Synthetic Human Memories: AI-Edited Images and Videos Can Implant False Memories and Distort Recollection

Read original: arXiv:2409.08895 - Published 9/16/2024 by Pat Pataranutaporn, Chayapatr Archiwaranguprok, Samantha W. T. Chan, Elizabeth Loftus, Pattie Maes
Total Score

0

Synthetic Human Memories: AI-Edited Images and Videos Can Implant False Memories and Distort Recollection

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • AI-edited images and videos can implant false memories and distort recollection
  • The paper examines how synthetic media can impact human memory and perception
  • Experiments show AI-generated content can lead people to believe in events that never happened

Plain English Explanation

The research paper investigates how AI-edited images and videos can influence human memory and distort recollection. Experiments found that exposure to synthetic media, such as AI-generated photos or videos, can cause people to develop false memories and believe in events that never actually occurred.

This is significant because as AI technology advances, it becomes increasingly easy to create highly realistic digital content that can be difficult to distinguish from reality. If people start to confuse these AI-edited images and videos with actual memories, it could have serious implications for how we perceive the world around us and make decisions.

The researchers explore how this "synthetic human memory" phenomenon works and the potential impacts on areas like eyewitness testimony, historical narratives, and personal recollection. By understanding the cognitive effects of synthetic media, we can work to mitigate the risks and ensure AI is used responsibly.

Technical Explanation

The paper Synthetic Human Memories: AI-Edited Images and Videos Can Implant False Memories and Distort Recollection examines how AI-generated content can shape and distort human memory and perception. Through a series of experiments, the researchers demonstrate that exposing participants to AI-edited images and videos can lead them to develop false memories and beliefs about events that never actually occurred.

The researchers used state-of-the-art generative AI models to create synthetic media, including photos and videos, and then presented this content to study participants. They found that even when participants were aware the media was AI-generated, a significant portion still reported having memories or beliefs about the events depicted, as if the synthetic content had become part of their personal recollection.

Further experiments explored factors like the level of visual realism, narrative context, and individual differences in susceptibility to these false memories. The results suggest that AI-edited content can have a powerful influence on human cognition, blurring the lines between simulation and reality in ways that raise important ethical and practical concerns.

Critical Analysis

The research provides valuable insights into how advanced AI capabilities, particularly in areas like computer vision and generative modeling, can interact with human psychology and cognitive processes in complex ways. The findings highlight the need to carefully consider the societal implications of synthetic media as this technology becomes more widespread and accessible.

One potential limitation is that the experiments were conducted in controlled lab settings, and it's unclear how the effects might scale or manifest in real-world scenarios with more contextual factors at play. Additionally, the paper does not explore potential interventions or mitigation strategies to help people better recognize and resist the influence of AI-edited content.

Further research could investigate long-term impacts, individual differences in susceptibility, and ways to develop more robust cognitive defenses against the distorting effects of synthetic media. As AI continues to advance, it will be crucial to understand and address the risks of this "synthetic human memory" phenomenon to protect the integrity of human recollection and decision-making.

Conclusion

This research paper highlights a concerning potential consequence of AI-generated content: the ability to implant false memories and distort human recollection. Experiments demonstrated that exposure to AI-edited images and videos can lead people to develop beliefs about events that never actually occurred, blurring the lines between simulation and reality.

As generative AI capabilities advance, it will be essential to understand and mitigate the cognitive and societal risks associated with synthetic media. By exploring this "synthetic human memory" phenomenon, the researchers have shed light on an important challenge that must be addressed to ensure AI is developed and deployed responsibly. Continued study and the development of strategies to help people recognize and resist the influence of AI-edited content will be crucial going forward.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Synthetic Human Memories: AI-Edited Images and Videos Can Implant False Memories and Distort Recollection
Total Score

0

New!Synthetic Human Memories: AI-Edited Images and Videos Can Implant False Memories and Distort Recollection

Pat Pataranutaporn, Chayapatr Archiwaranguprok, Samantha W. T. Chan, Elizabeth Loftus, Pattie Maes

AI is increasingly used to enhance images and videos, both intentionally and unintentionally. As AI editing tools become more integrated into smartphones, users can modify or animate photos into realistic videos. This study examines the impact of AI-altered visuals on false memories--recollections of events that didn't occur or deviate from reality. In a pre-registered study, 200 participants were divided into four conditions of 50 each. Participants viewed original images, completed a filler task, then saw stimuli corresponding to their assigned condition: unedited images, AI-edited images, AI-generated videos, or AI-generated videos of AI-edited images. AI-edited visuals significantly increased false recollections, with AI-generated videos of AI-edited images having the strongest effect (2.05x compared to control). Confidence in false memories was also highest for this condition (1.19x compared to control). We discuss potential applications in HCI, such as therapeutic memory reframing, and challenges in ethical, legal, political, and societal domains.

