Talking Wikidata: Communication patterns and their impact on community engagement in collaborative knowledge graphs
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Explores communication patterns and their impact on community engagement in Wikidata, a collaborative knowledge graph
- Analyzes how different types of interactions and discussion influence participation and content creation
- Provides insights into the dynamics of collaborative knowledge construction projects
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines the communication patterns and their influence on community engagement in Wikidata, a collaborative knowledge graph. Wikidata is a project where people work together to build a structured database of information. The researchers analyze how different types of interactions and discussions among the contributors impact their participation and the creation of new content.
The key focus is on understanding the dynamics of this collaborative knowledge construction process. By exploring the communication patterns, the researchers aim to gain insights into what encourages people to actively engage and contribute to the project. This can help inform the design and management of similar collaborative platforms, ensuring they foster a thriving and engaged community.
Technical Explanation
The paper analyzes communication patterns in Wikidata, a collaborative knowledge graph where users work together to build a structured database of information. The researchers examined various types of interactions, such as discussions on talk pages, edits, and reverts, to understand how they influence community engagement and content creation.
The study used data from the Wikidata project, including user contributions, talk page discussions, and other interaction data. The researchers applied statistical analysis and network-based methods to investigate the relationships between communication patterns and user engagement metrics, such as the number of edits and the likelihood of future contributions.
The findings reveal that certain communication patterns, such as constructive discussions and coordinated efforts, are associated with higher levels of user engagement and content creation. In contrast, unproductive discussions or antagonistic behavior can negatively impact community participation. The paper also highlights the importance of recognizing and addressing communication challenges to foster a thriving collaborative environment.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable insights into the dynamics of collaborative knowledge construction projects, particularly in the context of Wikidata. By focusing on communication patterns and their impact on community engagement, the researchers offer a nuanced understanding of the factors that influence participation and content creation in such platforms.
One potential limitation of the study is the specific focus on Wikidata, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other collaborative knowledge graph projects. Differences in community culture, project goals, or platform design could potentially result in varying communication patterns and their effects on engagement.
Additionally, the paper acknowledges that the analysis is limited to quantitative measures of engagement, such as edit counts and user retention. Qualitative aspects, like the depth and quality of contributions, could provide further insights into the impact of communication patterns on the overall knowledge construction process.
Future research could explore the specific mechanisms by which different communication styles and coordination efforts influence user motivation and participation. Investigating the interplay between communication, trust, and community dynamics could also yield additional insights into the sustainability and growth of collaborative knowledge graph projects.
Conclusion
This paper offers a valuable examination of the communication patterns and their influence on community engagement in the collaborative knowledge graph project, Wikidata. The findings highlight the importance of fostering constructive discussions and coordinated efforts to encourage active participation and content creation.
The insights from this research can inform the design and management of similar collaborative platforms, helping to create environments that nurture thriving communities and effective knowledge construction. By understanding the dynamics of communication and its impact on engagement, project leaders can develop strategies to support the long-term sustainability and growth of these collaborative knowledge-building initiatives.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Talking Wikidata: Communication patterns and their impact on community engagement in collaborative knowledge graphs
Elisavet Koutsiana, Ioannis Reklos, Kholoud Saad Alghamdi, Nitisha Jain, Albert Mero~no-Pe~nuela, Elena Simperl
We study collaboration patterns of Wikidata, one of the world's largest collaborative knowledge graph communities. Wikidata lacks long-term engagement with a small group of priceless members, 0.8%, to be responsible for 80% of contributions. Therefore, it is essential to investigate their behavioural patterns and find ways to enhance their contributions and participation. Previous studies have highlighted the importance of discussions among contributors in understanding these patterns. To investigate this, we analyzed all the discussions on Wikidata and used a mixed methods approach, including statistical tests, network analysis, and text and graph embedding representations. Our research showed that the interactions between Wikidata editors form a small world network where the content of a post influences the continuity of conversations. We also found that the account age of Wikidata members and their conversations are significant factors in their long-term engagement with the project. Our findings can benefit the Wikidata community by helping them improve their practices to increase contributions and enhance long-term participation.
Read more7/29/2024
0
Agreeing and Disagreeing in Collaborative Knowledge Graph Construction: An Analysis of Wikidata
Elisavet Koutsiana, Tushita Yadav, Nitisha Jain, Albert Mero~no-Pe~nuela, Elena Simperl
In this work, we study disagreement in discussions around Wikidata, an online knowledge community that builds the data backend of Wikipedia. Discussions are important in collaborative work as they can increase contributor performance and encourage the emergence of shared norms and practices. While disagreements can play a productive role in discussions, they can also lead to conflicts and controversies, which impact contributor well-being and their motivation to engage. We want to understand if and when such phenomena arise in Wikidata, using a mix of quantitative and qualitative analyses to identify the types of topics people disagree about, the most common patterns of interaction, and roles people play when arguing for or against an issue. We find that decisions to create Wikidata properties are much faster than those to delete properties and that more than half of controversial discussions do not lead to consensus. Our analysis suggests that Wikidata is an inclusive community, considering different opinions when making decisions, and that conflict and vandalism are rare in discussions. At the same time, while one-fourth of the editors participating in controversial discussions contribute with legit and insightful opinions about Wikidata's emerging issues, they do not remain engaged in the discussions. We hope our findings will help Wikidata support community decision making, and improve discussion tools and practices.
Read more7/24/2024
🌐
0
Highly engaging events reveal semantic and temporal compression in online community discourse
Antonio Desiderio, Anna Mancini, Giulio Cimini, Riccardo Di Clemente
People nowadays express their opinions in online spaces, using different forms of interactions such as posting, sharing and discussing with one another. How do these digital traces change in response to events happening in the real world? We leverage Reddit conversation data, exploiting its community-based structure, to elucidate how offline events influence online user interactions and behavior. Online conversations, as posts and comments, are analysed along their temporal and semantic dimensions. Conversations tend to become repetitive with a more limited vocabulary, develop at a faster pace and feature heightened emotions. As the event approaches, the shifts occurring in conversations are reflected in the users' dynamics. Users become more active and they exchange information with a growing audience, despite using a less rich vocabulary and repetitive messages. The recurring patterns we discovered are persistent across a wide range of events and several contexts, representing a fingerprint of how online dynamics change in response to real-world occurrences.
Read more7/24/2024
⚙️
0
Curious Rhythms: Temporal Regularities of Wikipedia Consumption
Tiziano Piccardi, Martin Gerlach, Robert West
Wikipedia, in its role as the world's largest encyclopedia, serves a broad range of information needs. Although previous studies have noted that Wikipedia users' information needs vary throughout the day, there is to date no large-scale, quantitative study of the underlying dynamics. The present paper fills this gap by investigating temporal regularities in daily consumption patterns in a large-scale analysis of billions of timezone-corrected page requests mined from English Wikipedia's server logs, with the goal of investigating how context and time relate to the kind of information consumed. First, we show that even after removing the global pattern of day-night alternation, the consumption habits of individual articles maintain strong diurnal regularities. Then, we characterize the prototypical shapes of consumption patterns, finding a particularly strong distinction between articles preferred during the evening/night and articles preferred during working hours. Finally, we investigate topical and contextual correlates of Wikipedia articles' access rhythms, finding that article topic, reader country, and access device (mobile vs. desktop) are all important predictors of daily attention patterns. These findings shed new light on how humans seek information on the Web by focusing on Wikipedia as one of the largest open platforms for knowledge and learning, emphasizing Wikipedia's role as a rich knowledge base that fulfills information needs spread throughout the day, with implications for understanding information seeking across the globe and for designing appropriate information systems.
Read more4/23/2024