Frontier AI Ethics: Anticipating and Evaluating the Societal Impacts of Generative Agents
2404.06750
0
0
🤖
Abstract
Some have criticised Generative AI Systems for replicating the familiar pathologies of already widely-deployed AI systems. Other critics highlight how they foreshadow vastly more powerful future systems, which might threaten humanity's survival. The first group says there is nothing new here; the other looks through the present to a perhaps distant horizon. In this paper, I instead pay attention to what makes these particular systems distinctive: both their remarkable scientific achievement, and the most likely and consequential ways in which they will change society over the next five to ten years. In particular, I explore the potential societal impacts and normative questions raised by the looming prospect of 'Generative Agents', in which multimodal large language models (LLMs) form the executive centre of complex, tool-using AI systems that can take unsupervised sequences of actions towards some goal.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- The paper discusses the potential societal impacts and normative questions raised by the rise of "Generative Agents" - AI systems that can take unsupervised actions towards goals.
- It distinguishes these systems from existing AI by focusing on their unique scientific achievements and the likely changes they will bring over the next 5-10 years.
- The paper aims to go beyond critiques that either dismiss these systems as familiar or warn of distant existential threats.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines a new type of AI system called "Generative Agents." These systems are based on large language models (LLMs) that can generate human-like text, images, and other content. What makes them distinctive is their ability to take unsupervised actions towards goals, rather than just producing content.
The author notes that some critics have dismissed Generative Agents as simply replicating issues with existing AI systems. Others have warned about the existential threats these systems may pose in the distant future. However, the paper focuses on the unique scientific achievements of Generative Agents and the more immediate societal changes they are likely to bring over the next 5-10 years.
The key idea is that these systems can form the "executive center" of complex, tool-using AI systems. In other words, they can coordinate the use of various AI capabilities to accomplish tasks, rather than just generating content. This raises important questions about the impacts and ethical implications of these systems as they become more widespread.
Technical Explanation
The paper examines the emergence of "Generative Agents" - AI systems that combine large language models (LLMs) with the ability to take unsupervised sequences of actions towards goals. This contrasts with existing LLM-based systems, which are largely focused on content generation.
The author argues that Generative Agents represent a significant scientific achievement, as they can form the "executive center" of complex, tool-using AI systems. These systems can coordinate the use of various AI capabilities, such as natural language processing, computer vision, and reinforcement learning, to accomplish tasks in an autonomous manner.
The paper suggests that the development of Generative Agents is likely to lead to significant societal changes over the next 5-10 years, as these systems become more widespread and capable. This includes the potential for automated task completion and the need to address ethical and normative questions around the use of these systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges that some critics have raised valid concerns about Generative Agents, such as their potential to replicate issues seen in existing AI systems. However, the author argues that dismissing these systems as familiar or warning about distant existential threats misses the unique challenges and opportunities they present.
One potential limitation discussed is the need to address the ethical and normative questions raised by the use of Generative Agents. As these systems become more capable of autonomous task completion, there will be a need to develop frameworks for ensuring their safe and responsible deployment.
Additionally, the paper does not explore in depth the technical details of how Generative Agents are constructed or the specific architectural innovations that enable their capabilities. Further research may be needed to fully understand the inner workings of these systems and their potential limitations.
Conclusion
The paper presents a nuanced perspective on the emergence of Generative Agents, a new class of AI systems that can form the executive center of complex, tool-using AI systems. While acknowledging the valid concerns raised by critics, the author argues that these systems represent a significant scientific achievement and are likely to drive substantial societal changes over the next 5-10 years.
The key takeaway is that Generative Agents require careful consideration of their potential impacts and the development of appropriate ethical and regulatory frameworks to ensure their safe and responsible deployment. As these systems become more widespread, ongoing research and public discourse will be essential to navigating the challenges and opportunities they present.
Related Papers
🐍
The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making
Valerio Capraro, Austin Lentsch, Daron Acemoglu, Selin Akgun, Aisel Akhmedova, Ennio Bilancini, Jean-Franc{c}ois Bonnefon, Pablo Bra~nas-Garza, Luigi Butera, Karen M. Douglas, Jim A. C. Everett, Gerd Gigerenzer, Christine Greenhow, Daniel A. Hashimoto, Julianne Holt-Lunstad, Jolanda Jetten, Simon Johnson, Chiara Longoni, Pete Lunn, Simone Natale, Iyad Rahwan, Neil Selwyn, Vivek Singh, Siddharth Suri, Jennifer Sutcliffe, Joe Tomlinson, Sander van der Linden, Paul A. M. Van Lange, Friederike Wall, Jay J. Van Bavel, Riccardo Viale
0
0
Generative artificial intelligence has the potential to both exacerbate and ameliorate existing socioeconomic inequalities. In this article, we provide a state-of-the-art interdisciplinary overview of the potential impacts of generative AI on (mis)information and three information-intensive domains: work, education, and healthcare. Our goal is to highlight how generative AI could worsen existing inequalities while illuminating how AI may help mitigate pervasive social problems. In the information domain, generative AI can democratize content creation and access, but may dramatically expand the production and proliferation of misinformation. In the workplace, it can boost productivity and create new jobs, but the benefits will likely be distributed unevenly. In education, it offers personalized learning, but may widen the digital divide. In healthcare, it might improve diagnostics and accessibility, but could deepen pre-existing inequalities. In each section we cover a specific topic, evaluate existing research, identify critical gaps, and recommend research directions, including explicit trade-offs that complicate the derivation of a priori hypotheses. We conclude with a section highlighting the role of policymaking to maximize generative AI's potential to reduce inequalities while mitigating its harmful effects. We discuss strengths and weaknesses of existing policy frameworks in the European Union, the United States, and the United Kingdom, observing that each fails to fully confront the socioeconomic challenges we have identified. We propose several concrete policies that could promote shared prosperity through the advancement of generative AI. This article emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary collaborations to understand and address the complex challenges of generative AI.
