A Survey of Large Language Models for European Languages
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides a comprehensive survey of large language models (LLMs) developed for European languages.
- It examines the capabilities, limitations, and recent advancements in LLMs for various European languages.
- The authors aim to offer insights into the state of the art in LLM research and development for the European language landscape.
Plain English Explanation
The paper investigates the current state of large language models that have been created for European languages. These models are powerful artificial intelligence systems that can understand and generate human-like text in various languages.
The authors explore the capabilities of these models, such as their ability to perform tasks like translation and summarization. They also discuss the limitations and challenges that researchers face when developing LLMs for European languages, which can be more complex and diverse compared to some other language groups.
The goal of the paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of LLM technology for European languages, helping researchers, policymakers, and the general public better understand the capabilities and limitations of these systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by introducing the concept of large language models (LLMs), which are AI systems trained on vast amounts of text data to understand and generate human-like language. The authors then focus on the development of LLMs for European languages, examining the unique challenges and recent advancements in this area.
The paper explores various LLM architectures and training approaches that have been used for European languages, including transformer-based models and unsupervised pre-training techniques. It also discusses the performance of these models on a range of language tasks, such as machine translation, text generation, and natural language understanding.
The paper also highlights the unique challenges associated with developing LLMs for European languages, including the linguistic diversity, morphological complexity, and the availability of high-quality training data. The authors discuss how researchers have addressed these challenges through innovative model architectures, multilingual training strategies, and the creation of specialized language resources.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and well-researched overview of the state of the art in LLM development for European languages. The authors have done an excellent job of synthesizing the existing literature and highlighting the key trends, challenges, and opportunities in this field.
One potential limitation of the paper is that it focuses primarily on the technical aspects of LLM development, without delving too deeply into the societal and ethical implications of these technologies. As LLMs become more widely deployed, it will be important to consider issues such as bias, fairness, and privacy.
Additionally, the paper could have benefited from a more critical analysis of the limitations and potential downsides of current LLM approaches for European languages. For example, the authors could have explored the tradeoffs between model performance and multilingual support or the challenges in adapting LLMs to low-resource languages.
Nevertheless, the paper provides a valuable resource for researchers, policymakers, and the general public interested in understanding the current state of LLM technology for European languages. It serves as a solid foundation for further research and discussion in this rapidly evolving field.
Conclusion
This paper offers a comprehensive survey of the development of large language models (LLMs) for European languages. It examines the capabilities, limitations, and recent advancements in this field, providing valuable insights into the state of the art in LLM research and development.
The authors have done an excellent job of synthesizing the existing literature and highlighting the key trends, challenges, and opportunities in LLM development for European languages. While the paper could have benefited from a more critical analysis of the societal and ethical implications of these technologies, it nevertheless serves as a valuable resource for researchers, policymakers, and the general public interested in understanding the current state of this rapidly evolving field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A Survey of Large Language Models for European Languages
Wazir Ali, Sampo Pyysalo
Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained significant attention due to their high performance on a wide range of natural language tasks since the release of ChatGPT. The LLMs learn to understand and generate language by training billions of model parameters on vast volumes of text data. Despite being a relatively new field, LLM research is rapidly advancing in various directions. In this paper, we present an overview of LLM families, including LLaMA, PaLM, GPT, and MoE, and the methods developed to create and enhance LLMs for official European Union (EU) languages. We provide a comprehensive summary of common monolingual and multilingual datasets used for pretraining large language models.
Read more8/29/2024
0
Multilingual Large Language Models and Curse of Multilinguality
Daniil Gurgurov, Tanja Baumel, Tatiana Anikina
Multilingual Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained large popularity among Natural Language Processing (NLP) researchers and practitioners. These models, trained on huge datasets, show proficiency across various languages and demonstrate effectiveness in numerous downstream tasks. This paper navigates the landscape of multilingual LLMs, providing an introductory overview of their technical aspects. It explains underlying architectures, objective functions, pre-training data sources, and tokenization methods. This work explores the unique features of different model types: encoder-only (mBERT, XLM-R), decoder-only (XGLM, PALM, BLOOM, GPT-3), and encoder-decoder models (mT5, mBART). Additionally, it addresses one of the significant limitations of multilingual LLMs - the curse of multilinguality - and discusses current attempts to overcome it.
Read more6/18/2024
💬
0
Multilingual Machine Translation with Large Language Models: Empirical Results and Analysis
Wenhao Zhu, Hongyi Liu, Qingxiu Dong, Jingjing Xu, Shujian Huang, Lingpeng Kong, Jiajun Chen, Lei Li
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in handling multilingual machine translation (MMT). In this paper, we systematically investigate the advantages and challenges of LLMs for MMT by answering two questions: 1) How well do LLMs perform in translating massive languages? 2) Which factors affect LLMs' performance in translation? We thoroughly evaluate eight popular LLMs, including ChatGPT and GPT-4. Our empirical results show that translation capabilities of LLMs are continually involving. GPT-4 has beat the strong supervised baseline NLLB in 40.91% of translation directions but still faces a large gap towards the commercial translation system like Google Translate, especially on low-resource languages. Through further analysis, we discover that LLMs exhibit new working patterns when used for MMT. First, LLM can acquire translation ability in a resource-efficient way and generate moderate translation even on zero-resource languages. Second, instruction semantics can surprisingly be ignored when given in-context exemplars. Third, cross-lingual exemplars can provide better task guidance for low-resource translation than exemplars in the same language pairs. Code will be released at: https://github.com/NJUNLP/MMT-LLM.
Read more6/17/2024
💬
0
How good are Large Language Models on African Languages?
Jessica Ojo, Kelechi Ogueji, Pontus Stenetorp, David Ifeoluwa Adelani
Recent advancements in natural language processing have led to the proliferation of large language models (LLMs). These models have been shown to yield good performance, using in-context learning, even on tasks and languages they are not trained on. However, their performance on African languages is largely understudied relative to high-resource languages. We present an analysis of four popular large language models (mT0, Aya, LLaMa 2, and GPT-4) on six tasks (topic classification, sentiment classification, machine translation, summarization, question answering, and named entity recognition) across 60 African languages, spanning different language families and geographical regions. Our results suggest that all LLMs produce lower performance for African languages, and there is a large gap in performance compared to high-resource languages (such as English) for most tasks. We find that GPT-4 has an average to good performance on classification tasks, yet its performance on generative tasks such as machine translation and summarization is significantly lacking. Surprisingly, we find that mT0 had the best overall performance for cross-lingual QA, better than the state-of-the-art supervised model (i.e. fine-tuned mT5) and GPT-4 on African languages. Similarly, we find the recent Aya model to have comparable result to mT0 in almost all tasks except for topic classification where it outperform mT0. Overall, LLaMa 2 showed the worst performance, which we believe is due to its English and code-centric~(around 98%) pre-training corpus. Our findings confirms that performance on African languages continues to remain a hurdle for the current LLMs, underscoring the need for additional efforts to close this gap.
Read more5/1/2024