A Systematic Review of Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA): Domains, Methods, and Trends

Read original: arXiv:2311.10777 - Published 7/29/2024 by Yan Cathy Hua, Paul Denny, Katerina Taskova, Jorg Wicker
Total Score

0

🤯

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) of Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) research, focusing on trends and relationships among key components.
  • ABSA is a type of sentiment analysis that identifies aspects (features or attributes) within a given text and the associated opinions or sentiments.
  • The review examines nearly two decades of ABSA research, analyzing trends, dataset and domain diversity, and solution approaches across different domains.

Plain English Explanation

Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) is a technology that can dig deeper into people's opinions expressed in text data, such as online reviews. Rather than just identifying whether the overall sentiment is positive or negative, ABSA can pinpoint the specific aspects (features or attributes) that people are commenting on and what their opinions are on those aspects.

For example, in a review of a restaurant, ABSA could identify that the reviewer liked the food but disliked the service. This level of detail provides more targeted and actionable insights compared to traditional sentiment analysis, which only gives an overall positive or negative score.

This paper reviews a large body of ABSA research, looking at how the field has evolved over nearly two decades. The analysis uncovers some interesting trends and issues, such as a lack of diversity in the datasets and domains that ABSA systems are typically tested on. This suggests that current ABSA solutions may not perform as well when applied to new or different types of data, which could limit their real-world usefulness.

The paper discusses these findings and proposes ideas for future ABSA research to address the identified challenges, such as [enhancing-performance-aspect-based-sentiment-analysis-systems] and [targeted-aspect-based-emotion-analysis-to-detect] to improve the robustness and generalization of ABSA systems.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to analyze the state of Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) research. ABSA is a fine-grained type of sentiment analysis that goes beyond just identifying the overall positive or negative sentiment in a piece of text. It also determines the specific aspects (features or attributes) that the sentiment is expressed about.

The SLR examined 519 primary ABSA studies, screened from an initial 4,191 search results without any time constraints. This is one of the largest ABSA-focused SLRs to date. The analysis looked at trends in ABSA research over nearly two decades, as well as the distribution of datasets, domains, and solution approaches used in the existing literature.

The key findings include:

  1. Trends in ABSA research development: The analysis identified various stages of growth and focus areas in ABSA research over time.

  2. Lack of dataset and domain diversity: The ABSA studies were heavily concentrated in certain domains, such as product reviews, with limited diversity in the datasets used. This raises concerns about the generalizability of current ABSA solutions.

  3. Domain mismatch: Many ABSA studies evaluated their models on datasets from domains different from those used for training. This domain mismatch could hinder the real-world performance of these systems.

The researchers discuss the implications of these findings and provide suggestions for future ABSA research, such as [all-one-empirical-study-gpt-few-shot], [chatasu-evoking-llms-reflexion-to-truly-understand], and [m2sa-multimodal-multilingual-model-sentiment-analysis-tweets] to address the lack of dataset and domain diversity, as well as the domain mismatch issue.

Critical Analysis

The SLR conducted in this paper provides valuable insights into the state of Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) research. The researchers' systematic and comprehensive approach to reviewing the existing literature is a strength of the study.

However, the paper also highlights some limitations and areas for further research. The finding of a lack of dataset and domain diversity in ABSA studies is concerning, as it suggests that current ABSA solutions may not perform well when applied to new or different types of data. This raises questions about the real-world applicability and generalization of these systems.

Additionally, the domain mismatch issue identified in the paper is an important concern that deserves further investigation. It's possible that ABSA models trained on one domain may not be able to effectively transfer their learning to another domain, limiting their usefulness in practical applications.

The researchers propose several suggestions for future ABSA research, such as exploring techniques to improve the robustness and generalization of ABSA systems. These ideas are valuable, but it would be beneficial to see more concrete proposals and empirical studies to address the systemic challenges highlighted in the paper.

Overall, this SLR provides a comprehensive overview of the ABSA research landscape and identifies important areas for improvement. Addressing the issues of dataset and domain diversity, as well as domain mismatch, could lead to more reliable and practical ABSA solutions in the future.

Conclusion

This Systematic Literature Review (SLR) offers a detailed analysis of the Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) research field over nearly two decades. The study identifies several key trends and systemic issues that could hinder the development and real-world application of ABSA systems.

The main takeaways from this review are:

  1. ABSA research has evolved significantly over time, with various stages of growth and focus areas.
  2. There is a lack of dataset and domain diversity in ABSA studies, raising concerns about the generalizability of current solutions.
  3. Many ABSA studies suffer from a domain mismatch, where models are evaluated on datasets from different domains than those used for training.

