InceptionV3, and Xception) was developed to detect and classify blood cancer. The statistical result suggests that DIX outperformed the original and transfer learning performance, providing an accuracy of 99.12%. However, this study also provides a negative result in the case of transfer learning, as the transfer learning did not increase the accuracy of the original CNNs. Like many other cancers, blood cancer diseases require timely identification for effective treatment plans and increased survival possibilities. The high accuracy in detecting and categorization blood cancer detection using CNN suggests that the CNN model is promising in blood cancer disease detection. This research is significant in the fields of biomedical engineering, computer-aided disease diagnosis, and ML-based disease detection.

9/11/2024

Comparative Analysis of Transfer Learning Models for Breast Cancer Classification

Sania Eskandari, Ali Eslamian, Qiang Cheng

The classification of histopathological images is crucial for the early and precise detection of breast cancer. This study investigates the efficiency of deep learning models in distinguishing between Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC) and non-IDC in histopathology slides. We conducted a thorough comparison examination of eight sophisticated models: ResNet-50, DenseNet-121, ResNeXt-50, Vision Transformer (ViT), GoogLeNet (Inception v3), EfficientNet, MobileNet, and SqueezeNet. This analysis was carried out using a large dataset of 277,524 image patches. Our research makes a substantial contribution to the field by offering a comprehensive assessment of the performance of each model. We particularly highlight the exceptional efficacy of attention-based mechanisms in the ViT model, which achieved a remarkable validation accuracy of 93%, surpassing conventional convolutional networks. This study highlights the promise of advanced machine learning approaches in clinical settings, offering improved precision as well as efficiency in breast cancer diagnosis.

9/2/2024

🧠

Using convolutional neural networks for the classification of breast cancer images

Eric Bonnet

An important part of breast cancer staging is the assessment of the sentinel axillary node for early signs of tumor spreading. However, this assessment by pathologists is not always easy and retrospective surveys often requalify the status of a high proportion of sentinel nodes. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are a class of deep learning algorithms that have shown excellent performances in the most challenging visual classification tasks, with numerous applications in medical imaging. In this study I compare twelve different CNNs and different hardware acceleration devices for the detection of breast cancer from microscopic images of breast cancer tissue. Convolutional models are trained and tested on two public datasets. The first one is composed of more than 300,000 images of sentinel lymph node tissue from breast cancer patients, while the second one has more than 220,000 images from inductive breast carcinoma tissue, one of the most common forms of breast cancer. Four different hardware acceleration cards were used, with an off-the-shelf deep learning framework. The impact of transfer learning and hyperparameters fine-tuning are tested. Hardware acceleration device performance can improve training time by a factor of five to twelve, depending on the model used. On the other hand, increasing convolutional depth will augment the training time by a factor of four to six times, depending on the acceleration device used. Increasing the depth and the complexity of the model generally improves performance, but the relationship is not linear and also depends on the architecture of the model. The performance of transfer learning is always worse compared to a complete retraining of the model. Fine-tuning the hyperparameters of the model improves the results, with the best model showing a performance comparable to state-of-the-art models.

4/30/2024