A Survey on Adversarial Contention Resolution

Read original: arXiv:2403.03876 - Published 7/8/2024 by Ioana Banicescu, Trisha Chakraborty, Seth Gilbert, Maxwell Young
Total Score

0

A Survey on Adversarial Contention Resolution

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper provides a comprehensive survey of research on adversarial contention resolution, which involves algorithms and techniques for managing conflicts and collisions in shared communication channels.
  • Key topics covered include contention resolution, backoff algorithms, the wakeup problem, the selection problem, multiple access channels, broadcast algorithms, stability, queuing theory, and adversarial queuing theory.
  • The survey examines the theoretical foundations and practical applications of these concepts, with a focus on analyzing the performance and behavior of various algorithms and approaches in adversarial settings.

Plain English Explanation

Imagine you're in a crowded room, and everyone needs to use the same microphone to speak. This paper looks at the different strategies and algorithms that can be used to manage this kind of "contention" or competition for a shared resource.

For example, one approach is a "backoff" algorithm, where people take turns trying to use the microphone, waiting for a random amount of time before making another attempt. This helps prevent everyone from trying to speak at once and creating a mess of overlapping voices.

The "wakeup problem" refers to the challenge of coordinating when people can start trying to access the microphone, while the "selection problem" is about figuring out whose turn it is to use the mic. The paper examines how these problems can be tackled using various algorithms and techniques.

It also looks at how these concepts apply to more complex "multiple access channels," where there are multiple communication channels that people need to share, and broadcast algorithms that allow information to be transmitted to multiple people at once.

Importantly, the paper focuses on "adversarial" settings, where there may be malicious actors trying to disrupt the system or game the rules. It applies tools from queuing theory and adversarial queuing theory to analyze the stability and performance of various algorithms in these challenging environments.

Technical Explanation

The paper provides a comprehensive survey of research on adversarial contention resolution, covering a range of related topics and concepts. It begins by defining key terms and outlining the various models, metrics, and algorithm design principles that are relevant to this field.

One major focus is on backoff algorithms, which are a common approach for managing conflicts in shared communication channels. The paper examines the theoretical foundations of these algorithms, as well as their behavior and performance in both benign and adversarial settings. It also delves into the wakeup problem and selection problem, which are fundamental challenges in contention resolution.

The survey then explores the application of these ideas to more complex scenarios, such as multiple access channels and broadcast algorithms. It analyzes the stability and resilience of different approaches, drawing on tools from queuing theory and adversarial queuing theory.

Throughout the paper, the authors highlight key insights, design principles, and open challenges that have emerged from the research on adversarial contention resolution. They provide a comprehensive and well-structured overview of this important area of study.

Critical Analysis

The paper offers a thorough and well-researched survey of the field of adversarial contention resolution, covering a wide range of relevant topics and concepts. The authors demonstrate a deep understanding of the theoretical foundations and practical implications of this area of study.

One potential limitation of the paper is that it may be quite dense and technical for readers who are not already familiar with the subject matter. While the authors do a commendable job of defining key terms and explaining the core ideas, some of the more advanced mathematical and theoretical concepts may still prove challenging for a general audience.

Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on the theoretical and algorithmic aspects of adversarial contention resolution, with less emphasis on real-world applications and implementation challenges. It would be interesting to see the authors explore how these techniques are being applied in practice, and the various practical and operational considerations that arise.

Overall, the paper is a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners working in the fields of communication systems, network protocols, and algorithm design. It provides a comprehensive and insightful survey of the current state of the art in adversarial contention resolution, and offers a solid foundation for further exploration and development in this important area.

Conclusion

This paper offers a thorough and well-researched survey of the field of adversarial contention resolution, covering a wide range of related topics and concepts. It delves into the theoretical foundations and practical applications of techniques like backoff algorithms, the wakeup problem, the selection problem, multiple access channels, broadcast algorithms, and the use of queuing theory and adversarial queuing theory to analyze the stability and performance of these approaches.

By providing a comprehensive overview of the current state of the art in this field, the paper serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners working on communication systems, network protocols, and algorithm design. While the technical nature of the content may present some challenges for a general audience, the authors do a commendable job of explaining the core ideas and highlighting the key insights and open challenges that have emerged from this important area of study.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

A Survey on Adversarial Contention Resolution
Total Score

0

A Survey on Adversarial Contention Resolution

Ioana Banicescu, Trisha Chakraborty, Seth Gilbert, Maxwell Young

Contention resolution addresses the challenge of coordinating access by multiple processes to a shared resource such as memory, disk storage, or a communication channel. Originally spurred by challenges in database systems and bus networks, contention resolution has endured as an important abstraction for resource sharing, despite decades of technological change. Here, we survey the literature on resolving worst-case contention, where the number of processes and the time at which each process may start seeking access to the resource is dictated by an adversary. We highlight the evolution of contention resolution, where new concerns -- such as security, quality of service, and energy efficiency -- are motivated by modern systems. These efforts have yielded insights into the limits of randomized and deterministic approaches, as well as the impact of different model assumptions such as global clock synchronization, knowledge of the number of processors, feedback from access attempts, and attacks on the availability of the shared resource.

