A Survey on Knowledge Organization Systems of Research Fields: Resources and Challenges
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides a comprehensive survey of knowledge organization systems (KOS) used in various research fields.
- It explores the resources and challenges associated with developing and maintaining KOS for research.
- The paper covers topics such as the purpose of KOS, different types of KOS, and the role of KOS in research workflows.
Plain English Explanation
Knowledge organization systems (KOS) are tools that help researchers and others make sense of the vast amount of information in a particular field. They provide a structured way to categorize, classify, and connect different concepts, ideas, and research findings.
The paper examines the various types of KOS used across different research disciplines, such as taxonomies, thesauri, and ontologies. It discusses the benefits of using KOS, such as improved information retrieval, knowledge sharing, and interdisciplinary collaboration.
The paper also explores the challenges associated with developing and maintaining KOS, such as the need for domain expertise, the complexities of representing diverse knowledge, and the difficulties of keeping KOS up-to-date with the rapidly evolving nature of research. It highlights the importance of involving stakeholders, such as researchers and librarians, in the KOS development process.
Technical Explanation
The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the various types of knowledge organization systems (KOS) used in research, including taxonomies, thesauri, and ontologies. It examines the purpose and benefits of KOS, such as facilitating information retrieval, enabling knowledge sharing, and supporting interdisciplinary collaboration.
The paper discusses the key elements of KOS, including their structure, content, and underlying principles. It highlights the role of KOS in research workflows, such as literature search, data analysis, and the dissemination of research findings.
The paper also delves into the challenges associated with developing and maintaining KOS for research fields. These challenges include the need for domain expertise, the complexities of representing diverse and evolving knowledge, and the difficulties of keeping KOS up-to-date. The paper emphasizes the importance of involving stakeholders, such as researchers and librarians, in the KOS development process to ensure their relevance and usability.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-researched overview of the KOS landscape in research, addressing both the benefits and the challenges associated with these systems. However, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific methodologies or techniques used in the development and maintenance of KOS, which could be a valuable area for further exploration.
Additionally, the paper could have addressed the potential biases and limitations inherent in KOS, such as the influence of the perspectives and backgrounds of the individuals or organizations involved in their creation. This could help readers understand the need for continuous evaluation and improvement of KOS to ensure they accurately represent the diverse and evolving nature of research.
Furthermore, the paper could have discussed the implications of the increasing use of machine learning and artificial intelligence in the development and management of KOS, and the potential opportunities and challenges this presents for the research community.
Conclusion
This survey paper provides a comprehensive overview of the role and importance of knowledge organization systems (KOS) in research. It highlights the various types of KOS, their benefits, and the challenges associated with their development and maintenance.
The paper emphasizes the crucial role of KOS in facilitating information retrieval, knowledge sharing, and interdisciplinary collaboration within the research community. It also underscores the need for domain expertise, stakeholder involvement, and continuous improvement to ensure the relevance and utility of KOS in the rapidly evolving research landscape.
By addressing the resources and challenges of KOS, this paper offers valuable insights for researchers, librarians, and information professionals who are responsible for organizing and managing the vast amount of knowledge generated in their respective fields.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A Survey on Knowledge Organization Systems of Research Fields: Resources and Challenges
Angelo Salatino, Tanay Aggarwal, Andrea Mannocci, Francesco Osborne, Enrico Motta
Knowledge Organization Systems (KOSs), such as term lists, thesauri, taxonomies, and ontologies, play a fundamental role in categorising, managing, and retrieving information. In the academic domain, KOSs are often adopted for representing research areas and their relationships, primarily aiming to classify research articles, academic courses, patents, books, scientific venues, domain experts, grants, software, experiment materials, and several other relevant products and agents. These structured representations of research areas, widely embraced by many academic fields, have proven effective in empowering AI-based systems to i) enhance retrievability of relevant documents, ii) enable advanced analytic solutions to quantify the impact of academic research, and iii) analyse and forecast research dynamics. This paper aims to present a comprehensive survey of the current KOS for academic disciplines. We analysed and compared 45 KOSs according to five main dimensions: scope, structure, curation, usage, and links to other KOSs. Our results reveal a very heterogeneous scenario in terms of scope, scale, quality, and usage, highlighting the need for more integrated solutions for representing research knowledge across academic fields. We conclude by discussing the main challenges and the most promising future directions.
