Super-intelligent society for the silver segment: Ethics in design

Read original: arXiv:2408.15618 - Published 8/30/2024 by Jaana Leikas, Rebekah Rousi, Hannu Vilpponen, Pertti Saariluoma
Total Score

0

📉

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper discusses the importance of creating an inclusive, ethical, and accessible digital society that benefits all members of society, including older adults.
  • It highlights the challenges faced by older adults in using digital technology and the need to keep them actively involved as users of digital services.
  • The paper calls for action-oriented design thinking that focuses on improving the quality of life, with an emphasis on ethical design and impact assessment.

Plain English Explanation

The paper argues that as technology becomes more advanced, it's crucial that the digital society is designed to be inclusive and beneficial for everyone, including older adults. Many older people are struggling to keep up with the rapid changes in digital technology, and this is negatively impacting their quality of life. The paper calls for designing digital services and technologies in a way that makes them more accessible and user-friendly for older adults, so they can actively participate in and contribute to the digital society.

The key idea is that a super-intelligent, AI-enabled society should be built with a focus on inclusion and ethical considerations, ensuring that all members of society can equally benefit from the possibilities offered by new technologies. This will require a thoughtful, action-oriented design approach that prioritizes improving the quality of life for everyone, not just the tech-savvy.

Technical Explanation

The paper emphasizes the need for an inclusive, ethical, and accessible digital society as advanced AI technologies become more prevalent. It highlights the challenges faced by older adults, who often struggle to use digital technologies, and argues that this "silver segment" of the population should be kept actively involved as users of digital services.

To address this issue, the paper calls for action-oriented design thinking that focuses on improving the quality of life, with a strong emphasis on ethical design and impact assessment. This approach aims to ensure that the development and implementation of AI-enabled technologies consider the needs and challenges of all members of society, not just the tech-savvy.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case for the importance of creating an inclusive digital society that benefits all members of the population, including older adults. However, it does not provide specific details on how this can be achieved in practice. The paper could have delved deeper into the specific design principles, user research methods, and evaluation criteria that should be employed to ensure ethical and accessible digital services.

Additionally, the paper does not address potential barriers or challenges that may arise in implementing this vision, such as the cost implications, the need for widespread adoption, or the potential resistance from tech companies or policymakers. A more comprehensive discussion of these issues could have strengthened the paper's overall impact and practical relevance.

Conclusion

In summary, the paper highlights the critical need for an inclusive, ethical, and accessible digital society that considers the needs of all members of society, including older adults. By adopting a design approach that prioritizes improving the quality of life and conducting rigorous ethical assessments, the paper argues that we can create a super-intelligent, AI-enabled society that truly benefits everyone. While the paper could have delved deeper into the practical implementation details, its core message is an important one that deserves serious consideration as we continue to navigate the rapidly evolving digital landscape.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📉

Total Score

0

Super-intelligent society for the silver segment: Ethics in design

Jaana Leikas, Rebekah Rousi, Hannu Vilpponen, Pertti Saariluoma

A super-intelligent AI- society should be based on inclusion, so that all members of society can equally benefit from the possibilities new technologies offer in everyday life. At present, the digital society is overwhelming many people, a large group of whom are older adults, whose quality of life has been undermined in many respects by their difficulties in using digital technology. However, this silver segment should be kept involved as active users of digital services and contribute to the functioning and development of a super-intelligent, AI-enabled society. The paper calls for action-oriented design thinking that considers the challenge to improve the quality of life, with an emphasis on ethical design and ethical impact assessment.

Read more

8/30/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Societal Adaptation to Advanced AI

Jamie Bernardi, Gabriel Mukobi, Hilary Greaves, Lennart Heim, Markus Anderljung

Existing strategies for managing risks from advanced AI systems often focus on affecting what AI systems are developed and how they diffuse. However, this approach becomes less feasible as the number of developers of advanced AI grows, and impedes beneficial use-cases as well as harmful ones. In response, we urge a complementary approach: increasing societal adaptation to advanced AI, that is, reducing the expected negative impacts from a given level of diffusion of a given AI capability. We introduce a conceptual framework which helps identify adaptive interventions that avoid, defend against and remedy potentially harmful uses of AI systems, illustrated with examples in election manipulation, cyberterrorism, and loss of control to AI decision-makers. We discuss a three-step cycle that society can implement to adapt to AI. Increasing society's ability to implement this cycle builds its resilience to advanced AI. We conclude with concrete recommendations for governments, industry, and third-parties.

Read more

5/17/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistants

Iason Gabriel, Arianna Manzini, Geoff Keeling, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Verena Rieser, Hasan Iqbal, Nenad Tomav{s}ev, Ira Ktena, Zachary Kenton, Mikel Rodriguez, Seliem El-Sayed, Sasha Brown, Canfer Akbulut, Andrew Trask, Edward Hughes, A. Stevie Bergman, Renee Shelby, Nahema Marchal, Conor Griffin, Juan Mateos-Garcia, Laura Weidinger, Winnie Street, Benjamin Lange, Alex Ingerman, Alison Lentz, Reed Enger, Andrew Barakat, Victoria Krakovna, John Oliver Siy, Zeb Kurth-Nelson, Amanda McCroskery, Vijay Bolina, Harry Law, Murray Shanahan, Lize Alberts, Borja Balle, Sarah de Haas, Yetunde Ibitoye, Allan Dafoe, Beth Goldberg, S'ebastien Krier, Alexander Reese, Sims Witherspoon, Will Hawkins, Maribeth Rauh, Don Wallace, Matija Franklin, Josh A. Goldstein, Joel Lehman, Michael Klenk, Shannon Vallor, Courtney Biles, Meredith Ringel Morris, Helen King, Blaise Aguera y Arcas, William Isaac, James Manyika

This paper focuses on the opportunities and the ethical and societal risks posed by advanced AI assistants. We define advanced AI assistants as artificial agents with natural language interfaces, whose function is to plan and execute sequences of actions on behalf of a user, across one or more domains, in line with the user's expectations. The paper starts by considering the technology itself, providing an overview of AI assistants, their technical foundations and potential range of applications. It then explores questions around AI value alignment, well-being, safety and malicious uses. Extending the circle of inquiry further, we next consider the relationship between advanced AI assistants and individual users in more detail, exploring topics such as manipulation and persuasion, anthropomorphism, appropriate relationships, trust and privacy. With this analysis in place, we consider the deployment of advanced assistants at a societal scale, focusing on cooperation, equity and access, misinformation, economic impact, the environment and how best to evaluate advanced AI assistants. Finally, we conclude by providing a range of recommendations for researchers, developers, policymakers and public stakeholders.

Read more

4/30/2024

Social Environment Design
Total Score

0

Social Environment Design

Edwin Zhang, Sadie Zhao, Tonghan Wang, Safwan Hossain, Henry Gasztowtt, Stephan Zheng, David C. Parkes, Milind Tambe, Yiling Chen

Artificial Intelligence (AI) holds promise as a technology that can be used to improve government and economic policy-making. This paper proposes a new research agenda towards this end by introducing Social Environment Design, a general framework for the use of AI for automated policy-making that connects with the Reinforcement Learning, EconCS, and Computational Social Choice communities. The framework seeks to capture general economic environments, includes voting on policy objectives, and gives a direction for the systematic analysis of government and economic policy through AI simulation. We highlight key open problems for future research in AI-based policy-making. By solving these challenges, we hope to achieve various social welfare objectives, thereby promoting more ethical and responsible decision making.

Read more

6/18/2024