5/7/2024
🤖
The Psychosocial Impacts of Generative AI Harms
Faye-Marie Vassel, Evan Shieh, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Thema Monroe-White
0
0
The rapid emergence of generative Language Models (LMs) has led to growing concern about the impacts that their unexamined adoption may have on the social well-being of diverse user groups. Meanwhile, LMs are increasingly being adopted in K-20 schools and one-on-one student settings with minimal investigation of potential harms associated with their deployment. Motivated in part by real-world/everyday use cases (e.g., an AI writing assistant) this paper explores the potential psychosocial harms of stories generated by five leading LMs in response to open-ended prompting. We extend findings of stereotyping harms analyzing a total of 150K 100-word stories related to student classroom interactions. Examining patterns in LM-generated character demographics and representational harms (i.e., erasure, subordination, and stereotyping) we highlight particularly egregious vignettes, illustrating the ways LM-generated outputs may influence the experiences of users with marginalized and minoritized identities, and emphasizing the need for a critical understanding of the psychosocial impacts of generative AI tools when deployed and utilized in diverse social contexts.
5/6/2024
💬
Distributed agency in second language learning and teaching through generative AI
Robert Godwin-Jones
0
0
Generative AI offers significant opportunities for language learning. Tools like ChatGPT can provide informal second language practice through chats in written or voice forms, with the learner specifying through prompts conversational parameters such as proficiency level, language register, and discussion topics. AI can be instructed to give corrective feedback, create practice exercises, or develop an extended study plan. Instructors can use AI to build learning and assessment materials in a variety of media. AI is likely to make immersive technologies more powerful and versatile, moving away from scripted interactions. For both learners and teachers, it is important to understand the limitations of AI systems that arise from their purely statistical model of human language, which limits their ability to deal with nuanced social and cultural aspects of language use. Additionally, there are ethical concerns over how AI systems are created as well as practical constraints in their use, especially for less privileged populations. The power and versatility of AI tools are likely to turn them into valuable and constant companions in many peoples lives (akin to smartphones), creating a close connection that goes beyond simple tool use. Ecological theories such as sociomaterialism are helpful in examining the shared agency that develops through close user-AI interactions, as are the perspectives on human-object relations from Indigenous cultures.
4/1/2024
🤖
The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistants
Iason Gabriel, Arianna Manzini, Geoff Keeling, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Verena Rieser, Hasan Iqbal, Nenad Tomav{s}ev, Ira Ktena, Zachary Kenton, Mikel Rodriguez, Seliem El-Sayed, Sasha Brown, Canfer Akbulut, Andrew Trask, Edward Hughes, A. Stevie Bergman, Renee Shelby, Nahema Marchal, Conor Griffin, Juan Mateos-Garcia, Laura Weidinger, Winnie Street, Benjamin Lange, Alex Ingerman, Alison Lentz, Reed Enger, Andrew Barakat, Victoria Krakovna, John Oliver Siy, Zeb Kurth-Nelson, Amanda McCroskery, Vijay Bolina, Harry Law, Murray Shanahan, Lize Alberts, Borja Balle, Sarah de Haas, Yetunde Ibitoye, Allan Dafoe, Beth Goldberg, S'ebastien Krier, Alexander Reese, Sims Witherspoon, Will Hawkins, Maribeth Rauh, Don Wallace, Matija Franklin, Josh A. Goldstein, Joel Lehman, Michael Klenk, Shannon Vallor, Courtney Biles, Meredith Ringel Morris, Helen King, Blaise Aguera y Arcas, William Isaac, James Manyika
0
0
This paper focuses on the opportunities and the ethical and societal risks posed by advanced AI assistants. We define advanced AI assistants as artificial agents with natural language interfaces, whose function is to plan and execute sequences of actions on behalf of a user, across one or more domains, in line with the user's expectations. The paper starts by considering the technology itself, providing an overview of AI assistants, their technical foundations and potential range of applications. It then explores questions around AI value alignment, well-being, safety and malicious uses. Extending the circle of inquiry further, we next consider the relationship between advanced AI assistants and individual users in more detail, exploring topics such as manipulation and persuasion, anthropomorphism, appropriate relationships, trust and privacy. With this analysis in place, we consider the deployment of advanced assistants at a societal scale, focusing on cooperation, equity and access, misinformation, economic impact, the environment and how best to evaluate advanced AI assistants. Finally, we conclude by providing a range of recommendations for researchers, developers, policymakers and public stakeholders.
4/30/2024