Ten Hard Problems in Artificial Intelligence We Must Get Right
2402.04464
4
0
💬
Abstract
We explore the AI2050 hard problems that block the promise of AI and cause AI risks: (1) developing general capabilities of the systems; (2) assuring the performance of AI systems and their training processes; (3) aligning system goals with human goals; (4) enabling great applications of AI in real life; (5) addressing economic disruptions; (6) ensuring the participation of all; (7) at the same time ensuring socially responsible deployment; (8) addressing any geopolitical disruptions that AI causes; (9) promoting sound governance of the technology; and (10) managing the philosophical disruptions for humans living in the age of AI. For each problem, we outline the area, identify significant recent work, and suggest ways forward. [Note: this paper reviews literature through January 2023.]
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- The paper explores 10 "hard problems" that are currently blocking the full promise of AI and causing AI risks.
- These problems cover areas such as developing general AI capabilities, ensuring AI system performance and alignment with human goals, enabling real-world AI applications, addressing economic and societal disruptions, and promoting responsible AI governance.
- For each problem, the paper outlines the key challenges, summarizes recent research, and suggests potential ways forward.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at 10 major challenges that are preventing AI from fully realizing its potential and causing potential risks. These challenges include:
- Developing General Capabilities: Creating AI systems that can learn and adapt like humans, rather than just excel at narrow tasks.
- Assuring AI Performance: Ensuring AI systems behave reliably and as intended, even as they become more complex.
- Aligning AI Goals: Making sure the goals and objectives of AI systems are well-aligned with human values and priorities.
- Enabling Real-World AI: Developing AI technologies that can be effectively applied to solve real-world problems.
- Addressing Economic Disruption: Managing the economic upheaval that may be caused by the widespread adoption of AI.
- Ensuring Participation: Making sure the benefits and risks of AI are shared equitably across society.
- Responsible Deployment: Deploying AI in a socially responsible manner that mitigates potential harms.
- Addressing Geopolitical Impacts: Dealing with the geopolitical ramifications that could arise from the development of powerful AI.
- Promoting Governance: Establishing effective governance frameworks to guide the development and use of AI.
- Managing Philosophical Disruption: Grappling with the profound philosophical questions raised by the rise of AI.
For each of these challenges, the paper summarizes recent research efforts and suggests potential ways to make progress. The goal is to identify the key roadblocks to realizing the promise of AI while also addressing the risks it poses.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a comprehensive overview of 10 "hard problems" that are currently impeding the full realization of AI's potential and contributing to AI risks. These problems span a range of technical, social, and philosophical domains.
For the first challenge, [object Object], the paper discusses the limitations of current AI systems in achieving human-like general intelligence and the need for more flexible and adaptable learning algorithms. Recent work in areas like meta-learning and self-supervised learning is highlighted as a potential way forward.
The second challenge, [object Object], focuses on ensuring the reliability, safety, and robustness of AI systems, especially as they become more complex. The paper reviews research on topics like AI testing, verification, and transparency to address these concerns.
The third challenge, [object Object], examines the critical task of ensuring AI systems' objectives and decision-making processes are well-aligned with human values and preferences. Approaches like inverse reinforcement learning and value learning are discussed as potential solutions.
The remaining challenges cover a range of socioeconomic, governance, and philosophical issues, such as [object Object], [Addressing Economic Disruption], [Ensuring Participation], [Responsible Deployment], [Addressing Geopolitical Impacts], [Promoting Governance], and [Managing Philosophical Disruption]. For each of these, the paper summarizes relevant research and proposes potential paths forward.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and well-researched overview of the key challenges facing the field of AI, addressing both technical and non-technical barriers to the realization of AI's full potential. By outlining these "hard problems," the authors have identified critical areas that deserve ongoing attention and investment from the research community.
One potential limitation of the paper is that it may not delve deeply enough into the nuances and complexities of each challenge. While the authors provide a high-level summary of recent work and potential solutions, a more detailed exploration of the specific technical approaches, their tradeoffs, and the remaining open questions could be valuable for researchers and policymakers.
Additionally, the paper could have explored the interdependencies and interactions between the various problems more extensively. For instance, the challenge of [object Object] is closely tied to the challenges of [Responsible Deployment] and [Promoting Governance], and a more holistic examination of these interconnected issues could yield additional insights.
Nevertheless, the paper serves as an important and timely contribution to the ongoing discourse on the future of AI. By highlighting these critical challenges, the authors have provided a valuable roadmap for the research community and policymakers to focus their efforts on tackling the most pressing problems and realizing the transformative potential of AI while mitigating its risks.
Conclusion
The paper presents a comprehensive overview of 10 "hard problems" that are currently impeding the full realization of AI's potential and contributing to AI risks. These challenges span technical, social, economic, and philosophical domains, and the authors outline recent research efforts and potential ways forward for each.
By identifying and addressing these critical issues, the research community and policymakers can work towards developing AI systems that are more capable, reliable, and aligned with human values. This, in turn, will enable the deployment of transformative AI applications that can benefit society while mitigating the potential risks and disruptions associated with this rapidly evolving technology.