Read more

7/8/2024

Softening the Impact of Collisions in Contention Resolution
Total Score

0

Softening the Impact of Collisions in Contention Resolution

Umesh Biswas, Trisha Chakraborty, Maxwell Young

Contention resolution addresses the problem of coordinating access to a shared communication channel. Time is discretized into synchronized slots, and a packet can be sent in any slot. If no packet is sent, then the slot is empty; if a single packet is sent, then it is successful; and when multiple packets are sent at the same time, a collision occurs, resulting in the failure of the corresponding transmissions. In each slot, every packet receives ternary channel feedback indicating whether the current slot is empty, successful, or a collision. Much of the prior work on contention resolution has focused on optimizing the makespan, which is the number of slots required for all packets to succeed. However, in many modern systems, collisions are also costly in terms of the time they incur, which existing contention-resolution algorithms do not address. In this paper, we design and analyze a randomized algorithm, Collision Aversion Backoff (CAB), that optimizes both the makespan and the collision cost. We consider the static case where an unknown $ngeq 2$ packets are initially present in the system, and each collision has a known cost $mathcal{C}$, where $1 leq mathcal{C} leq n^{kappa}$ for a known constant $kappageq 0$. With error probability polynomially small in $n$, CAB guarantees that all packets succeed with makespan and a total expected collision cost of $tilde{O}(nsqrt{mathcal{C}})$. We give a lower bound for the class of fair algorithms: where, in each slot, every packet executing the fair algorithm sends with the same probability (and the probability may change from slot to slot). Our lower bound is asymptotically tight up to a $texttt{poly}(log n)$-factor for sufficiently large $mathcal{C}$.

Read more

8/22/2024

↗️

Total Score

0

On (Random-order) Online Contention Resolution Schemes for the Matching Polytope of (Bipartite) Graphs

Calum MacRury, Will Ma, Nathaniel Grammel

Online Contention Resolution Schemes (OCRS's) represent a modern tool for selecting a subset of elements, subject to resource constraints, when the elements are presented to the algorithm sequentially. OCRS's have led to some of the best-known competitive ratio guarantees for online resource allocation problems, with the added benefit of treating different online decisions -- accept/reject, probing, pricing -- in a unified manner. This paper analyzes OCRS's for resource constraints defined by matchings in graphs, a fundamental structure in combinatorial optimization. We consider two dimensions of variants: the elements being presented in adversarial or random order; and the graph being bipartite or general. We improve the state of the art for all combinations of variants, both in terms of algorithmic guarantees and impossibility results. Some of our algorithmic guarantees are best-known even compared to Contention Resolution Schemes that can choose the order of arrival or are offline. All in all, our results for OCRS directly improve the best-known competitive ratios for online accept/reject, probing, and pricing problems on graphs in a unified manner.

Read more

4/3/2024

🗣️

Total Score

0

Existence and Verification of Nash Equilibria in Non-Cooperative Contribution Games with Resource Contention

Nicolas Troquard

In resource contribution games, a class of non-cooperative games, the players want to obtain a bundle of resources and are endowed with bags of bundles of resources that they can make available into a common for all to enjoy. Available resources can then be used towards their private goals. A player is potentially satisfied with a profile of contributed resources when his bundle could be extracted from the contributed resources. Resource contention occurs when the players who are potentially satisfied, cannot actually all obtain their bundle. The player's preferences are always single-minded (they consider a profile good or they do not) and parsimonious (between two profiles that are equally good, they prefer the profile where they contribute less). What makes a profile of contributed resources good for a player depends on their attitude towards resource contention. We study the problem of deciding whether an outcome is a pure Nash equilibrium for three kinds of players' attitudes towards resource contention: public contention-aversity, private contention-aversity, and contention-tolerance. In particular, we demonstrate that in the general case when the players are contention-averse, then the problem is harder than when they are contention-tolerant. We then identify a natural class of games where, in presence of contention-averse preferences, it becomes tractable, and where there is always a Nash equilibrium.

Read more

4/1/2024