These findings suggest that while ABSA has shown promise in providing more detailed and targeted insights from text data, there are still important challenges to address. Addressing these issues, as proposed by the researchers, could lead to more robust and practical ABSA systems that can be effectively deployed in a wider range of real-world applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤯

Total Score

0

A Systematic Review of Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA): Domains, Methods, and Trends

Yan Cathy Hua, Paul Denny, Katerina Taskova, Jorg Wicker

Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) is a fine-grained type of sentiment analysis that identifies aspects and their associated opinions from a given text. With the surge of digital opinionated text data, ABSA gained increasing popularity for its ability to mine more detailed and targeted insights. Many review papers on ABSA subtasks and solution methodologies exist, however, few focus on trends over time or systemic issues relating to research application domains, datasets, and solution approaches. To fill the gap, this paper presents a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) of ABSA studies with a focus on trends and high-level relationships among these fundamental components. This review is one of the largest SLRs on ABSA. To our knowledge, it is also the first to systematically examine the interrelations among ABSA research and data distribution across domains, as well as trends in solution paradigms and approaches. Our sample includes 727 primary studies screened from 8550 search results without time constraints via an innovative automatic filtering process. Our quantitative analysis not only identifies trends in nearly two decades of ABSA research development but also unveils a systemic lack of dataset and domain diversity as well as domain mismatch that may hinder the development of future ABSA research. We discuss these findings and their implications and propose suggestions for future research.

Read more

7/29/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis Techniques: A Comparative Study

Dineth Jayakody, Koshila Isuranda, A V A Malkith, Nisansa de Silva, Sachintha Rajith Ponnamperuma, G G N Sandamali, K L K Sudheera

Since the dawn of the digitalisation era, customer feedback and online reviews are unequivocally major sources of insights for businesses. Consequently, conducting comparative analyses of such sources has become the de facto modus operandi of any business that wishes to give itself a competitive edge over its peers and improve customer loyalty. Sentiment analysis is one such method instrumental in gauging public interest, exposing market trends, and analysing competitors. While traditional sentiment analysis focuses on overall sentiment, as the needs advance with time, it has become important to explore public opinions and sentiments on various specific subjects, products and services mentioned in the reviews on a finer-granular level. To this end, Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA), supported by advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques which have contributed to a paradigm shift from simple word-level analysis to tone and context-aware analyses, focuses on identifying specific aspects within the text and determining the sentiment associated with each aspect. In this study, we compare several deep-NN methods for ABSA on two benchmark datasets (Restaurant14 and Laptop-14) and found that FAST LSA obtains the best overall results of 87.6% and 82.6% accuracy but does not pass LSA+DeBERTa which reports 90.33% and 86.21% accuracy respectively.

Read more

7/8/2024

It is Simple Sometimes: A Study On Improving Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis Performance
Total Score

0

It is Simple Sometimes: A Study On Improving Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis Performance

Laura Cabello, Uchenna Akujuobi

Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) involves extracting opinions from textual data about specific entities and their corresponding aspects through various complementary subtasks. Several prior research has focused on developing ad hoc designs of varying complexities for these subtasks. In this paper, we present a generative framework extensible to any ABSA subtask. We build upon the instruction tuned model proposed by Scaria et al. (2023), who present an instruction-based model with task descriptions followed by in-context examples on ABSA subtasks. We propose PFInstruct, an extension to this instruction learning paradigm by appending an NLP-related task prefix to the task description. This simple approach leads to improved performance across all tested SemEval subtasks, surpassing previous state-of-the-art (SOTA) on the ATE subtask (Rest14) by +3.28 F1-score, and on the AOOE subtask by an average of +5.43 F1-score across SemEval datasets. Furthermore, we explore the impact of the prefix-enhanced prompt quality on the ABSA subtasks and find that even a noisy prefix enhances model performance compared to the baseline. Our method also achieves competitive results on a biomedical domain dataset (ERSA).

Read more

6/7/2024

ROAST: Review-level Opinion Aspect Sentiment Target Joint Detection
Total Score

0

ROAST: Review-level Opinion Aspect Sentiment Target Joint Detection

Siva Uday Sampreeth Chebolu, Franck Dernoncourt, Nedim Lipka, Thamar Solorio

Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) has experienced tremendous expansion and diversity due to various shared tasks spanning several languages and fields and organized via SemEval workshops and Germeval. Nonetheless, a few shortcomings still need to be addressed, such as the lack of low-resource language evaluations and the emphasis on sentence-level analysis. To thoroughly assess ABSA techniques in the context of complete reviews, this research presents a novel task, Review-Level Opinion Aspect Sentiment Target (ROAST). ROAST seeks to close the gap between sentence-level and text-level ABSA by identifying every ABSA constituent at the review level. We extend the available datasets to enable ROAST, addressing the drawbacks noted in previous research by incorporating low-resource languages, numerous languages, and a variety of topics. Through this effort, ABSA research will be able to cover more ground and get a deeper comprehension of the task and its practical application in a variety of languages and domains (https://github.com/RiTUAL-UH/ROAST-ABSA).

Read more

7/22/2024