Read more

9/16/2024

Conversational AI Powered by Large Language Models Amplifies False Memories in Witness Interviews
Total Score

1

Conversational AI Powered by Large Language Models Amplifies False Memories in Witness Interviews

Samantha Chan, Pat Pataranutaporn, Aditya Suri, Wazeer Zulfikar, Pattie Maes, Elizabeth F. Loftus

This study examines the impact of AI on human false memories -- recollections of events that did not occur or deviate from actual occurrences. It explores false memory induction through suggestive questioning in Human-AI interactions, simulating crime witness interviews. Four conditions were tested: control, survey-based, pre-scripted chatbot, and generative chatbot using a large language model (LLM). Participants (N=200) watched a crime video, then interacted with their assigned AI interviewer or survey, answering questions including five misleading ones. False memories were assessed immediately and after one week. Results show the generative chatbot condition significantly increased false memory formation, inducing over 3 times more immediate false memories than the control and 1.7 times more than the survey method. 36.4% of users' responses to the generative chatbot were misled through the interaction. After one week, the number of false memories induced by generative chatbots remained constant. However, confidence in these false memories remained higher than the control after one week. Moderating factors were explored: users who were less familiar with chatbots but more familiar with AI technology, and more interested in crime investigations, were more susceptible to false memories. These findings highlight the potential risks of using advanced AI in sensitive contexts, like police interviews, emphasizing the need for ethical considerations.

Read more

8/12/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

As Good As A Coin Toss: Human detection of AI-generated images, videos, audio, and audiovisual stimuli

Di Cooke, Abigail Edwards, Sophia Barkoff, Kathryn Kelly

As synthetic media becomes progressively more realistic and barriers to using it continue to lower, the technology has been increasingly utilized for malicious purposes, from financial fraud to nonconsensual pornography. Today, the principal defense against being misled by synthetic media relies on the ability of the human observer to visually and auditorily discern between real and fake. However, it remains unclear just how vulnerable people actually are to deceptive synthetic media in the course of their day to day lives. We conducted a perceptual study with 1276 participants to assess how accurate people were at distinguishing synthetic images, audio only, video only, and audiovisual stimuli from authentic. To reflect the circumstances under which people would likely encounter synthetic media in the wild, testing conditions and stimuli emulated a typical online platform, while all synthetic media used in the survey was sourced from publicly accessible generative AI technology. We find that overall, participants struggled to meaningfully discern between synthetic and authentic content. We also find that detection performance worsens when the stimuli contains synthetic content as compared to authentic content, images featuring human faces as compared to non face objects, a single modality as compared to multimodal stimuli, mixed authenticity as compared to being fully synthetic for audiovisual stimuli, and features foreign languages as compared to languages the observer is fluent in. Finally, we also find that prior knowledge of synthetic media does not meaningfully impact their detection performance. Collectively, these results indicate that people are highly susceptible to being tricked by synthetic media in their daily lives and that human perceptual detection capabilities can no longer be relied upon as an effective counterdefense.

Read more

4/5/2024

Violation of my body: Perceptions of AI-generated non-consensual (intimate) imagery
Total Score

0

Violation of my body: Perceptions of AI-generated non-consensual (intimate) imagery

Natalie Grace Brigham, Miranda Wei, Tadayoshi Kohno, Elissa M. Redmiles

AI technology has enabled the creation of deepfakes: hyper-realistic synthetic media. We surveyed 315 individuals in the U.S. on their views regarding the hypothetical non-consensual creation of deepfakes depicting them, including deepfakes portraying sexual acts. Respondents indicated strong opposition to creating and, even more so, sharing non-consensually created synthetic content, especially if that content depicts a sexual act. However, seeking out such content appeared more acceptable to some respondents. Attitudes around acceptability varied further based on the hypothetical creator's relationship to the participant, the respondent's gender and their attitudes towards sexual consent. This study provides initial insight into public perspectives of a growing threat and highlights the need for further research to inform social norms as well as ongoing policy conversations and technical developments in generative AI.

Read more

6/18/2024