Related Papers
🤖
Now, Later, and Lasting: Ten Priorities for AI Research, Policy, and Practice
Eric Horvitz, Vincent Conitzer, Sheila McIlraith, Peter Stone
0
0
Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) will transform many aspects of our lives and society, bringing immense opportunities but also posing significant risks and challenges. The next several decades may well be a turning point for humanity, comparable to the industrial revolution. We write to share a set of recommendations for moving forward from the perspective of the founder and leaders of the One Hundred Year Study on AI. Launched a decade ago, the project is committed to a perpetual series of studies by multidisciplinary experts to evaluate the immediate, longer-term, and far-reaching effects of AI on people and society, and to make recommendations about AI research, policy, and practice. As we witness new capabilities emerging from neural models, it is crucial that we engage in efforts to advance our scientific understanding of these models and their behaviors. We must address the impact of AI on people and society through technical, social, and sociotechnical lenses, incorporating insights from a diverse range of experts including voices from engineering, social, behavioral, and economic disciplines. By fostering dialogue, collaboration, and action among various stakeholders, we can strategically guide the development and deployment of AI in ways that maximize its potential for contributing to human flourishing. Despite the growing divide in the field between focusing on short-term versus long-term implications, we think both are of critical importance. As Alan Turing, one of the pioneers of AI, wrote in 1950, We can only see a short distance ahead, but we can see plenty there that needs to be done. We offer ten recommendations for action that collectively address both the short- and long-term potential impacts of AI technologies.
4/23/2024
Thousands of AI Authors on the Future of AI
Katja Grace, Harlan Stewart, Julia Fabienne Sandkuhler, Stephen Thomas, Ben Weinstein-Raun, Jan Brauner
0
0
In the largest survey of its kind, 2,778 researchers who had published in top-tier artificial intelligence (AI) venues gave predictions on the pace of AI progress and the nature and impacts of advanced AI systems The aggregate forecasts give at least a 50% chance of AI systems achieving several milestones by 2028, including autonomously constructing a payment processing site from scratch, creating a song indistinguishable from a new song by a popular musician, and autonomously downloading and fine-tuning a large language model. If science continues undisrupted, the chance of unaided machines outperforming humans in every possible task was estimated at 10% by 2027, and 50% by 2047. The latter estimate is 13 years earlier than that reached in a similar survey we conducted only one year earlier [Grace et al., 2022]. However, the chance of all human occupations becoming fully automatable was forecast to reach 10% by 2037, and 50% as late as 2116 (compared to 2164 in the 2022 survey). Most respondents expressed substantial uncertainty about the long-term value of AI progress: While 68.3% thought good outcomes from superhuman AI are more likely than bad, of these net optimists 48% gave at least a 5% chance of extremely bad outcomes such as human extinction, and 59% of net pessimists gave 5% or more to extremely good outcomes. Between 38% and 51% of respondents gave at least a 10% chance to advanced AI leading to outcomes as bad as human extinction. More than half suggested that substantial or extreme concern is warranted about six different AI-related scenarios, including misinformation, authoritarian control, and inequality. There was disagreement about whether faster or slower AI progress would be better for the future of humanity. However, there was broad agreement that research aimed at minimizing potential risks from AI systems ought to be prioritized more.
5/2/2024
🤖
The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistants
Iason Gabriel, Arianna Manzini, Geoff Keeling, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Verena Rieser, Hasan Iqbal, Nenad Tomav{s}ev, Ira Ktena, Zachary Kenton, Mikel Rodriguez, Seliem El-Sayed, Sasha Brown, Canfer Akbulut, Andrew Trask, Edward Hughes, A. Stevie Bergman, Renee Shelby, Nahema Marchal, Conor Griffin, Juan Mateos-Garcia, Laura Weidinger, Winnie Street, Benjamin Lange, Alex Ingerman, Alison Lentz, Reed Enger, Andrew Barakat, Victoria Krakovna, John Oliver Siy, Zeb Kurth-Nelson, Amanda McCroskery, Vijay Bolina, Harry Law, Murray Shanahan, Lize Alberts, Borja Balle, Sarah de Haas, Yetunde Ibitoye, Allan Dafoe, Beth Goldberg, S'ebastien Krier, Alexander Reese, Sims Witherspoon, Will Hawkins, Maribeth Rauh, Don Wallace, Matija Franklin, Josh A. Goldstein, Joel Lehman, Michael Klenk, Shannon Vallor, Courtney Biles, Meredith Ringel Morris, Helen King, Blaise Aguera y Arcas, William Isaac, James Manyika
0
0
This paper focuses on the opportunities and the ethical and societal risks posed by advanced AI assistants. We define advanced AI assistants as artificial agents with natural language interfaces, whose function is to plan and execute sequences of actions on behalf of a user, across one or more domains, in line with the user's expectations. The paper starts by considering the technology itself, providing an overview of AI assistants, their technical foundations and potential range of applications. It then explores questions around AI value alignment, well-being, safety and malicious uses. Extending the circle of inquiry further, we next consider the relationship between advanced AI assistants and individual users in more detail, exploring topics such as manipulation and persuasion, anthropomorphism, appropriate relationships, trust and privacy. With this analysis in place, we consider the deployment of advanced assistants at a societal scale, focusing on cooperation, equity and access, misinformation, economic impact, the environment and how best to evaluate advanced AI assistants. Finally, we conclude by providing a range of recommendations for researchers, developers, policymakers and public stakeholders.
4/30/2024
🤖
Frontier AI Ethics: Anticipating and Evaluating the Societal Impacts of Generative Agents
Seth Lazar
0
0
Some have criticised Generative AI Systems for replicating the familiar pathologies of already widely-deployed AI systems. Other critics highlight how they foreshadow vastly more powerful future systems, which might threaten humanity's survival. The first group says there is nothing new here; the other looks through the present to a perhaps distant horizon. In this paper, I instead pay attention to what makes these particular systems distinctive: both their remarkable scientific achievement, and the most likely and consequential ways in which they will change society over the next five to ten years. In particular, I explore the potential societal impacts and normative questions raised by the looming prospect of 'Generative Agents', in which multimodal large language models (LLMs) form the executive centre of complex, tool-using AI systems that can take unsupervised sequences of actions towards some goal.
4/11/2024