Read more9/9/2024
0
Hierarchical Tree-structured Knowledge Graph For Academic Insight Survey
Jinghong Li, Huy Phan, Wen Gu, Koichi Ota, Shinobu Hasegawa
Research surveys have always posed a challenge for beginner researchers who lack of research training. These researchers struggle to understand the directions within their research topic, and the discovery of new research findings within a short time. One way to provide intuitive assistance to beginner researchers is by offering relevant knowledge graphs(KG) and recommending related academic papers. However, existing navigation knowledge graphs primarily rely on keywords in the research field and often fail to present the logical hierarchy among multiple related papers clearly. Moreover, most recommendation systems for academic papers simply rely on high text similarity, which can leave researchers confused as to why a particular article is being recommended. They may lack of grasp important information about the insight connection between Issue resolved and Issue finding that they hope to obtain. To address these issues, this study aims to support research insight surveys for beginner researchers by establishing a hierarchical tree-structured knowledge graph that reflects the inheritance insight of research topics and the relevance insight among the academic papers.
Read more7/8/2024
0
Uncertainty Management in the Construction of Knowledge Graphs: a Survey
Lucas Jarnac, Yoan Chabot, Miguel Couceiro
Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are a major asset for companies thanks to their great flexibility in data representation and their numerous applications, e.g., vocabulary sharing, Q/A or recommendation systems. To build a KG it is a common practice to rely on automatic methods for extracting knowledge from various heterogeneous sources. But in a noisy and uncertain world, knowledge may not be reliable and conflicts between data sources may occur. Integrating unreliable data would directly impact the use of the KG, therefore such conflicts must be resolved. This could be done manually by selecting the best data to integrate. This first approach is highly accurate, but costly and time-consuming. That is why recent efforts focus on automatic approaches, which represents a challenging task since it requires handling the uncertainty of extracted knowledge throughout its integration into the KG. We survey state-of-the-art approaches in this direction and present constructions of both open and enterprise KGs and how their quality is maintained. We then describe different knowledge extraction methods, introducing additional uncertainty. We also discuss downstream tasks after knowledge acquisition, including KG completion using embedding models, knowledge alignment, and knowledge fusion in order to address the problem of knowledge uncertainty in KG construction. We conclude with a discussion on the remaining challenges and perspectives when constructing a KG taking into account uncertainty.
Read more7/22/2024
0
The Ontoverse: Democratising Access to Knowledge Graph-based Data Through a Cartographic Interface
Johannes Zimmermann, Dariusz Wiktorek, Thomas Meusburger, Miquel Monge-Dalmau, Antonio Fabregat, Alexander Jarasch, Gunter Schmidt, Jorge S. Reis-Filho, T. Ian Simpson
As the number of scientific publications and preprints is growing exponentially, several attempts have been made to navigate this complex and increasingly detailed landscape. These have almost exclusively taken unsupervised approaches that fail to incorporate domain knowledge and lack the structural organisation required for intuitive interactive human exploration and discovery. Especially in highly interdisciplinary fields, a deep understanding of the connectedness of research works across topics is essential for generating insights. We have developed a unique approach to data navigation that leans on geographical visualisation and uses hierarchically structured domain knowledge to enable end-users to explore knowledge spaces grounded in their desired domains of interest. This can take advantage of existing ontologies, proprietary intelligence schemata, or be directly derived from the underlying data through hierarchical topic modelling. Our approach uses natural language processing techniques to extract named entities from the underlying data and normalise them against relevant domain references and navigational structures. The knowledge is integrated by first calculating similarities between entities based on their shared extracted feature space and then by alignment to the navigational structures. The result is a knowledge graph that allows for full text and semantic graph query and structured topic driven navigation. This allows end-users to identify entities relevant to their needs and access extensive graph analytics. The user interface facilitates graphical interaction with the underlying knowledge graph and mimics a cartographic map to maximise ease of use and widen adoption. We demonstrate an exemplar project using our generalisable and scalable infrastructure for an academic biomedical literature corpus that is grounded against hundreds of different named domain entities.
Read more8/9/2024